These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24560785)

  • 21. Binaural prediction of speech intelligibility in reverberant rooms with multiple noise sources.
    Lavandier M; Jelfs S; Culling JF; Watkins AJ; Raimond AP; Makin SJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):218-31. PubMed ID: 22280586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Relationship between listening difficulty rating and objective measures in reverberant and noisy sound fields for young adults and elderly persons.
    Sato H; Morimoto M; Wada M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jun; 131(6):4596-605. PubMed ID: 22712933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Spectral contrast enhancement of speech in noise for listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment: effects on intelligibility, quality, and response times.
    Baer T; Moore BC; Gatehouse S
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):49-72. PubMed ID: 8263829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reliability, sensitivity and validity of magnitude estimation, category scaling and paired-comparison judgements of speech intelligibility by older listeners.
    Purdy SC; Pavlovic CV
    Audiology; 1992; 31(5):254-71. PubMed ID: 1482505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The influence of spectral characteristics of early reflections on speech intelligibility.
    Arweiler I; Buchholz JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Aug; 130(2):996-1005. PubMed ID: 21877812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Combined effects of noise and reverberation on speech recognition performance of normal-hearing children and adults.
    Neuman AC; Wroblewski M; Hajicek J; Rubinstein A
    Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):336-44. PubMed ID: 20215967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The combined effects of reverberation and nonstationary noise on sentence intelligibility.
    George EL; Festen JM; Houtgast T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):1269-77. PubMed ID: 18681613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effect of simulated room acoustic parameters on the intelligibility and perceived reverberation of monosyllabic words and sentences.
    Fogerty D; Alghamdi A; Chan WY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 May; 147(5):EL396. PubMed ID: 32486791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of sound processing strategies for osseointegrated bone conduction implants in mixed hearing loss: multiple-channel nonlinear versus single-channel linear processing.
    Desmet JB; Bosman AJ; Snik AF; Lambrechts P; Hol MK; Mylanus EA; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Jun; 34(4):598-603. PubMed ID: 23615167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Measuring the effects of reverberation and noise on sentence intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners.
    George EL; Goverts ST; Festen JM; Houtgast T
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Dec; 53(6):1429-39. PubMed ID: 20689027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing.
    Jørgensen S; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1475-87. PubMed ID: 21895088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Speech segregation in rooms: effects of reverberation on both target and interferer.
    Lavandier M; Culling JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1713. PubMed ID: 17927431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Measurement of acoustic characteristics of Japanese Buddhist temples in relation to sound source location and direction.
    Soeta Y; Shimokura R; Kim YH; Ohsawa T; Ito K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):2699-710. PubMed ID: 23654378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm.
    Fink N; Furst M; Muchnik C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1718-31. PubMed ID: 22978899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Relationship between speech recognition in noise and sparseness.
    Li G; Lutman ME; Wang S; Bleeck S
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Feb; 51(2):75-82. PubMed ID: 22107445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of noise, nonlinear processing, and linear filtering on perceived speech quality.
    Arehart KH; Kates JM; Anderson MC
    Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):420-36. PubMed ID: 20440116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cortical Characterization of Reverberation Time in Reverberant Speech.
    Luo C; Pan C; Zheng D; Chen F
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2020 Jul; 2020():3314-3317. PubMed ID: 33018713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of spectral change enhancement for the hearing impaired using parameter values selected with a genetic algorithm.
    Chen J; Baer T; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):2910-20. PubMed ID: 23654396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cross-channel amplitude sweeps are crucial to speech intelligibility.
    Prendergast G; Green GG
    Brain Lang; 2012 Mar; 120(3):406-11. PubMed ID: 22137845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.