These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24556702)

  • 1. Get rich quick: the signal to respond procedure reveals the time course of semantic richness effects during visual word recognition.
    Hargreaves IS; Pexman PM
    Cognition; 2014 May; 131(2):216-42. PubMed ID: 24556702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Semantic Richness and Aging: The Effect of Number of Features in the Lexical Decision Task.
    Robert C; Rico Duarte L
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2016 Apr; 45(2):359-65. PubMed ID: 25680348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does richness lose its luster? Effects of extensive practice on semantic richness in visual word recognition.
    Hargreaves IS; Pexman PM
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2012; 6():234. PubMed ID: 22912610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Effects of the lexical-semantic variables in visual word recognition].
    Alija M; Cuetos F
    Psicothema; 2006 Aug; 18(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 17296076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An item-level analysis of lexical-semantic effects in free recall and recognition memory using the megastudy approach.
    Lau MC; Goh WD; Yap MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Oct; 71(10):2207-2222. PubMed ID: 30226433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The influence of semantic richness on the visual recognition of emotional words].
    Syssau A; Laxén J
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2012 Mar; 66(1):70-8. PubMed ID: 22390477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Semantic richness effects in lexical decision: The role of feedback.
    Yap MJ; Lim GY; Pexman PM
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Nov; 43(8):1148-67. PubMed ID: 26155967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Homophone effects in visual word recognition depend on homophone type and task demands.
    Kerswell L; Siakaluk PD; Pexman PM; Sears CR; Owen WJ
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2007 Dec; 61(4):322-7. PubMed ID: 18266508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrophysiological assessment of the time course of bilingual visual word recognition: Early access to language membership.
    Yiu LK; Pitts MA; Canseco-Gonzalez E
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():349-67. PubMed ID: 26102192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of semantic transparency and base frequency on the recognition of English complex words.
    Xu J; Taft M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 May; 41(3):904-10. PubMed ID: 25151246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An abundance of riches: cross-task comparisons of semantic richness effects in visual word recognition.
    Yap MJ; Pexman PM; Wellsby M; Hargreaves IS; Huff MJ
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2012; 6():72. PubMed ID: 22529787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Grasping the invisible: semantic processing of abstract words.
    Zdrazilova L; Pexman PM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Dec; 20(6):1312-8. PubMed ID: 23681929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rapid extraction of gist from visual text and its influence on word recognition.
    Asano M; Yokosawa K
    J Gen Psychol; 2011; 138(2):127-54. PubMed ID: 21560469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of relative embodiment in lexical and semantic processing of verbs.
    Sidhu DM; Kwan R; Pexman PM; Siakaluk PD
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jun; 149():32-9. PubMed ID: 24657828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. There are many ways to be rich: effects of three measures of semantic richness on visual word recognition.
    Pexman PM; Hargreaves IS; Siakaluk PD; Bodner GE; Pope J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Feb; 15(1):161-7. PubMed ID: 18605497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Semantic context and visual feature effects in object naming: an fMRI study using arterial spin labeling.
    Hocking J; McMahon KL; de Zubicaray GI
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1571-83. PubMed ID: 18823254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dissociative contributions of semantic and lexical-phonological information to immediate recognition.
    Nishiyama R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Mar; 39(2):642-8. PubMed ID: 22774851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Norms for name agreement, familiarity, subjective frequency, and imageability for 348 object names in Tunisian Arabic.
    Boukadi M; Zouaidi C; Wilson MA
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Jun; 48(2):585-99. PubMed ID: 26019005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An ERP study of category priming: evidence of early lexical semantic access.
    Segalowitz SJ; Zheng X
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Jan; 80(1):122-9. PubMed ID: 18524454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surviving blind decomposition: A distributional analysis of the time-course of complex word recognition.
    Schmidtke D; Matsuki K; Kuperman V
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Nov; 43(11):1793-1820. PubMed ID: 28447810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.