165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24560287)
1. A comparison of two methods for estimating DCE-MRI parameters via individual and cohort based AIFs in prostate cancer: a step towards practical implementation.
Fedorov A; Fluckiger J; Ayers GD; Li X; Gupta SN; Tempany C; Mulkern R; Yankeelov TE; Fennessy FM
Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 May; 32(4):321-9. PubMed ID: 24560287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative pharmacokinetic analysis of prostate cancer DCE-MRI at 3T: comparison of two arterial input functions on cancer detection with digitized whole mount histopathological validation.
Fennessy FM; Fedorov A; Penzkofer T; Kim KW; Hirsch MS; Vangel MG; Masry P; Flood TA; Chang MC; Tempany CM; Mulkern RV; Gupta SN
Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Sep; 33(7):886-94. PubMed ID: 25683515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of repeatability and treatment response in early phase clinical trials using DCE-MRI: comparison of parametric analysis using MR- and CT-derived arterial input functions.
Rata M; Collins DJ; Darcy J; Messiou C; Tunariu N; Desouza N; Young H; Leach MO; Orton MR
Eur Radiol; 2016 Jul; 26(7):1991-8. PubMed ID: 26385804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Demonstration of the reproducibility of free-breathing diffusion-weighted MRI and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in children with solid tumours: a pilot study.
Miyazaki K; Jerome NP; Collins DJ; Orton MR; d'Arcy JA; Wallace T; Moreno L; Pearson AD; Marshall LV; Carceller F; Leach MO; Zacharoulis S; Koh DM
Eur Radiol; 2015 Sep; 25(9):2641-50. PubMed ID: 25773937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improved reliability of perfusion estimation in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI by using the arterial input function from dynamic contrast enhanced MRI.
Tseng CH; Jaspers J; Romero AM; Wielopolski P; Smits M; van Osch MJP; Vos F
NMR Biomed; 2024 Jan; 37(1):e5038. PubMed ID: 37712359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of dual-echo DSC-MRI- and DCE-MRI-derived contrast agent kinetic parameters.
Quarles CC; Gore JC; Xu L; Yankeelov TE
Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Sep; 30(7):944-53. PubMed ID: 22617148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Direct parametric reconstruction from undersampled (k, t)-space data in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI.
Dikaios N; Arridge S; Hamy V; Punwani S; Atkinson D
Med Image Anal; 2014 Oct; 18(7):989-1001. PubMed ID: 24972377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Arterial input functions in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: which model performs best when assessing breast cancer response?
Woolf DK; Taylor NJ; Makris A; Tunariu N; Collins DJ; Li SP; Ah-See ML; Beresford M; Padhani AR
Br J Radiol; 2016 Jul; 89(1063):20150961. PubMed ID: 27187599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in head and neck cancer: A systematic comparison of different modelling approaches.
Kåstad Høiskar M; Sæther O; Delange Alsaker M; Røe Redalen K; Winter RM
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2024 Jan; 29():100548. PubMed ID: 38380153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of an automated method for arterial input function detection for first-pass myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
Jacobs M; Benovoy M; Chang LC; Arai AE; Hsu LY
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2016 Apr; 18():17. PubMed ID: 27055445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Greybox: A hybrid algorithm for direct estimation of tracer kinetic parameters from undersampled DCE-MRI data.
Rastogi A; Yalavarthy PK
Med Phys; 2024 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 38214325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tumour subregion analysis of colorectal liver metastases using semi-automated clustering based on DCE-MRI: Comparison with histological subregions and impact on pharmacokinetic parameter analysis.
Franklin JM; Irving B; Papiez BW; Kallehauge JF; Wang LM; Goldin RD; Harris AL; Anderson EM; Schnabel JA; Chappell MA; Brady M; Sharma RA; Gleeson FV
Eur J Radiol; 2020 May; 126():108934. PubMed ID: 32217426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of temporal resolution in determining pharmacokinetic parameters from DCE-MRI data.
Heisen M; Fan X; Buurman J; van Riel NA; Karczmar GS; ter Haar Romeny BM
Magn Reson Med; 2010 Mar; 63(3):811-6. PubMed ID: 20187187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI estimation of vascular parameters using knowledge-based adaptive models.
Bagher-Ebadian H; Brown SL; Ghassemi MM; Nagaraja TN; Valadie OG; Acharya PC; Cabral G; Divine G; Knight RA; Lee IY; Xu JH; Movsas B; Chetty IJ; Ewing JR
Sci Rep; 2023 Jun; 13(1):9672. PubMed ID: 37316579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Unpaired deep learning for pharmacokinetic parameter estimation from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI without AIF measurements.
Oh G; Moon Y; Moon WJ; Ye JC
Neuroimage; 2024 May; 291():120571. PubMed ID: 38518829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and MR diffusion imaging to distinguish between glandular and stromal prostatic tissues.
Noworolski SM; Vigneron DB; Chen AP; Kurhanewicz J
Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Oct; 26(8):1071-80. PubMed ID: 18508221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of Bayesian and non-linear regression methods for robust estimation of pharmacokinetics in DCE-MRI and how it affects cancer diagnosis.
Dikaios N; Atkinson D; Tudisca C; Purpura P; Forster M; Ahmed H; Beale T; Emberton M; Punwani S
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2017 Mar; 56():1-10. PubMed ID: 28192761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The use of error-category mapping in pharmacokinetic model analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data.
Gill AB; Anandappa G; Patterson AJ; Priest AN; Graves MJ; Janowitz T; Jodrell DI; Eisen T; Lomas DJ
Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Feb; 33(2):246-51. PubMed ID: 25460333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Enhancement-constrained acceleration: A robust reconstruction framework in breast DCE-MRI.
Easley TO; Ren Z; Kim B; Karczmar GS; Barber RF; Pineda FD
PLoS One; 2021; 16(10):e0258621. PubMed ID: 34710110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sensitivity analysis of an image-based solid tumor computational model with heterogeneous vasculature and porosity.
Pishko GL; Astary GW; Mareci TH; Sarntinoranont M
Ann Biomed Eng; 2011 Sep; 39(9):2360-73. PubMed ID: 21751070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
