These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24557704)

  • 21. Radiation dose reduction via sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction and automatic tube voltage modulation (CARE kV) in abdominal CT.
    Shin HJ; Chung YE; Lee YH; Choi JY; Park MS; Kim MJ; Kim KW
    Korean J Radiol; 2013; 14(6):886-93. PubMed ID: 24265563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Acute intracranial hemorrhage in CT: benefits of sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction techniques.
    Bodelle B; Klein E; Naguib NN; Bauer RW; Kerl JM; Al-Butmeh F; Wichmann JL; Ackermann H; Lehnert T; Vogl TJ; Schulz B
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2014 Mar; 35(3):445-9. PubMed ID: 24263695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Can sinogram-affirmed iterative (SAFIRE) reconstruction improve imaging quality on low-dose lung CT screening compared with traditional filtered back projection (FBP) reconstruction?
    Yang WJ; Yan FH; Liu B; Pang LF; Hou L; Zhang H; Pan ZL; Chen KM
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(2):301-5. PubMed ID: 23493224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. CT coronary angiography: image quality with sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction compared with filtered back-projection.
    Wang R; Schoepf UJ; Wu R; Gibbs KP; Yu W; Li M; Zhang Z
    Clin Radiol; 2013 Mar; 68(3):272-8. PubMed ID: 22981731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reduced-dose low-voltage chest CT angiography with Sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction versus standard-dose filtered back projection.
    Pontana F; Pagniez J; Duhamel A; Flohr T; Faivre JB; Murphy C; Remy J; Remy-Jardin M
    Radiology; 2013 May; 267(2):609-18. PubMed ID: 23297336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Computed tomography of the cervical spine: comparison of image quality between a standard-dose and a low-dose protocol using filtered back-projection and iterative reconstruction.
    Becce F; Ben Salah Y; Verdun FR; Vande Berg BC; Lecouvet FE; Meuli R; Omoumi P
    Skeletal Radiol; 2013 Jul; 42(7):937-45. PubMed ID: 23359034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Attenuation-based automatic kilovoltage selection and sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction: effects on radiation exposure and image quality of portal-phase liver CT.
    Song JS; Choi EJ; Kim EY; Kwak HS; Han YM
    Korean J Radiol; 2015; 16(1):69-79. PubMed ID: 25598675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of iterative model, hybrid iterative, and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques in low-dose brain CT: impact of thin-slice imaging.
    Nakaura T; Iyama Y; Kidoh M; Yokoyama K; Oda S; Tokuyasu S; Harada K; Yamashita Y
    Neuroradiology; 2016 Mar; 58(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 26715558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Low-dose CT for patients with clinically suspected acute appendicitis: optimal strength of sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction for image quality and diagnostic performance.
    Kim SH; Yoon JH; Lee JH; Lim YJ; Kim OH; Ryu JH; Son JH
    Acta Radiol; 2015 Aug; 56(8):899-907. PubMed ID: 25118330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Image quality assessment of standard- and low-dose chest CT using filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and novel model-based iterative reconstruction algorithms.
    Vardhanabhuti V; Loader RJ; Mitchell GR; Riordan RD; Roobottom CA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Mar; 200(3):545-52. PubMed ID: 23436843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Full Dose-Reduction Potential of Statistical Iterative Reconstruction for Head CT Protocols in a Predominantly Pediatric Population.
    Mirro AE; Brady SL; Kaufman RA
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2016 Jul; 37(7):1199-205. PubMed ID: 27056425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Performance of iterative reconstruction and automated tube voltage selection on the image quality and radiation dose in abdominal CT scans.
    Desai GS; Fuentes Orrego JM; Kambadakone AR; Sahani DV
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(6):897-903. PubMed ID: 24270111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Extent of tube-current reduction using sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction in pediatric computed tomography: phantom study.
    Brindhaban A
    Pediatr Radiol; 2019 Jan; 49(1):51-56. PubMed ID: 30259068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Detection of urolithiasis: comparison of 100% tube exposure images reconstructed with filtered back projection and 50% tube exposure images reconstructed with sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction.
    Remer EM; Herts BR; Primak A; Obuchowski NA; Greiwe A; Roesel DM; Purysko AS; Feldman MK; De S; Shah SN; Dong F; Monga M; Baker ME
    Radiology; 2014 Sep; 272(3):749-56. PubMed ID: 24814177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reducing the radiation dose for low-dose CT of the paranasal sinuses using iterative reconstruction: feasibility and image quality.
    Bulla S; Blanke P; Hassepass F; Krauss T; Winterer JT; Breunig C; Langer M; Pache G
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81(9):2246-50. PubMed ID: 21664084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Lowering radiation dose during dedicated colorectal cancer MDCT: comparison of low tube voltage and sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction at 80 kVp versus blended dual-energy images in a population of patients with low body mass index.
    Chen CY; Hsu JS; Jaw TS; Kuo YT; Wu DC; Lee CH; Shih MC; Tsai TH; Kuo CH; Chen YT; Yang LH; Liu GC
    Abdom Imaging; 2015 Oct; 40(7):2867-76. PubMed ID: 25860034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Diagnostic accuracy of coronary CT angiography: comparison of filtered back projection and iterative reconstruction with different strengths.
    Wang R; Schoepf UJ; Wu R; Nance JW; Lv B; Yang H; Li F; Lu D; Zhang Z
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2014; 38(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 24625599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. CT Dose Reduction for Visceral Adipose Tissue Measurement: Effects of Model-Based and Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstructions and Filtered Back Projection.
    Yamada Y; Jinzaki M; Niijima Y; Hashimoto M; Yamada M; Abe T; Kuribayashi S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jun; 204(6):W677-83. PubMed ID: 26001256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Performance of iterative image reconstruction in CT of the paranasal sinuses: a phantom study.
    Schulz B; Beeres M; Bodelle B; Bauer R; Al-Butmeh F; Thalhammer A; Vogl TJ; Kerl JM
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2013 May; 34(5):1072-6. PubMed ID: 23221946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Benefits of sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction in 0.4 mSv ultra-low-dose CT of the upper abdomen following transarterial chemoembolisation: comparison to low-dose and standard-dose CT and filtered back projection technique.
    Bodelle B; Isler S; Scholtz JE; Frellesen C; Luboldt W; Vogl TJ; Beeres M
    Clin Radiol; 2016 Jan; 71(1):e11-5. PubMed ID: 26521185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.