These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24552131)
21. Use of confocal microscopy for quantification of plastic remnants on rough titanium after instrumentation and evaluation of efficacy of removal. Yang SM; Park JB; Ko Y Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(3):519-25. PubMed ID: 26009902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of the impact of scaler material composition on polished titanium implant abutment surfaces. Hasturk H; Nguyen DH; Sherzai H; Song X; Soukos N; Bidlack FB; Van Dyke TE J Dent Hyg; 2013 Aug; 87(4):200-11. PubMed ID: 23986413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. In Vitro Comparison of Titanium Disc Surface Roughness and Bacterial Colonization After Ultrasonic Instrumentation With Three Different Tips. Kitaygorodskiy A; Gregory RL; Lim G; Hamada Y J Oral Implantol; 2024 Oct; 50(5):537-543. PubMed ID: 39023858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The effect of five mechanical instrumentation protocols on implant surface topography and roughness: A scanning electron microscope and confocal laser scanning microscope analysis. Cha JK; Paeng K; Jung UW; Choi SH; Sanz M; Sanz-MartÃn I Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Jun; 30(6):578-587. PubMed ID: 31022305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. In vitro studies on the effect of cleaning methods on different implant surfaces. Augthun M; Tinschert J; Huber A J Periodontol; 1998 Aug; 69(8):857-64. PubMed ID: 9736367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The surface characteristics produced by various oral hygiene instruments and materials on titanium implant abutments. Rapley JW; Swan RH; Hallmon WW; Mills MP Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1990; 5(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 2202669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Efficacy of Removal of Residual Dental Cement by Laser, Ultrasonic Scalers, and Titanium Curette: An In Vitro Study. Fletcher P; Linden E; Cobb C; Zhao D; Rubin J; Planzos P Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2021 May; 42(5):e5-e9. PubMed ID: 33980017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effects of an Er:YAG laser and the Vector ultrasonic system on the biocompatibility of titanium implants in cultures of human osteoblast-like cells. Schwarz F; Rothamel D; Sculean A; Georg T; Scherbaum W; Becker J Clin Oral Implants Res; 2003 Dec; 14(6):784-92. PubMed ID: 15015956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [In vitro effects on rough implant surfaces of different instrumentations used in the surgical therapy of peri-implantitis]. Espedito Di Lauro A; Morgese F; Squillace A; Ramaglia L Minerva Stomatol; 2003; 52(1-2):1-7. PubMed ID: 12686908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Surface alterations of several dental materials by a novel ultrasonic scaler tip. Seol HW; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim SK; Baek SH; Lee SY Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(4):801-10. PubMed ID: 22848881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The effects of mechanical instruments on contaminated titanium dental implant surfaces: a systematic review. Louropoulou A; Slot DE; Van der Weijden F Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Oct; 25(10):1149-60. PubMed ID: 23834327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Influence of eight debridement techniques on three different titanium surfaces: A laboratory study. Tran C; Khan A; Meredith N; Walsh LJ Int J Dent Hyg; 2023 Feb; 21(1):238-250. PubMed ID: 35943293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. High speed imaging of biofilm removal from a dental implant model using ultrasonic cavitation. Vyas N; Grewal M; Kuehne SA; Sammons RL; Walmsley AD Dent Mater; 2020 Jun; 36(6):733-743. PubMed ID: 32299665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluation of different methods to clean titanium abutments. A scanning electron microscopic study. Speelman JA; Collaert B; Klinge B Clin Oral Implants Res; 1992 Sep; 3(3):120-7. PubMed ID: 1290792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The effects of scaling a titanium implant surface with metal and plastic instruments: an in vitro study. Fox SC; Moriarty JD; Kusy RP J Periodontol; 1990 Aug; 61(8):485-90. PubMed ID: 2202807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effects of 10 cleaning instruments on four different implant surfaces. Schmage P; Thielemann J; Nergiz I; Scorziello TM; Pfeiffer P Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):308-17. PubMed ID: 22442769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effects of Mechanical Instrumentation with Commercially Available Instruments Used in Supportive Peri-implant Therapy: An In Vitro Study. Sirinirund B; Garaicoa-Pazmino C; Wang HL Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(6):1370-1378. PubMed ID: 31711078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. In-vitro effects of novel periodontal scalers with a planar ultrasonic piezoelectric transducer on periodontal biofilm removal, dentine surface roughness, and periodontal ligament fibroblasts adhesion. Berto LA; Ettmayer JB; Stutzer D; Nietzsche S; Niederhauser T; Burger J; Sculean A; Eick S; Hofmann M Clin Oral Investig; 2024 May; 28(5):294. PubMed ID: 38698252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Implant surface alterations from a nonmetallic ultrasonic tip. Bailey GM; Gardner JS; Day MH; Kovanda BJ J West Soc Periodontol Periodontal Abstr; 1998; 46(3):69-73. PubMed ID: 10597152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]