These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24552076)

  • 1. Expanding the frame of "voluntariness" in informed consent: structural coercion and the power of social and economic context.
    Fisher JA
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2013 Dec; 23(4):355-79. PubMed ID: 24552076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role and responsibilities of witnesses in the informed consent process.
    Angeles-Llerenas AR; Wirtz V; Lara-Alvarez CF
    Dev World Bioeth; 2009 Apr; 9(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 18370932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The perverse consequences of a proposed global tax on research.
    MacDonald C; Walton N
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jun; 10(6):46-7. PubMed ID: 20526972
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the morality of Guinea-pig recruitment.
    Valdman M
    Bioethics; 2010 Jul; 24(6):287-94. PubMed ID: 19222441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ethical considerations in phenomenological research.
    Walker W
    Nurse Res; 2007; 14(3):36-45. PubMed ID: 17494467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ethical rules for human subjects research: a case where the "is" must inform the "ought".
    Kon AA
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jun; 10(6):14-5. PubMed ID: 20526960
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The case for evidence-based rulemaking in human subjects research.
    Sachs B
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jun; 10(6):3-13. PubMed ID: 20526958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Money, coercion, and undue inducement: attitudes about payments to research participants.
    Largent EA; Grady C; Miller FG; Wertheimer A
    IRB; 2012; 34(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 22338401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Voluntariness of consent for research: an empirical and conceptual review.
    Nelson RM; Merz JF
    Med Care; 2002 Sep; 40(9 Suppl):V69-80. PubMed ID: 12226588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Voluntariness of consent to research: a conceptual model.
    Appelbaum PS; Lidz CW; Klitzman R
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2009; 39(1):30-9. PubMed ID: 19213193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clarifying confusions about coercion.
    Hawkins JS; Emanuel EJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2005; 35(5):16-9. PubMed ID: 16295260
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Unequal protection for patient rights: the divide between university and health ethics committees.
    Tolich M; Baldwin KM
    J Bioeth Inq; 2005; 2(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 16025617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Participants' responsibilities in clinical research.
    Resnik DB; Ness E
    J Med Ethics; 2012 Dec; 38(12):746-50. PubMed ID: 22822200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measuring voluntariness of consent to research: an instrument review.
    Mamotte N; Wassenaar D
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2015 Apr; 10(2):121-31. PubMed ID: 25742672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Obtaining informed consent and other ethical dilemmas.
    Ruth M; Guerrero-Cohen D
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2008; 5(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 18624157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Self-experimentation.
    Davis JK
    Account Res; 2003; 10(3):175-87. PubMed ID: 14979319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Limiting factors impacting on voluntary first person informed consent in the Philippines.
    Castillo FA
    Dev World Bioeth; 2002 May; 2(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 12872767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Making research a requirement of treatment: why we should sometimes let doctors pressure patients to participate in research.
    Orentlicher D
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2005; 35(5):20-8. PubMed ID: 16295261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The welcome reassessment of research ethics: is "undue inducement" suspect?
    Brody H
    Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):15-6. PubMed ID: 16179298
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How not to rethink research ethics.
    Beauchamp TL
    Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):31-3; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.