405 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24549784)
1. Incorporating replacement free energy of binding-site waters in molecular docking.
Sun H; Zhao L; Peng S; Huang N
Proteins; 2014 Sep; 82(9):1765-76. PubMed ID: 24549784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. AutoDock-GIST: Incorporating Thermodynamics of Active-Site Water into Scoring Function for Accurate Protein-Ligand Docking.
Uehara S; Tanaka S
Molecules; 2016 Nov; 21(11):. PubMed ID: 27886114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Molecular docking with ligand attached water molecules.
Lie MA; Thomsen R; Pedersen CN; Schiøtt B; Christensen MH
J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Apr; 51(4):909-17. PubMed ID: 21452852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. PSI-DOCK: towards highly efficient and accurate flexible ligand docking.
Pei J; Wang Q; Liu Z; Li Q; Yang K; Lai L
Proteins; 2006 Mar; 62(4):934-46. PubMed ID: 16395666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. FDS: flexible ligand and receptor docking with a continuum solvent model and soft-core energy function.
Taylor RD; Jewsbury PJ; Essex JW
J Comput Chem; 2003 Oct; 24(13):1637-56. PubMed ID: 12926007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. WScore: A Flexible and Accurate Treatment of Explicit Water Molecules in Ligand-Receptor Docking.
Murphy RB; Repasky MP; Greenwood JR; Tubert-Brohman I; Jerome S; Annabhimoju R; Boyles NA; Schmitz CD; Abel R; Farid R; Friesner RA
J Med Chem; 2016 May; 59(9):4364-84. PubMed ID: 27054459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improving the scoring of protein-ligand binding affinity by including the effects of structural water and electronic polarization.
Liu J; He X; Zhang JZ
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Jun; 53(6):1306-14. PubMed ID: 23651068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance of MDockPP in CAPRI rounds 28-29 and 31-35 including the prediction of water-mediated interactions.
Xu X; Qiu L; Yan C; Ma Z; Grinter SZ; Zou X
Proteins; 2017 Mar; 85(3):424-434. PubMed ID: 27802576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Selecting an optimal number of binding site waters to improve virtual screening enrichments against the adenosine A2A receptor.
Lenselink EB; Beuming T; Sherman W; van Vlijmen HW; IJzerman AP
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jun; 54(6):1737-46. PubMed ID: 24835542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predicting fragment binding poses using a combined MCSS MM-GBSA approach.
Haider MK; Bertrand HO; Hubbard RE
J Chem Inf Model; 2011 May; 51(5):1092-105. PubMed ID: 21528911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Docking and free energy perturbation studies of ligand binding in the kappa opioid receptor.
Goldfeld DA; Murphy R; Kim B; Wang L; Beuming T; Abel R; Friesner RA
J Phys Chem B; 2015 Jan; 119(3):824-35. PubMed ID: 25395044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Carbohydrate-binding proteins: Dissecting ligand structures through solvent environment occupancy.
Gauto DF; Di Lella S; Guardia CM; Estrin DA; Martí MA
J Phys Chem B; 2009 Jun; 113(25):8717-24. PubMed ID: 19485380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. WaterScore: a novel method for distinguishing between bound and displaceable water molecules in the crystal structure of the binding site of protein-ligand complexes.
García-Sosa AT; Mancera RL; Dean PM
J Mol Model; 2003 Jun; 9(3):172-82. PubMed ID: 12756610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ligand-induced structural changes in TEM-1 probed by molecular dynamics and relative binding free energy calculations.
Pimenta AC; Martins JM; Fernandes R; Moreira IS
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Oct; 53(10):2648-58. PubMed ID: 23991837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Calculation of Thermodynamic Properties of Bound Water Molecules.
Yang Y; Abdallah AHA; Lill MA
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1762():389-402. PubMed ID: 29594782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of protein-protein docking model structures using all-atom molecular dynamics simulations combined with the solution theory in the energy representation.
Takemura K; Guo H; Sakuraba S; Matubayasi N; Kitao A
J Chem Phys; 2012 Dec; 137(21):215105. PubMed ID: 23231264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Simple, intuitive calculations of free energy of binding for protein-ligand complexes. 3. The free energy contribution of structural water molecules in HIV-1 protease complexes.
Fornabaio M; Spyrakis F; Mozzarelli A; Cozzini P; Abraham DJ; Kellogg GE
J Med Chem; 2004 Aug; 47(18):4507-16. PubMed ID: 15317462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Water Mapping and Scoring Approaches to Predict the Role of Hydration Sites in the Binding Affinity of PAK1 Inhibitors.
Biswal J; Jayaprakash P; Rayala SK; Venkatraman G; Rangasamy R; Poopandi S; Jeyakanthan J
Comb Chem High Throughput Screen; 2022; 25(4):660-676. PubMed ID: 33687876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hydration properties of ligands and drugs in protein binding sites: tightly-bound, bridging water molecules and their effects and consequences on molecular design strategies.
García-Sosa AT
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Jun; 53(6):1388-405. PubMed ID: 23662606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Molecular Dynamics in Mixed Solvents Reveals Protein-Ligand Interactions, Improves Docking, and Allows Accurate Binding Free Energy Predictions.
Arcon JP; Defelipe LA; Modenutti CP; López ED; Alvarez-Garcia D; Barril X; Turjanski AG; Martí MA
J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Apr; 57(4):846-863. PubMed ID: 28318252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
