308 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24564186)
1. Improving reliability and absolute quantification of human brain microarray data by filtering and scaling probes using RNA-Seq.
Miller JA; Menon V; Goldy J; Kaykas A; Lee CK; Smith KA; Shen EH; Phillips JW; Lein ES; Hawrylycz MJ
BMC Genomics; 2014 Feb; 15(1):154. PubMed ID: 24564186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Seq-ing improved gene expression estimates from microarrays using machine learning.
Korir PK; Geeleher P; Seoighe C
BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Sep; 16():286. PubMed ID: 26338512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Correlation between RNA-Seq and microarrays results using TCGA data.
Chen L; Sun F; Yang X; Jin Y; Shi M; Wang L; Shi Y; Zhan C; Wang Q
Gene; 2017 Sep; 628():200-204. PubMed ID: 28734892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Integration of RNA-Seq data with heterogeneous microarray data for breast cancer profiling.
Castillo D; Gálvez JM; Herrera LJ; Román BS; Rojas F; Rojas I
BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Nov; 18(1):506. PubMed ID: 29157215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Using microarray-based subtyping methods for breast cancer in the era of high-throughput RNA sequencing.
Pedersen CB; Nielsen FC; Rossing M; Olsen LR
Mol Oncol; 2018 Dec; 12(12):2136-2146. PubMed ID: 30289602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimating accuracy of RNA-Seq and microarrays with proteomics.
Fu X; Fu N; Guo S; Yan Z; Xu Y; Hu H; Menzel C; Chen W; Li Y; Zeng R; Khaitovich P
BMC Genomics; 2009 Apr; 10():161. PubMed ID: 19371429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing bioinformatic gene expression profiling methods: microarray and RNA-Seq.
Mantione KJ; Kream RM; Kuzelova H; Ptacek R; Raboch J; Samuel JM; Stefano GB
Med Sci Monit Basic Res; 2014 Aug; 20():138-42. PubMed ID: 25149683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating gene expression in C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mouse striatum using RNA-Seq and microarrays.
Bottomly D; Walter NA; Hunter JE; Darakjian P; Kawane S; Buck KJ; Searles RP; Mooney M; McWeeney SK; Hitzemann R
PLoS One; 2011 Mar; 6(3):e17820. PubMed ID: 21455293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. RNA-Seq versus oligonucleotide array assessment of dose-dependent TCDD-elicited hepatic gene expression in mice.
Nault R; Fader KA; Zacharewski T
BMC Genomics; 2015 May; 16(1):373. PubMed ID: 25958198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A systematic comparison and evaluation of high density exon arrays and RNA-seq technology used to unravel the peripheral blood transcriptome of sickle cell disease.
Raghavachari N; Barb J; Yang Y; Liu P; Woodhouse K; Levy D; O'Donnell CJ; Munson PJ; Kato GJ
BMC Med Genomics; 2012 Jun; 5():28. PubMed ID: 22747986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cross-platform transcriptomic profiling of the response to recombinant human erythropoietin.
Wang G; Kitaoka T; Crawford A; Mao Q; Hesketh A; Guppy FM; Ash GI; Liu J; Gerstein MB; Pitsiladis YP
Sci Rep; 2021 Nov; 11(1):21705. PubMed ID: 34737331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transcriptional profiling of endocrine cerebro-osteodysplasia using microarray and next-generation sequencing.
Lahiry P; Lee LJ; Frey BJ; Rupar CA; Siu VM; Blencowe BJ; Hegele RA
PLoS One; 2011; 6(9):e25400. PubMed ID: 21980446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analysis of Microarray and RNA-seq Expression Profiling Data.
Hung JH; Weng Z
Cold Spring Harb Protoc; 2017 Mar; 2017(3):. PubMed ID: 27574194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. EXPRSS: an Illumina based high-throughput expression-profiling method to reveal transcriptional dynamics.
Rallapalli G; Kemen EM; Robert-Seilaniantz A; Segonzac C; Etherington GJ; Sohn KH; MacLean D; Jones JD
BMC Genomics; 2014 May; 15(1):341. PubMed ID: 24884414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A large-scale comparative study of isoform expressions measured on four platforms.
Zhang W; Petegrosso R; Chang JW; Sun J; Yong J; Chien J; Kuang R
BMC Genomics; 2020 Mar; 21(1):272. PubMed ID: 32228441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A flexible count data model to fit the wide diversity of expression profiles arising from extensively replicated RNA-seq experiments.
Esnaola M; Puig P; Gonzalez D; Castelo R; Gonzalez JR
BMC Bioinformatics; 2013 Aug; 14():254. PubMed ID: 23965047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. RNA-Seq vs dual- and single-channel microarray data: sensitivity analysis for differential expression and clustering.
Sîrbu A; Kerr G; Crane M; Ruskin HJ
PLoS One; 2012; 7(12):e50986. PubMed ID: 23251411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Redefinition of Affymetrix probe sets by sequence overlap with cDNA microarray probes reduces cross-platform inconsistencies in cancer-associated gene expression measurements.
Carter SL; Eklund AC; Mecham BH; Kohane IS; Szallasi Z
BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 6():107. PubMed ID: 15850491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genes, behavior and next-generation RNA sequencing.
Hitzemann R; Bottomly D; Darakjian P; Walter N; Iancu O; Searles R; Wilmot B; McWeeney S
Genes Brain Behav; 2013 Feb; 12(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 23194347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of RNA-Seq and high-density exon array for detecting differential gene expression between closely related species.
Liu S; Lin L; Jiang P; Wang D; Xing Y
Nucleic Acids Res; 2011 Jan; 39(2):578-88. PubMed ID: 20864445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]