BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

639 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24558117)

  • 1. Assessing single nucleotide variant detection and genotype calling on whole-genome sequenced individuals.
    Cheng AY; Teo YY; Ong RT
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Jun; 30(12):1707-13. PubMed ID: 24558117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using genotype array data to compare multi- and single-sample variant calls and improve variant call sets from deep coverage whole-genome sequencing data.
    Shringarpure SS; Mathias RA; Hernandez RD; O'Connor TD; Szpiech ZA; Torres R; De La Vega FM; Bustamante CD; Barnes KC; Taub MA;
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Apr; 33(8):1147-1153. PubMed ID: 28035032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison among three variant callers and assessment of the accuracy of imputation from SNP array data to whole-genome sequence level in chicken.
    Ni G; Strom TM; Pausch H; Reimer C; Preisinger R; Simianer H; Erbe M
    BMC Genomics; 2015 Oct; 16():824. PubMed ID: 26486989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of whole-genome (13X) and capture (87X) resequencing methods for SNP and genotype callings.
    Roux PF; Marthey S; Djari A; Moroldo M; Esquerré D; Estellé J; Klopp C; Lagarrigue S; Demeure O
    Anim Genet; 2015 Feb; 46(1):82-6. PubMed ID: 25515399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Calling known variants and identifying new variants while rapidly aligning sequence data.
    VanRaden PM; Bickhart DM; O'Connell JR
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Apr; 102(4):3216-3229. PubMed ID: 30772032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Variant callers for next-generation sequencing data: a comparison study.
    Liu X; Han S; Wang Z; Gelernter J; Yang BZ
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e75619. PubMed ID: 24086590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. iCall: a genotype-calling algorithm for rare, low-frequency and common variants on the Illumina exome array.
    Zhou J; Tantoso E; Wong LP; Ong RT; Bei JX; Li Y; Liu J; Khor CC; Teo YY
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Jun; 30(12):1714-20. PubMed ID: 24567545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Variant calling in low-coverage whole genome sequencing of a Native American population sample.
    Bizon C; Spiegel M; Chasse SA; Gizer IR; Li Y; Malc EP; Mieczkowski PA; Sailsbery JK; Wang X; Ehlers CL; Wilhelmsen KC
    BMC Genomics; 2014 Jan; 15():85. PubMed ID: 24479562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of post-alignment processing in variant discovery from whole exome data.
    Tian S; Yan H; Kalmbach M; Slager SL
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Oct; 17(1):403. PubMed ID: 27716037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of SNP calling using single and multiple-sample calling algorithms by validation against array base genotyping and Mendelian inheritance.
    Kumar P; Al-Shafai M; Al Muftah WA; Chalhoub N; Elsaid MF; Aleem AA; Suhre K
    BMC Res Notes; 2014 Oct; 7():747. PubMed ID: 25339461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Archived neonatal dried blood spot samples can be used for accurate whole genome and exome-targeted next-generation sequencing.
    Hollegaard MV; Grauholm J; Nielsen R; Grove J; Mandrup S; Hougaard DM
    Mol Genet Metab; 2013; 110(1-2):65-72. PubMed ID: 23830478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Whole-genome characterization in pedigreed non-human primates using genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) and imputation.
    Bimber BN; Raboin MJ; Letaw J; Nevonen KA; Spindel JE; McCouch SR; Cervera-Juanes R; Spindel E; Carbone L; Ferguson B; Vinson A
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Aug; 17(1):676. PubMed ID: 27558348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accurate sequence variant genotyping in cattle using variation-aware genome graphs.
    Crysnanto D; Wurmser C; Pausch H
    Genet Sel Evol; 2019 May; 51(1):21. PubMed ID: 31092189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genome-Wide SNP Calling from Genotyping by Sequencing (GBS) Data: A Comparison of Seven Pipelines and Two Sequencing Technologies.
    Torkamaneh D; Laroche J; Belzile F
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0161333. PubMed ID: 27547936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of genotyping-by-sequencing analysis methods on low-coverage crop datasets shows advantages of a new workflow, GB-eaSy.
    Wickland DP; Battu G; Hudson KA; Diers BW; Hudson ME
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Dec; 18(1):586. PubMed ID: 29281959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Low-depth genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) in a bovine population: strategies to maximize the selection of high quality genotypes and the accuracy of imputation.
    Brouard JS; Boyle B; Ibeagha-Awemu EM; Bissonnette N
    BMC Genet; 2017 Apr; 18(1):32. PubMed ID: 28381212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Steps to ensure accuracy in genotype and SNP calling from Illumina sequencing data.
    Liu Q; Guo Y; Li J; Long J; Zhang B; Shyr Y
    BMC Genomics; 2012; 13 Suppl 8(Suppl 8):S8. PubMed ID: 23281772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing variant calling algorithms for target-exon sequencing in a large sample.
    Lo Y; Kang HM; Nelson MR; Othman MI; Chissoe SL; Ehm MG; Abecasis GR; Zöllner S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Mar; 16():75. PubMed ID: 25884587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of variant calling tools for large plant genome re-sequencing.
    Yao Z; You FM; N'Diaye A; Knox RE; McCartney C; Hiebert CW; Pozniak C; Xu W
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Aug; 21(1):360. PubMed ID: 32807073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A strategy to improve phasing of whole-genome sequenced individuals through integration of familial information from dense genotype panels.
    Faux P; Druet T
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 May; 49(1):46. PubMed ID: 28511677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.