BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24549725)

  • 1. Assessing calibration of multinomial risk prediction models.
    Van Hoorde K; Vergouwe Y; Timmerman D; Van Huffel S; Steyerberg EW; Van Calster B
    Stat Med; 2014 Jul; 33(15):2585-96. PubMed ID: 24549725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Simple dichotomous updating methods improved the validity of polytomous prediction models.
    Van Hoorde K; Vergouwe Y; Timmerman D; Van Huffel S; Steyerberg EW; Van Calster B
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Oct; 66(10):1158-65. PubMed ID: 23849738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A spline-based tool to assess and visualize the calibration of multiclass risk predictions.
    Van Hoorde K; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D; Bourne T; Van Calster B
    J Biomed Inform; 2015 Apr; 54():283-93. PubMed ID: 25579635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Polytomous logistic regression analysis could be applied more often in diagnostic research.
    Biesheuvel CJ; Vergouwe Y; Steyerberg EW; Grobbee DE; Moons KG
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 61(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 18177785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Polytomous diagnosis of ovarian tumors as benign, borderline, primary invasive or metastatic: development and validation of standard and kernel-based risk prediction models.
    Van Calster B; Valentin L; Van Holsbeke C; Testa AC; Bourne T; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Oct; 10():96. PubMed ID: 20961457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing the discriminative ability of risk models for more than two outcome categories.
    Van Calster B; Vergouwe Y; Looman CW; Van Belle V; Timmerman D; Steyerberg EW
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2012 Oct; 27(10):761-70. PubMed ID: 23054032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Extending the c-statistic to nominal polytomous outcomes: the Polytomous Discrimination Index.
    Van Calster B; Van Belle V; Vergouwe Y; Timmerman D; Van Huffel S; Steyerberg EW
    Stat Med; 2012 Oct; 31(23):2610-26. PubMed ID: 22733650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sample size considerations and predictive performance of multinomial logistic prediction models.
    de Jong VMT; Eijkemans MJC; van Calster B; Timmerman D; Moons KGM; Steyerberg EW; van Smeden M
    Stat Med; 2019 Apr; 38(9):1601-1619. PubMed ID: 30614028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risk prediction models for discrete ordinal outcomes: Calibration and the impact of the proportional odds assumption.
    Edlinger M; van Smeden M; Alber HF; Wanitschek M; Van Calster B
    Stat Med; 2022 Apr; 41(8):1334-1360. PubMed ID: 34897756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation and updating of risk models based on multinomial logistic regression.
    Van Calster B; Van Hoorde K; Vergouwe Y; Bobdiwala S; Condous G; Kirk E; Bourne T; Steyerberg EW
    Diagn Progn Res; 2017; 1():2. PubMed ID: 31093534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pre-operative and intraoperative determinants for prolonged ventilation following adult cardiac surgery.
    Widyastuti Y; Stenseth R; Pleym H; Wahba A; Videm V
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2012 Feb; 56(2):190-9. PubMed ID: 22091558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validation of a transfusion prediction model in head and neck cancer surgery.
    Krupp NL; Weinstein G; Chalian A; Berlin JA; Wolf P; Weber RS
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2003 Dec; 129(12):1297-302. PubMed ID: 14676155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Flexible recalibration of binary clinical prediction models.
    Dalton JE
    Stat Med; 2013 Jan; 32(2):282-9. PubMed ID: 22847754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A global goodness-of-fit test for receiver operating characteristic curve analysis via the bootstrap method.
    Zou KH; Resnic FS; Talos IF; Goldberg-Zimring D; Bhagwat JG; Haker SJ; Kikinis R; Jolesz FA; Ohno-Machado L
    J Biomed Inform; 2005 Oct; 38(5):395-403. PubMed ID: 16198998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A clinical prediction rule for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: validation, updating, and extension.
    Genders TS; Steyerberg EW; Alkadhi H; Leschka S; Desbiolles L; Nieman K; Galema TW; Meijboom WB; Mollet NR; de Feyter PJ; Cademartiri F; Maffei E; Dewey M; Zimmermann E; Laule M; Pugliese F; Barbagallo R; Sinitsyn V; Bogaert J; Goetschalckx K; Schoepf UJ; Rowe GW; Schuijf JD; Bax JJ; de Graaf FR; Knuuti J; Kajander S; van Mieghem CA; Meijs MF; Cramer MJ; Gopalan D; Feuchtner G; Friedrich G; Krestin GP; Hunink MG;
    Eur Heart J; 2011 Jun; 32(11):1316-30. PubMed ID: 21367834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recalibration of risk prediction models in a large multicenter cohort of admissions to adult, general critical care units in the United Kingdom.
    Harrison DA; Brady AR; Parry GJ; Carpenter JR; Rowan K
    Crit Care Med; 2006 May; 34(5):1378-88. PubMed ID: 16557153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Polytomous regression did not outperform dichotomous logistic regression in diagnosing serious bacterial infections in febrile children.
    Roukema J; van Loenhout RB; Steyerberg EW; Moons KG; Bleeker SE; Moll HA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 61(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 18177786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Logistic versus additive EuroSCORE. A comparative assessment of the two models in an independent population sample.
    Zingone B; Pappalardo A; Dreas L
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Dec; 26(6):1134-40. PubMed ID: 15541974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A new calibration test and a reappraisal of the calibration belt for the assessment of prediction models based on dichotomous outcomes.
    Nattino G; Finazzi S; Bertolini G
    Stat Med; 2014 Jun; 33(14):2390-407. PubMed ID: 24497413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prediction of 1-year mortality in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: validation of the logistic clinical SYNTAX (Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Interventions With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) score.
    Farooq V; Vergouwe Y; Généreux P; Bourantas CV; Palmerini T; Caixeta A; Garcìa-Garcìa HM; Diletti R; Morel MA; McAndrew TC; Kappetein AP; Valgimigli M; Windecker S; Dawkins KD; Steyerberg EW; Serruys PW; Stone GW
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jul; 6(7):737-45. PubMed ID: 23866185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.