282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2455410)
1. Contact thermography for assessment of skin damage due to experimental irritants.
Agner T; Serup J
Acta Derm Venereol; 1988; 68(3):192-5. PubMed ID: 2455410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Skin reactions to irritants assessed by polysulfide rubber replica.
Agner T; Serup J
Contact Dermatitis; 1987 Oct; 17(4):205-11. PubMed ID: 3427947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 'Irritants' increase the response to an allergen in allergic contact dermatitis.
McLelland J; Shuster S; Matthews JN
Arch Dermatol; 1991 Jul; 127(7):1016-9. PubMed ID: 2064399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Susceptibility to primary irritants: age dependence and relation to contact allergic reactions.
Coenraads PJ; Bleumink E; Nater JP
Contact Dermatitis; 1975 Dec; 1(6):377-81. PubMed ID: 1235298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differential patterns of epidermal leukocyte infiltration in patch test reactions to structurally unrelated chemical irritants.
Willis CM; Stephens CJ; Wilkinson JD
J Invest Dermatol; 1993 Sep; 101(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 8370975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Simultaneous sodium lauryl sulphate testing improves the diagnostic validity of allergic patch tests. Results from a prospective multicentre study of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe, DKG).
Löffler H; Becker D; Brasch J; Geier J;
Br J Dermatol; 2005 Apr; 152(4):709-19. PubMed ID: 15840103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reduced levels of glutathione S-transferases in patch test reactions to dithranol and sodium lauryl sulphate as demonstrated by quantitative immunocytochemistry: evidence for oxidative stress in acute irritant contact dermatitis.
Willis CM; Britton LE; Reiche L; Wilkinson JD
Eur J Dermatol; 2001; 11(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 11275802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Telethermography: an objective method for evaluating patch test reactions.
Laino L; Di Carlo A
Eur J Dermatol; 2010; 20(2):175-80. PubMed ID: 20123644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of ultraviolet B on nonimmunologic contact reactions induced by dimethyl sulphoxide, phenol and sodium lauryl sulphate.
Larmi E; Lahti A; Hannuksela M
Photodermatol; 1989 Dec; 6(6):258-62. PubMed ID: 2636980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pathological findings in cumulative irritation induced by SLS and croton oil in hairless mice.
Moon SH; Seo KI; Han WS; Suh DH; Cho KH; Kim JJ; Eun HC
Contact Dermatitis; 2001 Apr; 44(4):240-5. PubMed ID: 11260241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Epidermal damage induced by irritants in man: a light and electron microscopic study.
Willis CM; Stephens CJ; Wilkinson JD
J Invest Dermatol; 1989 Nov; 93(5):695-9. PubMed ID: 2794551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correlation of impedance response patterns to histological findings in irritant skin reactions induced by various surfactants.
Nicander I; Ollmar S; Eek A; Lundh Rozell B; Emtestam L
Br J Dermatol; 1996 Feb; 134(2):221-8. PubMed ID: 8746333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Experimentally-induced irritant contact dermatitis. Determination of optimum irritant concentrations.
Willis CM; Stephens JM; Wilkinson JD
Contact Dermatitis; 1988 Jan; 18(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 3349774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fruit acids and sodium hydroxide in the food industry and their combined effect with sodium lauryl sulphate: controlled in vivo tandem irritation study.
Fluhr JW; Bankova L; Fuchs S; Kelterer D; Schliemann-Willers S; Norgauer J; Kleesz P; Grieshaber R; Elsner P
Br J Dermatol; 2004 Nov; 151(5):1039-48. PubMed ID: 15541082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intra-individual variation of irritant threshold and relationship to transepidermal water loss measurement of skin irritation.
Smith HR; Rowson M; Basketter DA; McFadden JP
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Jul; 51(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 15291829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sequential application of cold and sodium lauryl sulphate decreases irritation and barrier disruption in vivo in humans.
Fluhr JW; Bornkessel A; Akengin A; Fuchs S; Norgauer J; Kleesz P; Grieshaber R; Elsner P
Br J Dermatol; 2005 Apr; 152(4):702-8. PubMed ID: 15840102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The MOAHLFA index of irritant sodium lauryl sulfate reactions: first results of a multicentre study on routine sodium lauryl sulfate patch testing.
Uter W; Geier J; Becker D; Brasch J; Löffler H
Contact Dermatitis; 2004; 51(5-6):259-62. PubMed ID: 15606650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. On the course of the irritant reaction after irritation with sodium lauryl sulphate.
Gloor M; Senger B; Langenauer M; Fluhr JW
Skin Res Technol; 2004 Aug; 10(3):144-8. PubMed ID: 15225263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fluorescence confocal laser scanning microscopy for in vivo imaging of epidermal reactions to two experimental irritants.
Suihko C; Serup J
Skin Res Technol; 2008 Nov; 14(4):498-503. PubMed ID: 18937788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Skin reactions to irritants assessed by non-invasive bioengineering methods.
Agner T; Serup J
Contact Dermatitis; 1989 May; 20(5):352-9. PubMed ID: 2670419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
