These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24561292)

  • 21. Drift-reducing nozzles and their biological efficacy.
    Nuyttens D; Dhoop M; De Blauwer V; Hermann O; Hubrechts W; Mestdagh I; Dekeyser D
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2009; 74(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 20218510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Pesticide dispersion by spraying under tropical conditions.
    Langenbach T; Mano D; Campos MM; Cunha ALMC; De Campos TMP
    J Environ Sci Health B; 2017 Dec; 52(12):843-849. PubMed ID: 28949807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Low-drift nozzles vs. standard nozzles for pesticide application in the biological efficacy trials of pesticides in apple pest and disease control.
    Doruchowski G; Świechowski W; Masny S; Maciesiak A; Tartanus M; Bryk H; Hołownicki R
    Sci Total Environ; 2017 Jan; 575():1239-1246. PubMed ID: 27720255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Drift from the Use of Hand-Held Knapsack Pesticide Sprayers in Boyacá (Colombian Andes).
    García-Santos G; Feola G; Nuyttens D; Diaz J
    J Agric Food Chem; 2016 May; 64(20):3990-8. PubMed ID: 26479088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Decision support tools for environmentally safe use of pesticides.
    Doruchowski G; Balsari P; Marucco P; Herbst A; Wehmann HJ; Roettele M; Gil E; Codis S; Pauwelyn E
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2013; 78(2):37-45. PubMed ID: 25145224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Environmental attitudes and drift reduction behavior among commercial pesticide applicators in a U.S. agricultural landscape.
    Reimer AP; Prokopy LS
    J Environ Manage; 2012 Dec; 113():361-9. PubMed ID: 23062271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Spray Drift from Three Airblast Sprayer Technologies in a Modern Orchard Work Environment.
    Kasner EJ; Fenske RA; Hoheisel GA; Galvin K; Blanco MN; Seto EYW; Yost MG
    Ann Work Expo Health; 2020 Jan; 64(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 31786605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Spray pesticide applications in Mediterranean citrus orchards: Canopy deposition and off-target losses.
    Garcerá C; Moltó E; Chueca P
    Sci Total Environ; 2017 Dec; 599-600():1344-1362. PubMed ID: 28525940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A pdpa laser-based measuring set-up for the characterisation of spray nozzles.
    Nuyttens D; Sonck B; de Schampheleire M; Steurbaut W; Baetens K; Verboven P; Nicolaï B; Ramon H
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2005; 70(4):1023-35. PubMed ID: 16628951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Environmentally Optimised Sprayer (EOS)--A software application for comprehensive assessment of environmental safety features of sprayers.
    Doruchowski G; Balsari P; Gil E; Marucco P; Roettele M; Wehmann HJ
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Jun; 482-483():201-7. PubMed ID: 24651055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Hooded broadcast sprayer for particle drift reduction.
    Canella Vieira B; Coura Oliveira M; Sousa Alves G; Golus JA; Schroeder K; Smeda RJ; Rector RJ; Kruger GR; Werle R
    Pest Manag Sci; 2022 Apr; 78(4):1519-1528. PubMed ID: 34964248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Windbreaks as a pesticide drift mitigation strategy: a review.
    Ucar T; Hall FR
    Pest Manag Sci; 2001 Aug; 57(8):663-75. PubMed ID: 11517719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Potential dermal exposure to operators applying pesticide on greenhouse crops using low-cost equipment.
    Rincón VJ; Páez FC; Sánchez-Hermosilla J
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Jul; 630():1181-1187. PubMed ID: 29554739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of collectors of airborne spray drift. Experiments in a wind tunnel and field measurements.
    Arvidsson T; Bergström L; Kreuger J
    Pest Manag Sci; 2011 Jun; 67(6):725-33. PubMed ID: 21445941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Primary and secondary pesticide drift profiles from a peach orchard.
    Zivan O; Bohbot-Raviv Y; Dubowski Y
    Chemosphere; 2017 Jun; 177():303-310. PubMed ID: 28314235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Drift of 10 herbicides after tractor spray application. 2. Primary drift (droplet drift).
    Carlsen SC; Spliid NH; Svensmark B
    Chemosphere; 2006 Jul; 64(5):778-86. PubMed ID: 16337986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Determination of spray drift and buffer zones in 3D crops using the ISO standard and new LiDAR methodologies.
    Torrent X; Gregorio E; Rosell-Polo JR; Arnó J; Peris M; van de Zande JC; Planas S
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 Apr; 714():136666. PubMed ID: 31986387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluationof compact air-induction flat fan nozzles for herbicide applications: Spray drift and biological efficacy.
    Wang S; Li X; Nuyttens D; Zhang L; Liu Y; Li X
    Front Plant Sci; 2023; 14():1018626. PubMed ID: 36818846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Field experiments to assess approaches for spray drift incident investigation.
    Rimmer DA; Johnson PD; Kelsey A; Warren ND
    Pest Manag Sci; 2009 Jun; 65(6):665-71. PubMed ID: 19291679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The agricultural dispersal-valley drift spray drift modeling system compared with pesticide drift data.
    Allwine KJ; Thistle HW; Teske ME; Anhold J
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2002 May; 21(5):1085-90. PubMed ID: 12013131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.