220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24552686)
1. A modified Wald interval for the area under the ROC curve (AUC) in diagnostic case-control studies.
Kottas M; Kuss O; Zapf A
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Feb; 14():26. PubMed ID: 24552686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of confidence/credible interval methods for the area under the ROC curve for continuous diagnostic tests with small sample size.
Feng D; Cortese G; Baumgartner R
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Dec; 26(6):2603-2621. PubMed ID: 26323286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Confidence intervals of the difference between areas under two ROC curves in matched-pair experiments.
Zhang Y; Tang N
Stat Med; 2020 Sep; 39(20):2621-2638. PubMed ID: 32390284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A wild bootstrap approach for the selection of biomarkers in early diagnostic trials.
Zapf A; Brunner E; Konietschke F
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 May; 15():43. PubMed ID: 25925052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. On the exact interval estimation for the difference in paired areas under the ROC curves.
Li CR; Liao CT; Liu JP
Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):224-42. PubMed ID: 17139702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Comparison of 7 methods for sample size determination based on confidence interval estimation for a single proportion].
Yu M; Shi X; Zou B; An S
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2023 Jan; 43(1):105-110. PubMed ID: 36856217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Recommendations for reporting measures of diagnostic accuracy.
Vrbin CM
Cytopathology; 2023 May; 34(3):185-190. PubMed ID: 36648307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimating the Area Under ROC Curve When the Fitted Binormal Curves Demonstrate Improper Shape.
Bandos AI; Guo B; Gur D
Acad Radiol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):209-219. PubMed ID: 27884464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of non-parametric confidence intervals for the area under the ROC curve of a continuous-scale diagnostic test.
Gengsheng Qin ; Hotilovac L
Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Apr; 17(2):207-21. PubMed ID: 18426855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Confidence Intervals for the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve in the Presence of Ignorable Missing Data.
Cho H; Matthews GJ; Harel O
Int Stat Rev; 2019 Apr; 87(1):152-177. PubMed ID: 31007356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interval estimation for the difference in paired areas under the ROC curves in the absence of a gold standard test.
Hsieh HN; Su HY; Zhou XH
Stat Med; 2009 Nov; 28(25):3108-23. PubMed ID: 19691022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Empirical likelihood inference for the area under the ROC curve.
Qin G; Zhou XH
Biometrics; 2006 Jun; 62(2):613-22. PubMed ID: 16918927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analysis of correlated ROC areas in diagnostic testing.
Song HH
Biometrics; 1997 Mar; 53(1):370-82. PubMed ID: 9147602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Joint confidence region estimation for area under ROC curve and Youden index.
Yin J; Tian L
Stat Med; 2014 Mar; 33(6):985-1000. PubMed ID: 24123069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Jackknife variance of the partial area under the empirical receiver operating characteristic curve.
Bandos AI; Guo B; Gur D
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Apr; 26(2):528-541. PubMed ID: 25228637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of semiparametric, parametric, and nonparametric ROC analysis for continuous diagnostic tests using a simulation study and acute coronary syndrome data.
Colak E; Mutlu F; Bal C; Oner S; Ozdamar K; Gok B; Cavusoglu Y
Comput Math Methods Med; 2012; 2012():698320. PubMed ID: 22844346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Confidence interval construction for the difference between two correlated proportions with missing observations.
Tang NS; Li HQ; Tang ML; Li J
J Biopharm Stat; 2016; 26(2):323-38. PubMed ID: 25632882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Direct estimation of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in the presence of verification bias.
He H; Lyness JM; McDermott MP
Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(3):361-76. PubMed ID: 18680124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sample size determination for diagnostic accuracy studies involving binormal ROC curve indices.
Obuchowski NA; McClish DK
Stat Med; 1997 Jul; 16(13):1529-42. PubMed ID: 9249923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. True verification probabilities should not be used in estimating the area under receiver operating characteristic curve.
Wu Y
Stat Med; 2020 Nov; 39(27):3937-3946. PubMed ID: 32725910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
