These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24548737)

  • 1. Prediction of skin sensitizers using alternative methods to animal experimentation.
    Johansson H; Lindstedt M
    Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol; 2014 Jul; 115(1):110-7. PubMed ID: 24548737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A critical appraisal of the process of regulatory implementation of novel in vivo and in vitro methods for chemical hazard and risk assessment.
    Piersma AH; Ezendam J; Luijten M; Muller JJ; Rorije E; van der Ven LT; van Benthem J
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2014 Nov; 44(10):876-94. PubMed ID: 25058877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Skin sensitisation--moving forward with non-animal testing strategies for regulatory purposes in the EU.
    Basketter D; Alépée N; Casati S; Crozier J; Eigler D; Griem P; Hubesch B; de Knecht J; Landsiedel R; Louekari K; Manou I; Maxwell G; Mehling A; Netzeva T; Petry T; Rossi LH
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Dec; 67(3):531-5. PubMed ID: 24140884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The integrated project ReProTect: a novel approach in reproductive toxicity hazard assessment.
    Hareng L; Pellizzer C; Bremer S; Schwarz M; Hartung T
    Reprod Toxicol; 2005; 20(3):441-52. PubMed ID: 15899576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prediction of skin sensitization potency using machine learning approaches.
    Zang Q; Paris M; Lehmann DM; Bell S; Kleinstreuer N; Allen D; Matheson J; Jacobs A; Casey W; Strickland J
    J Appl Toxicol; 2017 Jul; 37(7):792-805. PubMed ID: 28074598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A European perspective on alternatives to animal testing for environmental hazard identification and risk assessment.
    Scholz S; Sela E; Blaha L; Braunbeck T; Galay-Burgos M; García-Franco M; Guinea J; Klüver N; Schirmer K; Tanneberger K; Tobor-Kapłon M; Witters H; Belanger S; Benfenati E; Creton S; Cronin MT; Eggen RI; Embry M; Ekman D; Gourmelon A; Halder M; Hardy B; Hartung T; Hubesch B; Jungmann D; Lampi MA; Lee L; Léonard M; Küster E; Lillicrap A; Luckenbach T; Murk AJ; Navas JM; Peijnenburg W; Repetto G; Salinas E; Schüürmann G; Spielmann H; Tollefsen KE; Walter-Rohde S; Whale G; Wheeler JR; Winter MJ
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Dec; 67(3):506-30. PubMed ID: 24161465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating the performance of integrated approaches for hazard identification of skin sensitizing chemicals.
    van der Veen JW; Rorije E; Emter R; Natsch A; van Loveren H; Ezendam J
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2014 Aug; 69(3):371-9. PubMed ID: 24813372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Integrated testing strategies for use in the EU REACH system.
    Grindon C; Combes R; Cronin MT; Roberts DW; Garrod JF
    Altern Lab Anim; 2006 Aug; 34(4):407-27. PubMed ID: 16945008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An in vitro method for detecting chemical sensitization using human reconstructed skin models and its applicability to cosmetic, pharmaceutical, and medical device safety testing.
    McKim JM; Keller DJ; Gorski JR
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2012 Dec; 31(4):292-305. PubMed ID: 22494060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Animal testing and alternative approaches for the human health risk assessment under the proposed new European chemicals regulation.
    Höfer T; Gerner I; Gundert-Remy U; Liebsch M; Schulte A; Spielmann H; Vogel R; Wettig K
    Arch Toxicol; 2004 Oct; 78(10):549-64. PubMed ID: 15170526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. SEURAT: Safety Evaluation Ultimately Replacing Animal Testing--recommendations for future research in the field of predictive toxicology.
    Daston G; Knight DJ; Schwarz M; Gocht T; Thomas RS; Mahony C; Whelan M
    Arch Toxicol; 2015 Jan; 89(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 25433540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Non-animal sensitization testing: state-of-the-art.
    Vandebriel RJ; van Loveren H
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2010 May; 40(5):389-404. PubMed ID: 20180632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Re-evaluation of animal numbers and costs for in vivo tests to accomplish REACH legislation requirements for chemicals - a report by the transatlantic think tank for toxicology (t(4)).
    Rovida C; Hartung T
    ALTEX; 2009; 26(3):187-208. PubMed ID: 19907906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. State of the art in non-animal approaches for skin sensitization testing: from individual test methods towards testing strategies.
    Ezendam J; Braakhuis HM; Vandebriel RJ
    Arch Toxicol; 2016 Dec; 90(12):2861-2883. PubMed ID: 27629427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Introduction to the EU REACH legislation.
    Grindon C; Combes R
    Altern Lab Anim; 2006 Mar; 34 Suppl 1():5-10. PubMed ID: 16555955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A review of the status of alternative approaches to animal testing and the development of integrated testing strategies for assessing the toxicity of chemicals under REACH--a summary of a DEFRA-funded project conducted by Liverpool John Moores University and FRAME.
    Grindon C; Combes R; Cronin MT; Roberts DW; Garrod J
    Altern Lab Anim; 2006 Mar; 34 Suppl 1():149-58. PubMed ID: 16555968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identifying and characterizing chemical skin sensitizers without animal testing: Colipa's research and method development program.
    Aeby P; Ashikaga T; Bessou-Touya S; Schepky A; Gerberick F; Kern P; Marrec-Fairley M; Maxwell G; Ovigne JM; Sakaguchi H; Reisinger K; Tailhardat M; Martinozzi-Teissier S; Winkler P
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2010 Sep; 24(6):1465-73. PubMed ID: 20624454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Transfer learning for predicting human skin sensitizers.
    Tung CW; Lin YH; Wang SS
    Arch Toxicol; 2019 Apr; 93(4):931-940. PubMed ID: 30806762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Probabilistic hazard assessment for skin sensitization potency by dose-response modeling using feature elimination instead of quantitative structure-activity relationships.
    Luechtefeld T; Maertens A; McKim JM; Hartung T; Kleensang A; Sá-Rocha V
    J Appl Toxicol; 2015 Nov; 35(11):1361-1371. PubMed ID: 26046447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Test battery with the human cell line activation test, direct peptide reactivity assay and DEREK based on a 139 chemical data set for predicting skin sensitizing potential and potency of chemicals.
    Takenouchi O; Fukui S; Okamoto K; Kurotani S; Imai N; Fujishiro M; Kyotani D; Kato Y; Kasahara T; Fujita M; Toyoda A; Sekiya D; Watanabe S; Seto H; Hirota M; Ashikaga T; Miyazawa M
    J Appl Toxicol; 2015 Nov; 35(11):1318-32. PubMed ID: 25820183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.