274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24562546)
1. Clinical outcomes of robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: comparison with conventional laparoscopy and multifactorial analysis of the learning curve for robotic surgery.
Kuo LJ; Lin YK; Chang CC; Tai CJ; Chiou JF; Chang YJ
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2014 May; 29(5):555-62. PubMed ID: 24562546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer: clinical outcomes of open versus laparoscopic approach and multidimensional analysis of the learning curve for laparoscopic surgery.
Kuo LJ; Hung CS; Wang W; Tam KW; Lee HC; Liang HH; Chang YJ; Huang MT; Wei PL
J Surg Res; 2013 Aug; 183(2):524-30. PubMed ID: 23465434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Short-term clinical outcome of robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a retrospective comparison with conventional laparoscopy.
Park SY; Choi GS; Park JS; Kim HJ; Ryuk JP
Surg Endosc; 2013 Jan; 27(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 22752275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robotic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: starting with the perianal approach followed by robotic procedure.
Kang J; Hur H; Min BS; Lee KY; Kim NK
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jan; 19(1):154-5. PubMed ID: 21822556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: technique and short-term outcome for 29 consecutive patients.
Leong QM; Son DN; Cho JS; Baek SJ; Kwak JM; Amar AH; Kim SH
Surg Endosc; 2011 Sep; 25(9):2987-92. PubMed ID: 21484533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robotic versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: comparison of the operative, oncological, and functional outcomes.
Yoo BE; Cho JS; Shin JW; Lee DW; Kwak JM; Kim J; Kim SH
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Apr; 22(4):1219-25. PubMed ID: 25326398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robotic versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lee SH; Kim DH; Lim SW
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2018 Dec; 33(12):1741-1753. PubMed ID: 30187156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic versus laparoscopic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for rectal cancer.
Baek SJ; Al-Asari S; Jeong DH; Hur H; Min BS; Baik SH; Kim NK
Surg Endosc; 2013 Nov; 27(11):4157-63. PubMed ID: 23708725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multicentre study of robotic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer.
Park JS; Kim NK; Kim SH; Lee KY; Lee KY; Shin JY; Kim CN; Choi GS;
Br J Surg; 2015 Nov; 102(12):1567-73. PubMed ID: 26312601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Learning Curve of Robotic-Assisted Low Rectal Resection of a Novice Rectal Surgeon.
Foo CC; Law WL
World J Surg; 2016 Feb; 40(2):456-62. PubMed ID: 26423674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laparoscopic-Assisted Modified Intersphincter Resection for Ultralow Rectal Cancer.
Zhou H; Ruan C; Wang Z; Hu Z
Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Apr; 25(4):947-948. PubMed ID: 29340993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Video. Advantages of the laparoscopic approach for intersphincteric resection.
Hamada M; Matsumura T; Matsumoto T; Teraishi F; Ozaki K; Nakamura T; Fukui Y; Nishioka Y; Taniki T; Horimi T
Surg Endosc; 2011 May; 25(5):1661-3. PubMed ID: 21132330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Analysis on the technical characteristics and clinical efficacy of robotic-assisted intersphincteric resection for patients with low rectal cancer].
Liu HC; Li C; Zhang F; Wang XS; Zhang C; Luo HX; Song J; Yu PW; Tang B
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Dec; 22(12):1137-1143. PubMed ID: 31874529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic intersphincteric resection from a phase II trial to evaluate laparoscopic surgery for stage 0/I rectal cancer: Japan Society of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Lap RC.
Fujii S; Yamamoto S; Ito M; Yamaguchi S; Sakamoto K; Kinugasa Y; Kokuba Y; Okuda J; Yoshimura K; Watanabe M
Surg Endosc; 2012 Nov; 26(11):3067-76. PubMed ID: 22580882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Simultaneous development of laparoscopy and robotics provides acceptable perioperative outcomes and shows robotics to have a faster learning curve and to be overall faster in rectal cancer surgery: analysis of novice MIS surgeon learning curves.
Melich G; Hong YK; Kim J; Hur H; Baik SH; Kim NK; Sender Liberman A; Min BS
Surg Endosc; 2015 Mar; 29(3):558-68. PubMed ID: 25030474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is prior laparoscopy experience required for adaptation to robotic rectal surgery?: Feasibility of one-step transition from open to robotic surgery.
Kim IK; Kang J; Park YA; Kim NK; Sohn SK; Lee KY
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2014 Jun; 29(6):693-9. PubMed ID: 24770702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery.
Jiménez-Rodríguez RM; Díaz-Pavón JM; de la Portilla de Juan F; Prendes-Sillero E; Dussort HC; Padillo J
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2013 Jun; 28(6):815-21. PubMed ID: 23242270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Completely abdominal intersphincteric resection for lower rectal cancer: feasibility and comparison of robot-assisted and open surgery.
Kim JC; Lim SB; Yoon YS; Park IJ; Kim CW; Kim CN
Surg Endosc; 2014 Sep; 28(9):2734-44. PubMed ID: 24687417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a prospective pilot study.
Gómez Ruiz M; Parra IM; Palazuelos CM; Martín JA; Fernández CC; Diego JC; Fleitas MG
Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Jan; 58(1):145-53. PubMed ID: 25489707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The multiphasic learning curve for robot-assisted rectal surgery.
Sng KK; Hara M; Shin JW; Yoo BE; Yang KS; Kim SH
Surg Endosc; 2013 Sep; 27(9):3297-307. PubMed ID: 23508818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
