BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24552074)

  • 1. A disability critique of the new prenatal test for Down syndrome.
    Kaposy C
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2013 Dec; 23(4):299-324. PubMed ID: 24552074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The expressivist objection to prenatal testing: the experiences of families living with genetic disease.
    Boardman FK
    Soc Sci Med; 2014 Apr; 107():18-25. PubMed ID: 24602967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The problem with an almost-perfect genetic world.
    Harmon A
    N Y Times Web; 2005 Nov; ():WK1, WK14. PubMed ID: 16342438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. "This lifetime commitment": Public conceptions of disability and noninvasive prenatal genetic screening.
    Steinbach RJ; Allyse M; Michie M; Liu EY; Cho MK
    Am J Med Genet A; 2016 Feb; 170A(2):363-374. PubMed ID: 26566970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Expressivist objections to prenatal screening and testing: Perceptions of people living with disability.
    Boardman F; Thomas G
    Sociol Health Illn; 2023 Jul; 45(6):1223-1241. PubMed ID: 36181509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Disability, identity and the "expressivist objection".
    Edwards SD
    J Med Ethics; 2004 Aug; 30(4):418-20. PubMed ID: 15289542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genes and disability: questions at the crossroads.
    Crossley M; Shepherd L
    Fla State Univ Law Rev; 2003; 30(2):xi-xxiii. PubMed ID: 15083827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Non-invasive Genetic Prenatal Testing - A Serious Challenge for Society as a Whole].
    Zerres K
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2015 Apr; 219(2):69-72. PubMed ID: 25901867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Noninvasive prenatal genetic diagnosis: a bioethical reflection on the use of noninvasive prenatal diagnosis from the analysis of nucleic acids present in maternal peripheral blood].
    González-Melado FJ; Di Pietro ML
    Cuad Bioet; 2011; 22(74):49-75. PubMed ID: 21692554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Down Syndrome Information Act: Balancing the Advances of Prenatal Testing Through Public Policy.
    Leach MW
    Intellect Dev Disabil; 2016 Apr; 54(2):84-93. PubMed ID: 27028250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Trisomy 21 DNA test (MaterniT21) for detecting Down syndrome in the first trimester.
    Manag Care; 2012 Apr; 21(4):19-20. PubMed ID: 22593849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Chromosome Screening Using Noninvasive Prenatal Testing Beyond Trisomy-21: What to Screen for and Why It Matters.
    Hens K
    J Med Philos; 2018 Jan; 43(1):8-21. PubMed ID: 29300981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. When is the Promotion of Prenatal Testing for Selective Abortion Wrong?
    Perez Gomez J
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2020; 30(1):71-109. PubMed ID: 32336693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Emerging issues in genetic testing in Sri Lanka.
    de Silva D
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2007; 4(3):133-4. PubMed ID: 18624146
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. "The Top Priority Is a Healthy Baby": Narratives of Health, Disability, and Abortion in Online Pregnancy Forum Discussions in the US and China.
    Li G; Chandrasekharan S; Allyse M
    J Genet Couns; 2017 Feb; 26(1):32-39. PubMed ID: 27277130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Socially repugnant or the standard of care: Is there a distinction between sex-selective and ability-selective abortion?
    Lobo R; Genuis G
    Can Fam Physician; 2014 Mar; 60(3):212-6. PubMed ID: 24627369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reactions to prenatal testing: reflection of religiosity and attitudes toward abortion and people with disabilities.
    Bell M; Stoneman Z
    Am J Ment Retard; 2000 Jan; 105(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 10683704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Informed consent or institutionalized eugenics? How the medical profession encourages abortion of fetuses with Down syndrome.
    Dixon DP
    Issues Law Med; 2008; 24(1):3-59. PubMed ID: 18771038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy: a commentary by the Canadian Down Syndrome Society.
    Grant R; Flint K
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2007 Jul; 29(7):580-582. PubMed ID: 17623571
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Chloe's Law: A Powerful Legislative Movement Challenging a Core Ethical Norm of Genetic Testing.
    Caplan AL
    PLoS Biol; 2015 Aug; 13(8):e1002219. PubMed ID: 26247743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.