315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24559525)
1. The effect of various interim fixed prosthodontic materials on the polymerization of elastomeric impression materials.
Al-Sowygh ZH
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):176-81. PubMed ID: 24559525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Marginal fidelity of crowns fabricated from six proprietary provisional materials.
Tjan AH; Castelnuovo J; Shiotsu G
J Prosthet Dent; 1997 May; 77(5):482-5. PubMed ID: 9151267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of matrix type on surface roughness of three resins for provisional crowns and fixed partial dentures.
Ayuso-Montero R; Martinez-Gomis J; Lujan-Climent M; Salsench J; Peraire M
J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):141-4. PubMed ID: 19054307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mechanical properties of urethane and bis-acryl interim resin materials.
Kerby RE; Knobloch LA; Sharples S; Peregrina A
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Jul; 110(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 23849610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bacterial adhesion of Streptococcus mutans to provisional fixed prosthodontic material.
Buergers R; Rosentritt M; Handel G
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Dec; 98(6):461-9. PubMed ID: 18061740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pre- and post-set hydrophilicity of elastomeric impression materials.
Michalakis KX; Bakopoulou A; Hirayama H; Garefis DP; Garefis PD
J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):238-48. PubMed ID: 17559537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of a new ring-opening metathesis elastomeric dental impression material with spray and immersion disinfection.
Kronström MH; Johnson GH; Hompesch RW
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 20105678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of various base/core materials on the setting of a polyvinyl siloxane impression material.
Moon MG; Jarrett TA; Morlen RA; Fallo GJ
J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Dec; 76(6):608-12. PubMed ID: 8957786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A novel technique for the direct fabrication of fixed interim restorations.
Konstantinidis I; Kotsakis G; Pallis K; Walter MH
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Mar; 109(3):198-201. PubMed ID: 23522370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of polyvinyl siloxane impression material on the polymerization of composite resin.
Chen L; Kleverlaan CJ; Liang K; Yang D
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Apr; 117(4):552-558. PubMed ID: 27765393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contact angle of unset elastomeric impression materials.
Menees TS; Radhakrishnan R; Ramp LC; Burgess JO; Lawson NC
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Oct; 114(4):536-42. PubMed ID: 26187106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The dynamic interaction of water with four dental impression materials during cure.
Hosseinpour D; Berg JC
J Prosthodont; 2009 Jun; 18(4):292-300. PubMed ID: 19210607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of contemporary retraction agents and cleaning with hydrogen peroxide on the polymerization of elastomeric impression materials.
Vohra F; Altokhais F; Thafrah AB; Alsaif K; Alyahya A; Alsahhaf A; AlFawaz YF; Aali KA; Abduljabbar T; Aldeeb M
J Appl Biomater Funct Mater; 2020; 18():2280800019891072. PubMed ID: 31986959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of surface moisture on detail reproduction of elastomeric impressions.
Johnson GH; Lepe X; Aw TC
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Oct; 90(4):354-64. PubMed ID: 14564290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Surface roughness of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials following chemical disinfection, autoclave and microwave sterilization.
Al Kheraif AA
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 May; 14(3):483-7. PubMed ID: 24171994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of relative humidity on the hydrophilicity of unset elastomeric impression materials.
Rupp F; Axmann D; Geis-Gerstorfer J
Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(1):69-71. PubMed ID: 18350951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hydrophilicity of unset and set elastomeric impression materials.
Rupp F; Geis-Gerstorfer J
Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(6):552-4. PubMed ID: 21209992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the precision of three implant transfer impression techniques using two elastomeric impression materials.
Mostafa TM; Elgendy MN; Kashef NA; Halim MM
Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(6):525-8. PubMed ID: 21209987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contribution of postpolymerization conditioning and storage environments to the mechanical properties of three interim restorative materials.
Thompson GA; Luo Q
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):638-48. PubMed ID: 24831742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative study of interim materials for direct fixed dental prostheses and their fabrication with CAD/CAM technique.
Peñate L; Basilio J; Roig M; Mercadé M
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):248-53. PubMed ID: 25935084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
