BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24550562)

  • 1. Electronic patient information systems and care pathways: the organisational challenges of implementation and integration.
    Dent M; Tutt D
    Health Informatics J; 2014 Sep; 20(3):176-88. PubMed ID: 24550562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fitness for purpose when there are many different purposes: who are electronic patient records for?
    Eason K; Waterson P
    Health Informatics J; 2014 Sep; 20(3):189-98. PubMed ID: 24282190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Challenges to implementing the national programme for information technology (NPfIT): a qualitative study.
    Hendy J; Reeves BC; Fulop N; Hutchings A; Masseria C
    BMJ; 2005 Aug; 331(7512):331-6. PubMed ID: 16081447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Information for management--the extent of information management in the acute care hospital sector.
    Davies CA; Carson O
    Top Health Inf Manage; 1997 Nov; 18(2):12-23. PubMed ID: 10174725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electronic care records give nurses access to information that can transform patient care.
    Moore R; Stonham G
    Nurs Times; 2010 Apr 6-12; 106(13):8-9. PubMed ID: 20441106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Organizational learning in the implementation and adoption of national electronic health records: case studies of two hospitals participating in the National Programme for Information Technology in England.
    Takian A; Sheikh A; Barber N
    Health Informatics J; 2014 Sep; 20(3):199-212. PubMed ID: 25183608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modelling and implementing electronic health records in Denmark.
    Bernstein K; Bruun-Rasmussen M; Vingtoft S; Andersen SK; Nøhr C
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2003; 95():245-50. PubMed ID: 14663994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Methodological issues in the development of a national database for primary care groups and trusts.
    Hann M; Baker D; Hayes J; Wagner A; Barr R
    Health Soc Care Community; 2001 Sep; 9(5):286-93. PubMed ID: 11560744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Square pegs in round holes: information systems, hospitals and the significance of contextual awareness.
    Tjora AH; Scambler G
    Soc Sci Med; 2009 Feb; 68(3):519-25. PubMed ID: 19054601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Implementation of electronic medical records in hospitals: two case studies.
    Ovretveit J; Scott T; Rundall TG; Shortell SM; Brommels M
    Health Policy; 2007 Dec; 84(2-3):181-90. PubMed ID: 17624470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Strategies to accelerate translation of research into primary care within practices using electronic medical records.
    Nemeth LS; Wessell AM; Jenkins RG; Nietert PJ; Liszka HA; Ornstein SM
    J Nurs Care Qual; 2007; 22(4):343-9. PubMed ID: 17873732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
    Allen D; Rixson L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sharable EHR systems in Finland.
    Harno K; Ruotsalainen P
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 121():364-70. PubMed ID: 17095834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mobile agent application and integration in electronic anamnesis system.
    Liu CH; Chung YF; Chen TS; Wang SD
    J Med Syst; 2012 Jun; 36(3):1009-20. PubMed ID: 20703635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implications of an emerging EHR monoculture for hospitals and healthcare systems.
    Koppel R; Lehmann CU
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2015 Mar; 22(2):465-71. PubMed ID: 25342181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. IS/IT market support systems: augmenting UK primary health care groups.
    Dhillon G; Hackney R
    Top Health Inf Manage; 1999 Nov; 20(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 10662095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An analysis of electronic document management in oncology care.
    Poulter T; Gannon B; Bath PA
    Health Informatics J; 2012 Jun; 18(2):135-46. PubMed ID: 22733681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dissemination of electronic patient records using primary care referrals as a vector for change.
    Sands DZ; Rind DM; Safran C
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 84(Pt 1):685-9. PubMed ID: 11604825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A national survey of computerized decision support systems available to nurses in England.
    Mitchell N; Randell R; Foster R; Dowding D; Lattimer V; Thompson C; Cullum N; Summers R
    J Nurs Manag; 2009 Nov; 17(7):772-80. PubMed ID: 19793233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A study of user requests regarding the fully electronic health record system at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital: challenges for future electronic health record systems.
    Yoo S; Kim S; Lee S; Lee KH; Baek RM; Hwang H
    Int J Med Inform; 2013 May; 82(5):387-97. PubMed ID: 22959193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.