139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24554954)
1. Diagnostic accuracy of maternal anthropometric measurements as predictors for dystocia in nulliparous women.
Alijahan R; Kordi M; Poorjavad M; Ebrahimzadeh S
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res; 2014 Jan; 19(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 24554954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The diagnostic accuracy of external pelvimetry and maternal height to predict dystocia in nulliparous women: a study in Cameroon.
Rozenholc AT; Ako SN; Leke RJ; Boulvain M
BJOG; 2007 May; 114(5):630-5. PubMed ID: 17439570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk factors of dystocia in nulliparous women.
Alijahan R; Kordi M
Iran J Med Sci; 2014 May; 39(3):254-60. PubMed ID: 24850982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Maternal height and external pelvimetry to predict cephalopelvic disproportion in nulliparous African women: a cohort study.
Liselele HB; Boulvain M; Tshibangu KC; Meuris S
BJOG; 2000 Aug; 107(8):947-52. PubMed ID: 10955423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Vitamin D deficiency in pregnancy is not associated with obstructed labor. A study among Pakistani women in Karachi.
Brunvand L; Shah SS; Bergström S; Haug E
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1998 Mar; 77(3):303-6. PubMed ID: 9539276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [External anthropometric measurement and pelvimetry among nulliparous women in Lubumbashi: risk factors and predictive score of mechanical dystocia].
Malonga FK; Mukuku O; Ngalula MT; Luhete PK; Kakoma JB
Pan Afr Med J; 2018; 31():69. PubMed ID: 31007816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Do neonatal birth weight thresholds for labor dystocia outcomes differ between short and normal stature women?
Cohen G; Schreiber H; Shalev-Ram H; Biron-Shental T; Kovo M
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2023 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 37740684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Neonatal head circumference to maternal mid-transverse pelvic distance ratio as a key anatomical predictor for dystocia: Retrospective case-control study.
Baek MJ; Na ED; Lee H; Park SH; Kim S; Kim T; Jung SH; Jang JH
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38777330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prediction of cesarean delivery in the term nulliparous woman: results from the prospective, multicenter Genesis study.
Burke N; Burke G; Breathnach F; McAuliffe F; Morrison JJ; Turner M; Dornan S; Higgins JR; Cotter A; Geary M; McParland P; Daly S; Cody F; Dicker P; Tully E; Malone FD;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 216(6):598.e1-598.e11. PubMed ID: 28213060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Labor progress determined by ultrasound is different in women requiring cesarean delivery from those who experience a vaginal delivery following induction of labor.
Tse WT; Chaemsaithong P; Chan WWY; Kwan AHW; Huang J; Appiah K; Chong KC; Poon LC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 221(4):335.e1-335.e18. PubMed ID: 31153931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Association between external pelvimetry and vertex delivery complications in African women.
Liselele HB; Tshibangu CK; Meuris S
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2000 Aug; 79(8):673-8. PubMed ID: 10949233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Magnetic resonance imaging pelvimetry and the prediction of labor dystocia.
Zaretsky MV; Alexander JM; McIntire DD; Hatab MR; Twickler DM; Leveno KJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Nov; 106(5 Pt 1):919-26. PubMed ID: 16260507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cesarean section indications and anthropometric parameters in Rwandan nulliparae: preliminary results from a longitudinal survey.
Kakoma JB
Pan Afr Med J; 2016; 24():310. PubMed ID: 28154665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Incidence and outcomes of dystocia in the active phase of labor in term nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset.
Kjaergaard H; Olsen J; Ottesen B; Dykes AK
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(4):402-7. PubMed ID: 19330572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fetal descent in nulliparous women assessed by ultrasound: a longitudinal study.
Hjartardóttir H; Lund SH; Benediktsdóttir S; Geirsson RT; Eggebø TM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 224(4):378.e1-378.e15. PubMed ID: 33039395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Anthropometric measurements as predictors of cephalopelvic disproportion: Can the diagnostic accuracy be improved?
Benjamin SJ; Daniel AB; Kamath A; Ramkumar V
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2012 Jan; 91(1):122-127. PubMed ID: 21895610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predicting low birth weight delivery using maternal nutritional and uterine parameters.
Krishna M; Bhatia BD; Gupta J; Satya K
Indian J Matern Child Health; 1991; 2(3):87-91. PubMed ID: 12346055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Can ultrasound on admission in active labor predict labor duration and a spontaneous delivery?
Hjartardóttir H; Lund SH; Benediktsdóttir S; Geirsson RT; Eggebø TM
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2021 Sep; 3(5):100383. PubMed ID: 33901721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Success of trial of labor in women with a history of previous cesarean section for failed labor induction or labor dystocia: a retrospective cohort study.
Place K; Kruit H; Tekay A; Heinonen S; Rahkonen L
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 May; 19(1):176. PubMed ID: 31109302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. First delivery after cesarean delivery for strictly defined cephalopelvic disproportion.
Impey L; O'Herlihy C
Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Nov; 92(5):799-803. PubMed ID: 9794672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
