BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24555077)

  • 1. Systematic assessment of benefits and risks: study protocol for a multi-criteria decision analysis using the Analytic Hierarchy Process for comparative effectiveness research.
    Maruthur NM; Joy S; Dolan J; Segal JB; Shihab HM; Singh S
    F1000Res; 2013; 2():160. PubMed ID: 24555077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Group decision making with the analytic hierarchy process in benefit-risk assessment: a tutorial.
    Hummel JM; Bridges JF; IJzerman MJ
    Patient; 2014; 7(2):129-40. PubMed ID: 24623191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Elicitation of quantitative, choice-based preferences for Person-Centered Care among People living with Dementia in comparison to physicians' judgements in Germany: study protocol for the mixed-methods PreDemCare-study.
    Mohr W; Rädke A; Michalowsky B; Hoffmann W
    BMC Geriatr; 2022 Jul; 22(1):567. PubMed ID: 35804302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An Analytical Mobile App for Shared Decision Making About Prenatal Screening: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.
    Abbasgholizadeh Rahimi S; Archambault PM; Ravitsky V; Lemoine ME; Langlois S; Forest JC; Giguère AMC; Rousseau F; Dolan JG; Légaré F
    JMIR Res Protoc; 2019 Oct; 8(10):e13321. PubMed ID: 31596249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Post-surgery length of stay using multi-criteria decision-making tool.
    Buttigieg SC; Gauci D; Bezzina F; Dey PK
    J Health Organ Manag; 2018 Jun; 32(4):514-531. PubMed ID: 29969350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Shared decision-making--transferring research into practice: the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP).
    Dolan JG
    Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Dec; 73(3):418-25. PubMed ID: 18760559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process in healthcare research: A systematic literature review and evaluation of reporting.
    Schmidt K; Aumann I; Hollander I; Damm K; von der Schulenburg JM
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2015 Dec; 15():112. PubMed ID: 26703458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sequential decision tree using the analytic hierarchy process for decision support in rectal cancer.
    Suner A; Çelikoğlu CC; Dicle O; Sökmen S
    Artif Intell Med; 2012 Sep; 56(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 22776889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multi criteria decision making to select the best method for the preparation of solid lipid nanoparticles of rasagiline mesylate using analytic hierarchy process.
    Kunasekaran V; Krishnamoorthy K
    J Adv Pharm Technol Res; 2014 Jul; 5(3):115-21. PubMed ID: 25126532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Program eases decision making.
    Turri JJ
    Health Prog; 1988 Oct; 69(8):40-4. PubMed ID: 10290384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A web-based software for group decision with analytic hierarchy process.
    Françozo RV; Junior LSVU; Carrapateira ES; Pacheco BCS; Oliveira MT; Torsoni GB; Yari J
    MethodsX; 2023 Dec; 11():102277. PubMed ID: 37519948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using an innovative criteria weighting tool for stakeholders involvement to rank MSW facility sites with the AHP.
    De Feo G; De Gisi S
    Waste Manag; 2010 Nov; 30(11):2370-82. PubMed ID: 20444589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using the analytic hierarchy process to elicit patient preferences: prioritizing multiple outcome measures of antidepressant drug treatment.
    Hummel MJ; Volz F; van Manen JG; Danner M; Dintsios CM; Ijzerman MJ; Gerber A
    Patient; 2012; 5(4):225-37. PubMed ID: 23098363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Allocating resources for cancer control--resolving multicriteria decision-making using the analytic hierarchy process].
    Gróf A
    Magy Onkol; 2007; 51(3):197-208. PubMed ID: 17922059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of the AHP methodology in system dynamics: Modelling and simulation for health technology assessments to determine the correct prosthesis choice for hernia diseases.
    Improta G; Russo MA; Triassi M; Converso G; Murino T; Santillo LC
    Math Biosci; 2018 May; 299():19-27. PubMed ID: 29518403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process for Prioritizing Imaging Tests in Diagnosis of Suspected Appendicitis.
    Agapova M; Bresnahan BW; Linnau KF; Garrison LP; Higashi M; Kessler L; Devine B
    Acad Radiol; 2017 May; 24(5):530-537. PubMed ID: 28363670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.
    Stacey D; Bennett CL; Barry MJ; Col NF; Eden KB; Holmes-Rovner M; Llewellyn-Thomas H; Lyddiatt A; Légaré F; Thomson R
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2011 Oct; (10):CD001431. PubMed ID: 21975733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Priorities in the Prevention Strategies for Medication Error Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process Method.
    Kim S; Kim H; Suh HS
    Healthcare (Basel); 2022 Mar; 10(3):. PubMed ID: 35326990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The use of multi-criteria decision making models in evaluating anesthesia method options in circumcision surgery.
    Hancerliogullari G; Hancerliogullari KO; Koksalmis E
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2017 Jan; 17(1):14. PubMed ID: 28114944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.