BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24555636)

  • 1. Repeatability of diagnostic features and scoring systems for hepatocellular carcinoma by using MR imaging.
    Davenport MS; Khalatbari S; Liu PS; Maturen KE; Kaza RK; Wasnik AP; Al-Hawary MM; Glazer DI; Stein EB; Patel J; Somashekar DK; Viglianti BL; Hussain HK
    Radiology; 2014 Jul; 272(1):132-42. PubMed ID: 24555636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Imaging features of hepatocellular carcinoma compared to intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and combined tumor on MRI using liver imaging and data system (LI-RADS) version 2014.
    Horvat N; Nikolovski I; Long N; Gerst S; Zheng J; Pak LM; Simpson A; Zheng J; Capanu M; Jarnagin WR; Mannelli L; Do RKG
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 Jan; 43(1):169-178. PubMed ID: 28765978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability, Validity, and Reader Acceptance of LI-RADS-An In-depth Analysis.
    Barth BK; Donati OF; Fischer MA; Ulbrich EJ; Karlo CA; Becker A; Seifert B; Reiner CS
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Sep; 23(9):1145-53. PubMed ID: 27174029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Concordance of hypervascular liver nodule characterization between the organ procurement and transplant network and liver imaging reporting and data system classifications.
    Bashir MR; Huang R; Mayes N; Marin D; Berg CL; Nelson RC; Jaffe TA
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Aug; 42(2):305-14. PubMed ID: 25371354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Classifying CT/MR findings in patients with suspicion of hepatocellular carcinoma: Comparison of liver imaging reporting and data system and criteria-free Likert scale reporting models.
    Zhang YD; Zhu FP; Xu X; Wang Q; Wu CJ; Liu XS; Shi HB
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Feb; 43(2):373-83. PubMed ID: 26119393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System: Discordance Between Computed Tomography and Gadoxetate-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Major Features.
    Chernyak V; Flusberg M; Law A; Kobi M; Paroder V; Rozenblit AM
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2018; 42(1):155-161. PubMed ID: 28806321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does quantitative assessment of arterial phase hyperenhancement and washout improve LI-RADS v2018-based classification of liver lesions?
    Stocker D; Becker AS; Barth BK; Skawran S; Kaniewska M; Fischer MA; Donati O; Reiner CS
    Eur Radiol; 2020 May; 30(5):2922-2933. PubMed ID: 32020398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Increased interreader agreement in diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma using an adapted LI-RADS algorithm.
    Becker AS; Barth BK; Marquez PH; Donati OF; Ulbrich EJ; Karlo C; Reiner CS; Fischer MA
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Jan; 86():33-40. PubMed ID: 28027763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interreader Reliability of LI-RADS Version 2014 Algorithm and Imaging Features for Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Large International Multireader Study.
    Fowler KJ; Tang A; Santillan C; Bhargavan-Chatfield M; Heiken J; Jha RC; Weinreb J; Hussain H; Mitchell DG; Bashir MR; Costa EAC; Cunha GM; Coombs L; Wolfson T; Gamst AC; Brancatelli G; Yeh B; Sirlin CB
    Radiology; 2018 Jan; 286(1):173-185. PubMed ID: 29091751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interobserver and intermodality agreement of standardized algorithms for non-invasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in high-risk patients: CEUS-LI-RADS versus MRI-LI-RADS.
    Schellhaas B; Hammon M; Strobel D; Pfeifer L; Kielisch C; Goertz RS; Cavallaro A; Janka R; Neurath MF; Uder M; Seuss H
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Oct; 28(10):4254-4264. PubMed ID: 29675659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The interreader agreement and validation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound liver imaging reporting and data system.
    Li J; Ling W; Chen S; Ma L; Yang L; Lu Q; Luo Y
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Nov; 120():108685. PubMed ID: 31606712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnostic Performance of LI-RADS Version 2018, LI-RADS Version 2017, and OPTN Criteria for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Kierans AS; Song C; Gavlin A; Roudenko A; Lu L; Askin G; Hecht EM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Nov; 215(5):1085-1092. PubMed ID: 32877248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnostic performance and interreader agreement of CEUS LI-RADS in ≤ 30 mm liver nodules with different experienced radiologists.
    Wen R; Lin P; Gao R; Wu Y; Peng J; Peng Y; Wen D; Yin H; Ma Z; Tang Z; He Y; Yang H
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2022 May; 47(5):1798-1805. PubMed ID: 35260943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Visualization Rates of LI-RADS Version 2014 Major Features With IV Gadobenate Dimeglumine or Gadoxetate Disodium in Patients at Risk for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Allen BC; Ho LM; Jaffe TA; Miller CM; Mazurowski MA; Bashir MR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jun; 210(6):1266-1272. PubMed ID: 29629800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Critical analysis of major and ancillary features of LI-RADS v2018 in the differentiation of small (≤ 2 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma from dysplastic nodules with gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
    De Gaetano AM; Catalano M; Pompili M; Marini MG; Rodríguez Carnero P; Gullì C; Infante A; Iezzi R; Ponziani FR; Cerrito L; Marrone G; Giuliante F; Ardito F; Rapaccini GL; Vecchio FM; Giraldi L; Manfredi R;
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2019 Sep; 23(18):7786-7801. PubMed ID: 31599447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System 2017 (LI-RADS) Criteria for Imaging Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Kierans AS; Makkar J; Guniganti P; Cornman-Homonoff J; Lee MJ; Pittman M; Askin G; Hecht EM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Jun; 49(7):e205-e215. PubMed ID: 30257054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System:: Substantial Discordance Between CT and MR for Imaging Classification of Hepatic Nodules.
    Zhang YD; Zhu FP; Xu X; Wang Q; Wu CJ; Liu XS; Shi HB
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Mar; 23(3):344-52. PubMed ID: 26777590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR findings for characterizing small (1-2-cm) hepatic nodules in patients at high risk for hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Kim TK; Lee KH; Jang HJ; Haider MA; Jacks LM; Menezes RJ; Park SH; Yazdi L; Sherman M; Khalili K
    Radiology; 2011 Jun; 259(3):730-8. PubMed ID: 21364083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2018: Impact on Categorization and Hepatocellular Carcinoma Staging.
    Chernyak V; Flusberg M; Berman J; Fruitman KC; Kobi M; Fowler KJ; Sirlin CB
    Liver Transpl; 2019 Oct; 25(10):1488-1502. PubMed ID: 31344753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rate of observation and inter-observer agreement for LI-RADS major features at CT and MRI in 184 pathology proven hepatocellular carcinomas.
    Ehman EC; Behr SC; Umetsu SE; Fidelman N; Yeh BM; Ferrell LD; Hope TA
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 May; 41(5):963-9. PubMed ID: 27193793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.