These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24552278)

  • 1. Rejection of trace organic compounds by forward osmosis membranes: a literature review.
    Coday BD; Yaffe BG; Xu P; Cath TY
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Apr; 48(7):3612-24. PubMed ID: 24552278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comprehensive bench- and pilot-scale investigation of trace organic compounds rejection by forward osmosis.
    Hancock NT; Xu P; Heil DM; Bellona C; Cath TY
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Oct; 45(19):8483-90. PubMed ID: 21838294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Removal of trace organic chemicals and performance of a novel hybrid ultrafiltration-osmotic membrane bioreactor.
    Holloway RW; Regnery J; Nghiem LD; Cath TY
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Sep; 48(18):10859-68. PubMed ID: 25113310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Online monitoring of N-nitrosodimethylamine rejection as a performance indicator of trace organic chemical removal by reverse osmosis.
    Fujioka T; Takeuchi H; Tanaka H; Kodamatani H
    Chemosphere; 2018 Jun; 200():80-85. PubMed ID: 29475031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recovering nutrients and rejecting trace organic compounds in human urine by a forward osmosis-membrane distillation (FO-MD) hybrid system.
    Gau C; Sato S; Zhang D; Ishibashi Y; Kobayashi J
    Water Sci Technol; 2022 Oct; 86(8):1904-1914. PubMed ID: 36315084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Trace organic solutes in closed-loop forward osmosis applications: influence of membrane fouling and modeling of solute build-up.
    D'Haese A; Le-Clech P; Van Nevel S; Verbeken K; Cornelissen ER; Khan SJ; Verliefde AR
    Water Res; 2013 Sep; 47(14):5232-44. PubMed ID: 23866149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the removal of hydrophobic trace organic contaminants by forward osmosis and reverse osmosis.
    Xie M; Nghiem LD; Price WE; Elimelech M
    Water Res; 2012 May; 46(8):2683-92. PubMed ID: 22402269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rejection of micropollutants by clean and fouled forward osmosis membrane.
    Valladares Linares R; Yangali-Quintanilla V; Li Z; Amy G
    Water Res; 2011 Dec; 45(20):6737-44. PubMed ID: 22055122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hg removal and the effects of coexisting metals in forward osmosis and membrane distillation.
    Wu CY; Chen SS; Zhang DZ; Kobayashi J
    Water Sci Technol; 2017 Jun; 75(11-12):2622-2630. PubMed ID: 28617282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Removal of organic micro-pollutants (phenol, aniline and nitrobenzene) via forward osmosis (FO) process: Evaluation of FO as an alternative method to reverse osmosis (RO).
    Cui Y; Liu XY; Chung TS; Weber M; Staudt C; Maletzko C
    Water Res; 2016 Mar; 91():104-14. PubMed ID: 26773492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fouling propensity of forward osmosis: investigation of the slower flux decline phenomenon.
    Lay WC; Chong TH; Tang CY; Fane AG; Zhang J; Liu Y
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(4):927-36. PubMed ID: 20182071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Potable-quality water recovery from primary effluent through a coupled algal-osmosis membrane system.
    Jiang W; Lin L; Gedara SMH; Schaub TM; Jarvis JM; Wang X; Xu X; Nirmalakhandan N; Xu P
    Chemosphere; 2020 Feb; 240():124883. PubMed ID: 31726606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Organic fouling of thin-film composite polyamide and cellulose triacetate forward osmosis membranes by oppositely charged macromolecules.
    Gu Y; Wang YN; Wei J; Tang CY
    Water Res; 2013 Apr; 47(5):1867-74. PubMed ID: 23384517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Application of forward osmosis membrane technology for oil sands process-affected water desalination.
    Jiang Y; Liang J; Liu Y
    Water Sci Technol; 2016; 73(8):1809-16. PubMed ID: 27120634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Removal of natural steroid hormones from wastewater using membrane contactor processes.
    Cartinella JL; Cath TY; Flynn MT; Miller GC; Hunter KW; Childress AE
    Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Dec; 40(23):7381-6. PubMed ID: 17180992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rejection of pharmaceuticals by forward osmosis membranes.
    Jin X; Shan J; Wang C; Wei J; Tang CY
    J Hazard Mater; 2012 Aug; 227-228():55-61. PubMed ID: 22640821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of ozone and ozone/peroxide on trace organic contaminants and NDMA in drinking water and water reuse applications.
    Pisarenko AN; Stanford BD; Yan D; Gerrity D; Snyder SA
    Water Res; 2012 Feb; 46(2):316-26. PubMed ID: 22137292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. High rejection reverse osmosis membrane for removal of N-nitrosamines and their precursors.
    Fujioka T; Ishida KP; Shintani T; Kodamatani H
    Water Res; 2018 Mar; 131():45-51. PubMed ID: 29268083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Boric acid permeation in forward osmosis membrane processes: modeling, experiments, and implications.
    Jin X; Tang CY; Gu Y; She Q; Qi S
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Mar; 45(6):2323-30. PubMed ID: 21329347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Osmotic versus conventional membrane bioreactors integrated with reverse osmosis for water reuse: Biological stability, membrane fouling, and contaminant removal.
    Luo W; Phan HV; Xie M; Hai FI; Price WE; Elimelech M; Nghiem LD
    Water Res; 2017 Feb; 109():122-134. PubMed ID: 27883917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.