1174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24560995)
1. Wavefront-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis for patients with myopia: a prospective randomized contralateral eye study.
He L; Liu A; Manche EE
Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jun; 157(6):1170-1178.e1. PubMed ID: 24560995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of 2 wavefront-guided excimer lasers for myopic laser in situ keratomileusis: one-year results.
Yu CQ; Manche EE
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Mar; 40(3):412-22. PubMed ID: 24581773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contralateral eye-to-eye comparison of wavefront-guided and wavefront-optimized photorefractive keratectomy: a randomized clinical trial.
He L; Manche EE
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Jan; 133(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 25321951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Wavefront-optimized ablation versus topography-guided customized ablation in myopic LASIK: comparative study of higher order aberrations.
El Awady HE; Ghanem AA; Saleh SM
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2011; 42(4):314-20. PubMed ID: 21534496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. One-year outcomes from a prospective, randomized, eye-to-eye comparison of wavefront-guided and wavefront-optimized LASIK in myopes.
Sáles CS; Manche EE
Ophthalmology; 2013 Dec; 120(12):2396-2402. PubMed ID: 23778091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of 2 femtosecond lasers for flap creation in myopic laser in situ keratomileusis: one-year results.
Yu CQ; Manche EE
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Apr; 41(4):740-8. PubMed ID: 25840298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Visual outcomes after wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: Prospective comparison.
Moshirfar M; Schliesser JA; Chang JC; Oberg TJ; Mifflin MD; Townley R; Livingston MK; Kurz CJ
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1336-43. PubMed ID: 20656157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the visual results after SMILE and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for myopia.
Lin F; Xu Y; Yang Y
J Refract Surg; 2014 Apr; 30(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 24702576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical Outcomes After SMILE and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK for Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study.
Liu M; Chen Y; Wang D; Zhou Y; Zhang X; He J; Zhang T; Sun Y; Liu Q
Cornea; 2016 Feb; 35(2):210-6. PubMed ID: 26684046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative evaluation of higher-order aberrations and corneal asphericity between wavefront-guided and aspheric LASIK for myopia.
Goyal JL; Garg A; Arora R; Jain P; Goel Y
J Refract Surg; 2014 Nov; 30(11):777-84. PubMed ID: 25375851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Four-year visual, refractive, and contrast sensitivity outcomes after wavefront-guided myopic LASIK using an advanced excimer laser platform.
Shaheen MS; Massoud TH; Ezzeldin H; Khalifa MA
J Refract Surg; 2013 Dec; 29(12):816-22. PubMed ID: 24168789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Randomized Comparative Study of Topography-Guided Versus Wavefront-Optimized FS-LASIK for Correcting Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism.
Zhang Y; Chen Y
J Refract Surg; 2019 Sep; 35(9):575-582. PubMed ID: 31498415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical keratome flaps in wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: prospective contralateral eye study.
Durrie DS; Kezirian GM
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jan; 31(1):120-6. PubMed ID: 15721704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Randomized prospective clinical study comparing induced aberrations with IntraLase and Hansatome flap creation in fellow eyes: potential impact on wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis.
Tran DB; Sarayba MA; Bor Z; Garufis C; Duh YJ; Soltes CR; Juhasz T; Kurtz RM
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jan; 31(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 15721701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Wavefront-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis: contralateral comparative study.
Padmanabhan P; Mrochen M; Basuthkar S; Viswanathan D; Joseph R
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Mar; 34(3):389-97. PubMed ID: 18299062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Wavefront-guided versus wavefront-optimized photorefractive keratectomy: Clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction.
Sia RK; Ryan DS; Stutzman RD; Pasternak JF; Eaddy JB; Logan LA; Torres MF; Bower KS
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Oct; 41(10):2152-64. PubMed ID: 26703291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Wavefront-optimized excimer laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and myopic astigmatism: refractive outcomes and corneal densitometry.
Fares U; Otri AM; Al-Aqaba MA; Faraj L; Dua HS
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Dec; 38(12):2131-8. PubMed ID: 23084157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Safety, efficacy, and predictability of laser in situ keratomileusis to correct myopia or myopic astigmatism with a 750 Hz scanning-spot laser system.
Tomita M; Watabe M; Yukawa S; Nakamura N; Nakamura T; Magnago T
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Feb; 40(2):251-8. PubMed ID: 24345530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Wavefront-guided vs wavefront-optimized LASIK: a randomized clinical trial comparing contralateral eyes.
Miraftab M; Seyedian MA; Hashemi H
J Refract Surg; 2011 Apr; 27(4):245-50. PubMed ID: 20839665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Induced Higher-order aberrations after Laser In Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) Performed with Wavefront-Guided IntraLase Femtosecond Laser in moderate to high Astigmatism.
Al-Zeraid FM; Osuagwu UL
BMC Ophthalmol; 2016 Mar; 16():29. PubMed ID: 27000109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
