BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24561890)

  • 1. Automatic detection of trustworthiness of the face: a visual mismatch negativity study.
    Kovács-Bálint Z; Stefanics G; Trunk A; Hernádi I
    Acta Biol Hung; 2014 Mar; 65(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 24561890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Processing of unattended facial emotions: a visual mismatch negativity study.
    Stefanics G; Csukly G; Komlósi S; Czobor P; Czigler I
    Neuroimage; 2012 Feb; 59(3):3042-9. PubMed ID: 22037000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Individual differences in anxiety predict neural measures of visual working memory for untrustworthy faces.
    Meconi F; Luria R; Sessa P
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2014 Dec; 9(12):1872-9. PubMed ID: 24493843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An ERP study on the time course of facial trustworthiness appraisal.
    Yang D; Qi S; Ding C; Song Y
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 Jun; 496(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 21457755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Temporal dynamics of trustworthiness perception.
    Dzhelyova M; Perrett DI; Jentzsch I
    Brain Res; 2012 Jan; 1435():81-90. PubMed ID: 22206927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Abnormalities in early visual processes are linked to hypersociability and atypical evaluation of facial trustworthiness: An ERP study with Williams syndrome.
    Shore DM; Ng R; Bellugi U; Mills DL
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2017 Oct; 17(5):1002-1017. PubMed ID: 28685402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Trust at first sight: evidence from ERPs.
    Marzi T; Righi S; Ottonello S; Cincotta M; Viggiano MP
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2014 Jan; 9(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 22956674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A memory advantage for untrustworthy faces.
    Rule NO; Slepian ML; Ambady N
    Cognition; 2012 Nov; 125(2):207-18. PubMed ID: 22874071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visual mismatch negativity elicited by facial expressions: new evidence from the equiprobable paradigm.
    Li X; Lu Y; Sun G; Gao L; Zhao L
    Behav Brain Funct; 2012 Feb; 8():7. PubMed ID: 22300600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automatic detection of orientation changes of faces versus non-face objects: a visual MMN study.
    Wang W; Miao D; Zhao L
    Biol Psychol; 2014 Jul; 100():71-8. PubMed ID: 24859423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceived trustworthiness of faces drives trust behaviour in children.
    Ewing L; Caulfield F; Read A; Rhodes G
    Dev Sci; 2015 Mar; 18(2):327-34. PubMed ID: 25051999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Enhanced processing of untrustworthiness in natural faces with neutral expressions.
    Lischke A; Junge M; Hamm AO; Weymar M
    Emotion; 2018 Mar; 18(2):181-189. PubMed ID: 28447825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Oxytocin does not make a face appear more trustworthy but improves the accuracy of trustworthiness judgments.
    Lambert B; Declerck CH; Boone C
    Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2014 Feb; 40():60-8. PubMed ID: 24485476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual MMN elicited by orientation changes of faces.
    Wang W; Miao D; Zhao L
    J Integr Neurosci; 2014 Sep; 13(3):485-95. PubMed ID: 25164356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual mismatch negativity is unaffected by top-down prediction of the timing of deviant events.
    Kimura M
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 May; 236(5):1283-1292. PubMed ID: 29487967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do social utility judgments influence attentional processing?
    Shore DM; Heerey EA
    Cognition; 2013 Oct; 129(1):114-22. PubMed ID: 23887150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual mismatch negativity is sensitive to symmetry as a perceptual category.
    Kecskés-Kovács K; Sulykos I; Czigler I
    Eur J Neurosci; 2013 Feb; 37(4):662-7. PubMed ID: 23167956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automatic Change Detection in Older and Younger Women: A Visual Mismatch Negativity Study.
    Sulykos I; Gaál ZA; Czigler I
    Gerontology; 2018; 64(4):318-325. PubMed ID: 29698946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of attention control in visual mismatch negativity (vMMN) studies.
    Petro B; Gaál ZA; Kojouharova P; Czigler I
    Exp Brain Res; 2023 Apr; 241(4):1001-1008. PubMed ID: 36862235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.