499 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24564277)
21. Characterising ChIP-seq binding patterns by model-based peak shape deconvolution.
Mendoza-Parra MA; Nowicka M; Van Gool W; Gronemeyer H
BMC Genomics; 2013 Nov; 14(1):834. PubMed ID: 24279297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. PePr: a peak-calling prioritization pipeline to identify consistent or differential peaks from replicated ChIP-Seq data.
Zhang Y; Lin YH; Johnson TD; Rozek LS; Sartor MA
Bioinformatics; 2014 Sep; 30(18):2568-75. PubMed ID: 24894502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Application of topic models to a compendium of ChIP-Seq datasets uncovers recurrent transcriptional regulatory modules.
Yang G; Ma A; Qin ZS; Chen L
Bioinformatics; 2020 Apr; 36(8):2352-2358. PubMed ID: 31899481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Transcription factor-binding k-mer analysis clarifies the cell type dependency of binding specificities and cis-regulatory SNPs in humans.
Tahara S; Tsuchiya T; Matsumoto H; Ozaki H
BMC Genomics; 2023 Oct; 24(1):597. PubMed ID: 37805453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. CNN-Peaks: ChIP-Seq peak detection pipeline using convolutional neural networks that imitate human visual inspection.
Oh D; Strattan JS; Hur JK; Bento J; Urban AE; Song G; Cherry JM
Sci Rep; 2020 May; 10(1):7933. PubMed ID: 32404971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Pinpointing transcription factor binding sites from ChIP-seq data with SeqSite.
Wang X; Zhang X
BMC Syst Biol; 2011; 5 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S3. PubMed ID: 22784574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Discovering unknown human and mouse transcription factor binding sites and their characteristics from ChIP-seq data.
Yu CP; Kuo CH; Nelson CW; Chen CA; Soh ZT; Lin JJ; Hsiao RX; Chang CY; Li WH
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 May; 118(20):. PubMed ID: 33975951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. ChIP-BIT: Bayesian inference of target genes using a novel joint probabilistic model of ChIP-seq profiles.
Chen X; Jung JG; Shajahan-Haq AN; Clarke R; Shih IeM; Wang Y; Magnani L; Wang TL; Xuan J
Nucleic Acids Res; 2016 Apr; 44(7):e65. PubMed ID: 26704972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. FisherMP: fully parallel algorithm for detecting combinatorial motifs from large ChIP-seq datasets.
Zhang S; Liang Y; Wang X; Su Z; Chen Y
DNA Res; 2019 Jun; 26(3):231-242. PubMed ID: 30957858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Discovering transcription factor binding sites in highly repetitive regions of genomes with multi-read analysis of ChIP-Seq data.
Chung D; Kuan PF; Li B; Sanalkumar R; Liang K; Bresnick EH; Dewey C; Keleş S
PLoS Comput Biol; 2011 Jul; 7(7):e1002111. PubMed ID: 21779159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. COPS: detecting co-occurrence and spatial arrangement of transcription factor binding motifs in genome-wide datasets.
Ha N; Polychronidou M; Lohmann I
PLoS One; 2012; 7(12):e52055. PubMed ID: 23272209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Transcription Factor Binding Site Mapping Using ChIP-Seq.
Jaini S; Lyubetskaya A; Gomes A; Peterson M; Tae Park S; Raman S; Schoolnik G; Galagan J
Microbiol Spectr; 2014 Apr; 2(2):. PubMed ID: 26105820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Revealing transcription factor and histone modification co-localization and dynamics across cell lines by integrating ChIP-seq and RNA-seq data.
Zhang L; Xue G; Liu J; Li Q; Wang Y
BMC Genomics; 2018 Dec; 19(Suppl 10):914. PubMed ID: 30598100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. ChIPulate: A comprehensive ChIP-seq simulation pipeline.
Datta V; Hannenhalli S; Siddharthan R
PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Mar; 15(3):e1006921. PubMed ID: 30897079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The next generation of transcription factor binding site prediction.
Mathelier A; Wasserman WW
PLoS Comput Biol; 2013; 9(9):e1003214. PubMed ID: 24039567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. LASAGNA: a novel algorithm for transcription factor binding site alignment.
Lee C; Huang CH
BMC Bioinformatics; 2013 Mar; 14():108. PubMed ID: 23522376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Integrating genomic data to predict transcription factor binding.
Holloway DT; Kon M; DeLisi C
Genome Inform; 2005; 16(1):83-94. PubMed ID: 16362910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. De novo motif identification improves the accuracy of predicting transcription factor binding sites in ChIP-Seq data analysis.
Boeva V; Surdez D; Guillon N; Tirode F; Fejes AP; Delattre O; Barillot E
Nucleic Acids Res; 2010 Jun; 38(11):e126. PubMed ID: 20375099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A graphical model approach visualizes regulatory relationships between genome-wide transcription factor binding profiles.
Ng FSL; Ruau D; Wernisch L; Göttgens B
Brief Bioinform; 2018 Jan; 19(1):162-173. PubMed ID: 27780826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Asymmetric Conservation within Pairs of Co-Occurred Motifs Mediates Weak Direct Binding of Transcription Factors in ChIP-Seq Data.
Levitsky V; Oshchepkov D; Zemlyanskaya E; Merkulova T
Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Aug; 21(17):. PubMed ID: 32825662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
