These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24553849)

  • 1. Evidence-based evaluation of information: the centrality and limitations of systematic reviews.
    Järvholm B; Bohlin I
    Scand J Public Health; 2014 Mar; 42(13 Suppl):3-10. PubMed ID: 24553849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
    Allen D; Rixson L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Systematic mixed-methods reviews are not ready to be assessed with the available tools.
    Bouchard K; Dubuisson W; Simard J; Dorval M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Aug; 64(8):926-8. PubMed ID: 21474281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Methodological pluralism in the age of evidence-informed practice and policy.
    Shlonsky A; Mildon R
    Scand J Public Health; 2014 Mar; 42(13 Suppl):18-27. PubMed ID: 24553851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: scientific rationale and interpretation.
    Ferreira González I; Urrútia G; Alonso-Coello P
    Rev Esp Cardiol; 2011 Aug; 64(8):688-96. PubMed ID: 21719182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Systematic reviews showed insufficient evidence for clinical practice in 2004: what about in 2011? The next appeal for the evidence-based medicine age.
    Villas Boas PJ; Spagnuolo RS; Kamegasawa A; Braz LG; Polachini do Valle A; Jorge EC; Yoo HH; Cataneo AJ; Corrêa I; Fukushima FB; do Nascimento P; Módolo NS; Teixeira MS; de Oliveira Vidal EI; Daher SR; El Dib R
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2013 Aug; 19(4):633-7. PubMed ID: 22747638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The evidence for nursing interventions in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
    Mistiaen P; Poot E; Hickox S; Wagner C
    Nurse Res; 2004; 12(2):71-80. PubMed ID: 15636007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cochrane reviews used more rigorous methods than non-Cochrane reviews: survey of systematic reviews in physiotherapy.
    Moseley AM; Elkins MR; Herbert RD; Maher CG; Sherrington C
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Oct; 62(10):1021-30. PubMed ID: 19282144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. From randomized controlled trials to evidence grading schemes: current state of evidence-based practice in social sciences.
    Boruch R; Rui N
    J Evid Based Med; 2008 Nov; 1(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 21348975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations.
    Manchikanti L
    Pain Physician; 2008; 11(2):161-86. PubMed ID: 18354710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Systematic reviews explained: AMSTAR-how to tell the good from the bad and the ugly.
    Sharif MO; Janjua-Sharif FN; Ali H; Ahmed F
    Oral Health Dent Manag; 2013 Mar; 12(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 23474576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evidence-based knowledge in the context of social practice.
    Mullen EJ
    Scand J Public Health; 2014 Mar; 42(13 Suppl):59-73. PubMed ID: 24553855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. There is inadequate evidence to determine the effectiveness of nonpharmacological and nonsurgical interventions for hand osteoarthritis: an overview of high-quality systematic reviews.
    Moe RH; Kjeken I; Uhlig T; Hagen KB
    Phys Ther; 2009 Dec; 89(12):1363-70. PubMed ID: 19850713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A framework for best evidence approaches can improve the transparency of systematic reviews.
    Treadwell JR; Singh S; Talati R; McPheeters ML; Reston JT
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Nov; 65(11):1159-62. PubMed ID: 23017634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Organisation of evidence-based knowledge production: evidence hierarchies and evidence typologies.
    Hansen HF
    Scand J Public Health; 2014 Mar; 42(13 Suppl):11-7. PubMed ID: 24553850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Systematic reviews synthesized evidence without consistent quality assessment of primary studies examining epidemiology of chronic diseases.
    Shamliyan T; Kane RL; Jansen S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Jun; 65(6):610-8. PubMed ID: 22424987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Deconstructing evidence in orthodontics: making sense of systematic reviews, randomized clinical trials, and meta-analyses.
    Rinchuse DJ; Rinchuse DJ; Kandasamy S; Ackerman MB
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 18575311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.