These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24552679)

  • 21. Lexical effects on spoken word recognition performance among Mandarin-speaking children with normal hearing and cochlear implants.
    Wang NM; Wu CM; Kirk KI
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2010 Aug; 74(8):883-90. PubMed ID: 20846499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The resolution of complex spectral patterns by cochlear implant and normal-hearing listeners.
    Henry BA; Turner CW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 May; 113(5):2861-73. PubMed ID: 12765402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Distortion of Spectral Ripples Through Cochlear Implants Has Major Implications for Interpreting Performance Scores.
    Winn MB; O'Brien G
    Ear Hear; 2022; 43(3):764-772. PubMed ID: 34966157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Spectral and temporal measures in hybrid cochlear implant users: on the mechanism of electroacoustic hearing benefits.
    Golub JS; Won JH; Drennan WR; Worman TD; Rubinstein JT
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Feb; 33(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 22215451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Spectral-Temporal Modulated Ripple Discrimination by Children With Cochlear Implants.
    Landsberger DM; Padilla M; Martinez AS; Eisenberg LS
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(1):60-68. PubMed ID: 28682810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Can unaided non-linguistic measures predict cochlear implant candidacy?
    Shim HJ; Won JH; Moon IJ; Anderson ES; Drennan WR; McIntosh NE; Weaver EM; Rubinstein JT
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Sep; 35(8):1345-53. PubMed ID: 24901669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Timbre and speech perception in bimodal and bilateral cochlear-implant listeners.
    Kong YY; Mullangi A; Marozeau J
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):645-59. PubMed ID: 22677814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cognitive factors contribute to speech perception in cochlear-implant users and age-matched normal-hearing listeners under vocoded conditions.
    O'Neill ER; Kreft HA; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Jul; 146(1):195. PubMed ID: 31370651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cochlear implant users' spectral ripple resolution.
    Jeon EK; Turner CW; Karsten SA; Henry BA; Gantz BJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Oct; 138(4):2350-8. PubMed ID: 26520316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Psychoacoustic and Demographic Factors for Speech Recognition of Older Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
    Luo X; Kolberg C; Pulling KR; Azuma T
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Jun; 63(6):1712-1725. PubMed ID: 32501736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Deactivating stimulation sites based on low-rate thresholds improves spectral ripple and speech reception thresholds in cochlear implant users.
    Zhou N
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):EL243. PubMed ID: 28372106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Development and validation of a spectro-temporal processing test for cochlear-implant listeners.
    Archer-Boyd AW; Southwell RV; Deeks JM; Turner RE; Carlyon RP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Nov; 144(5):2983. PubMed ID: 30522311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Fitting prelingually deafened adult cochlear implant users based on electrode discrimination performance.
    Debruyne JA; Francart T; Janssen AM; Douma K; Brokx JP
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Mar; 56(3):174-185. PubMed ID: 27758152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Relationship among the physiologic channel interactions, spectral-ripple discrimination, and vowel identification in cochlear implant users.
    Won JH; Humphrey EL; Yeager KR; Martinez AA; Robinson CH; Mills KE; Johnstone PM; Moon IJ; Woo J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Nov; 136(5):2714-25. PubMed ID: 25373971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Behavioral Measures of Temporal Processing and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Blankenship C; Zhang F; Keith R
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Oct; 27(9):701-713. PubMed ID: 27718347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of age and hearing mechanism on spectral resolution in normal hearing and cochlear-implanted listeners.
    Horn DL; Dudley DJ; Dedhia K; Nie K; Drennan WR; Won JH; Rubinstein JT; Werner LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jan; 141(1):613. PubMed ID: 28147578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Learning Effects in Psychophysical Tests of Spectral and Temporal Resolution.
    de Jong MAM; Briaire JJ; Frijns JHM
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(3):475-481. PubMed ID: 28953491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Temporal Sensitivity Measured Shortly After Cochlear Implantation Predicts 6-Month Speech Recognition Outcome.
    Erb J; Ludwig AA; Kunke D; Fuchs M; Obleser J
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 29697465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Examining the Relationship Between Speech Recognition and a Spectral-Temporal Test With a Mixed Group of Hearing Aid and Cochlear Implant Users.
    Aronoff JM; Duitsman L; Matusik DK; Hussain S; Lippmann E
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Mar; 64(3):1073-1080. PubMed ID: 33719538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Does quality of life depend on speech recognition performance for adult cochlear implant users?
    Capretta NR; Moberly AC
    Laryngoscope; 2016 Mar; 126(3):699-706. PubMed ID: 26256441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.