BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24556702)

  • 1. Get rich quick: the signal to respond procedure reveals the time course of semantic richness effects during visual word recognition.
    Hargreaves IS; Pexman PM
    Cognition; 2014 May; 131(2):216-42. PubMed ID: 24556702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Semantic Richness and Aging: The Effect of Number of Features in the Lexical Decision Task.
    Robert C; Rico Duarte L
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2016 Apr; 45(2):359-65. PubMed ID: 25680348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does richness lose its luster? Effects of extensive practice on semantic richness in visual word recognition.
    Hargreaves IS; Pexman PM
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2012; 6():234. PubMed ID: 22912610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Effects of the lexical-semantic variables in visual word recognition].
    Alija M; Cuetos F
    Psicothema; 2006 Aug; 18(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 17296076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An item-level analysis of lexical-semantic effects in free recall and recognition memory using the megastudy approach.
    Lau MC; Goh WD; Yap MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Oct; 71(10):2207-2222. PubMed ID: 30226433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The influence of semantic richness on the visual recognition of emotional words].
    Syssau A; Laxén J
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2012 Mar; 66(1):70-8. PubMed ID: 22390477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Semantic richness effects in lexical decision: The role of feedback.
    Yap MJ; Lim GY; Pexman PM
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Nov; 43(8):1148-67. PubMed ID: 26155967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Homophone effects in visual word recognition depend on homophone type and task demands.
    Kerswell L; Siakaluk PD; Pexman PM; Sears CR; Owen WJ
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2007 Dec; 61(4):322-7. PubMed ID: 18266508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrophysiological assessment of the time course of bilingual visual word recognition: Early access to language membership.
    Yiu LK; Pitts MA; Canseco-Gonzalez E
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():349-67. PubMed ID: 26102192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of semantic transparency and base frequency on the recognition of English complex words.
    Xu J; Taft M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 May; 41(3):904-10. PubMed ID: 25151246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An abundance of riches: cross-task comparisons of semantic richness effects in visual word recognition.
    Yap MJ; Pexman PM; Wellsby M; Hargreaves IS; Huff MJ
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2012; 6():72. PubMed ID: 22529787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Grasping the invisible: semantic processing of abstract words.
    Zdrazilova L; Pexman PM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Dec; 20(6):1312-8. PubMed ID: 23681929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rapid extraction of gist from visual text and its influence on word recognition.
    Asano M; Yokosawa K
    J Gen Psychol; 2011; 138(2):127-54. PubMed ID: 21560469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of relative embodiment in lexical and semantic processing of verbs.
    Sidhu DM; Kwan R; Pexman PM; Siakaluk PD
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jun; 149():32-9. PubMed ID: 24657828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. There are many ways to be rich: effects of three measures of semantic richness on visual word recognition.
    Pexman PM; Hargreaves IS; Siakaluk PD; Bodner GE; Pope J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Feb; 15(1):161-7. PubMed ID: 18605497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Semantic context and visual feature effects in object naming: an fMRI study using arterial spin labeling.
    Hocking J; McMahon KL; de Zubicaray GI
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1571-83. PubMed ID: 18823254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dissociative contributions of semantic and lexical-phonological information to immediate recognition.
    Nishiyama R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Mar; 39(2):642-8. PubMed ID: 22774851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Norms for name agreement, familiarity, subjective frequency, and imageability for 348 object names in Tunisian Arabic.
    Boukadi M; Zouaidi C; Wilson MA
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Jun; 48(2):585-99. PubMed ID: 26019005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An ERP study of category priming: evidence of early lexical semantic access.
    Segalowitz SJ; Zheng X
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Jan; 80(1):122-9. PubMed ID: 18524454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surviving blind decomposition: A distributional analysis of the time-course of complex word recognition.
    Schmidtke D; Matsuki K; Kuperman V
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Nov; 43(11):1793-1820. PubMed ID: 28447810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.