These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24554146)

  • 1. A framework to predict the impacts of shale gas infrastructures on the forest fragmentation of an agroforest region.
    Racicot A; Babin-Roussel V; Dauphinais JF; Joly JS; Noël P; Lavoie C
    Environ Manage; 2014 May; 53(5):1023-33. PubMed ID: 24554146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Linear infrastructure drives habitat conversion and forest fragmentation associated with Marcellus shale gas development in a forested landscape.
    Langlois LA; Drohan PJ; Brittingham MC
    J Environ Manage; 2017 Jul; 197():167-176. PubMed ID: 28371760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Early trends in landcover change and forest fragmentation due to shale-gas development in Pennsylvania: a potential outcome for the Northcentral Appalachians.
    Drohan PJ; Brittingham M; Bishop J; Yoder K
    Environ Manage; 2012 May; 49(5):1061-75. PubMed ID: 22447181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The costs of avoiding environmental impacts from shale-gas surface infrastructure.
    Milt AW; Gagnolet TD; Armsworth PR
    Conserv Biol; 2016 Dec; 30(6):1151-1158. PubMed ID: 27232111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Habitat loss and modification due to gas development in the Fayetteville shale.
    Moran MD; Cox AB; Wells RL; Benichou CC; McClung MR
    Environ Manage; 2015 Jun; 55(6):1276-84. PubMed ID: 25566834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Synergies and Tradeoffs Among Environmental Impacts Under Conservation Planning of Shale Gas Surface Infrastructure.
    Milt AW; Gagnolet T; Armsworth PR
    Environ Manage; 2016 Jan; 57(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 26275668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of shale gas development on core forests in the subtropical karst region in southwestern China.
    Guo Y; Du X; Chen H; Zheng G; Zhang X; Wang Q
    Sci Total Environ; 2021 Jun; 771():145287. PubMed ID: 33540159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Land Cover Change Associated with Unconventional Oil and Gas Development in the Appalachian Region.
    Grushecky ST; Harris KJ; Strager MP; Wang J; Mesa AN
    Environ Manage; 2022 Nov; 70(5):869-880. PubMed ID: 36036276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Forecasting long-term gas production from shale.
    Cueto-Felgueroso L; Juanes R
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 Dec; 110(49):19660-1. PubMed ID: 24277849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influences of shale gas well-pad development on land use and vegetation biomass in a shale gas mining area.
    Chen HK; DU XY; Guo Y; Zhang XY; Wu Q; Wang QB; He JA; Ma L
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2018 Oct; 29(10):3377-3384. PubMed ID: 30325163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Chemical hazards arising from shale gas extraction].
    Pakulska D
    Med Pr; 2015; 66(1):99-117. PubMed ID: 26016049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ecological risks of shale oil and gas development to wildlife, aquatic resources and their habitats.
    Brittingham MC; Maloney KO; Farag AM; Harper DD; Bowen ZH
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Oct; 48(19):11034-47. PubMed ID: 25188826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gas production in the Barnett Shale obeys a simple scaling theory.
    Patzek TW; Male F; Marder M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 Dec; 110(49):19731-6. PubMed ID: 24248376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How newly developed shale gas facilities influence soil erosion in a karst region in SW China.
    Guo Y; Du X; Li D; Zheng G; Zhang X; Chen H; Zheng J
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Apr; 818():151825. PubMed ID: 34826475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Human exposure to unconventional natural gas development: A public health demonstration of periodic high exposure to chemical mixtures in ambient air.
    Brown DR; Lewis C; Weinberger BI
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2015; 50(5):460-72. PubMed ID: 25734822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of shale gas development on water resources: a case study in northern poland.
    Vandecasteele I; Marí Rivero I; Sala S; Baranzelli C; Barranco R; Batelaan O; Lavalle C
    Environ Manage; 2015 Jun; 55(6):1285-99. PubMed ID: 25877457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Considerations for the development of shale gas in the United Kingdom.
    Hays J; Finkel ML; Depledge M; Law A; Shonkoff SBC
    Sci Total Environ; 2015 Apr; 512-513():36-42. PubMed ID: 25613768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mapping the optimal forest road network based on the multicriteria evaluation technique: the case study of Mediterranean Island of Thassos in Greece.
    Tampekis S; Sakellariou S; Samara F; Sfougaris A; Jaeger D; Christopoulou O
    Environ Monit Assess; 2015 Nov; 187(11):687. PubMed ID: 26463090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Seismic line impacts on proximal boreal forest and wetland environments in Alberta.
    Abib TH; Chasmer L; Hopkinson C; Mahoney C; Rodriguez LCE
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Mar; 658():1601-1613. PubMed ID: 30678017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mobile measurement of methane and hydrogen sulfide at natural gas production site fence lines in the Texas Barnett Shale.
    Eapi GR; Sabnis MS; Sattler ML
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2014 Aug; 64(8):927-44. PubMed ID: 25185395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.