BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

371 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24564528)

  • 1. Cell-type and transcription factor specific enrichment of transcriptional cofactor motifs in ENCODE ChIP-seq data.
    Goi C; Little P; Xie C
    BMC Genomics; 2013; 14 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S2. PubMed ID: 24564528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cell-type specificity of ChIP-predicted transcription factor binding sites.
    Håndstad T; Rye M; Močnik R; Drabløs F; Sætrom P
    BMC Genomics; 2012 Aug; 13():372. PubMed ID: 22863112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. BinDNase: a discriminatory approach for transcription factor binding prediction using DNase I hypersensitivity data.
    Kähärä J; Lähdesmäki H
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Sep; 31(17):2852-9. PubMed ID: 25957350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. TICA: Transcriptional Interaction and Coregulation Analyzer.
    Perna S; Pinoli P; Ceri S; Wong L
    Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics; 2018 Oct; 16(5):342-353. PubMed ID: 30578913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Non-targeted transcription factors motifs are a systemic component of ChIP-seq datasets.
    Worsley Hunt R; Wasserman WW
    Genome Biol; 2014 Jul; 15(7):412. PubMed ID: 25070602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A map of direct TF-DNA interactions in the human genome.
    Gheorghe M; Sandve GK; Khan A; Chèneby J; Ballester B; Mathelier A
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2019 Feb; 47(4):e21. PubMed ID: 30517703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. ChIP-Seq Data Analysis to Define Transcriptional Regulatory Networks.
    Pavesi G
    Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol; 2017; 160():1-14. PubMed ID: 28070596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. MixChIP: a probabilistic method for cell type specific protein-DNA binding analysis.
    Rautio S; Lähdesmäki H
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Dec; 16():413. PubMed ID: 26703974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Combining transcription factor binding affinities with open-chromatin data for accurate gene expression prediction.
    Schmidt F; Gasparoni N; Gasparoni G; Gianmoena K; Cadenas C; Polansky JK; Ebert P; Nordström K; Barann M; Sinha A; Fröhler S; Xiong J; Dehghani Amirabad A; Behjati Ardakani F; Hutter B; Zipprich G; Felder B; Eils J; Brors B; Chen W; Hengstler JG; Hamann A; Lengauer T; Rosenstiel P; Walter J; Schulz MH
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2017 Jan; 45(1):54-66. PubMed ID: 27899623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Imputation for transcription factor binding predictions based on deep learning.
    Qin Q; Feng J
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Feb; 13(2):e1005403. PubMed ID: 28234893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improving analysis of transcription factor binding sites within ChIP-Seq data based on topological motif enrichment.
    Worsley Hunt R; Mathelier A; Del Peso L; Wasserman WW
    BMC Genomics; 2014 Jun; 15(1):472. PubMed ID: 24927817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Integrative analysis of ChIP-chip and ChIP-seq dataset.
    Zhu LJ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1067():105-24. PubMed ID: 23975789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. PscanChIP: Finding over-represented transcription factor-binding site motifs and their correlations in sequences from ChIP-Seq experiments.
    Zambelli F; Pesole G; Pavesi G
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2013 Jul; 41(Web Server issue):W535-43. PubMed ID: 23748563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transcription factor-binding k-mer analysis clarifies the cell type dependency of binding specificities and cis-regulatory SNPs in humans.
    Tahara S; Tsuchiya T; Matsumoto H; Ozaki H
    BMC Genomics; 2023 Oct; 24(1):597. PubMed ID: 37805453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. ChIP-GSM: Inferring active transcription factor modules to predict functional regulatory elements.
    Chen X; Neuwald AF; Hilakivi-Clarke L; Clarke R; Xuan J
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2021 Jul; 17(7):e1009203. PubMed ID: 34292930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Asymmetric Conservation within Pairs of Co-Occurred Motifs Mediates Weak Direct Binding of Transcription Factors in ChIP-Seq Data.
    Levitsky V; Oshchepkov D; Zemlyanskaya E; Merkulova T
    Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Aug; 21(17):. PubMed ID: 32825662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Revealing transcription factor and histone modification co-localization and dynamics across cell lines by integrating ChIP-seq and RNA-seq data.
    Zhang L; Xue G; Liu J; Li Q; Wang Y
    BMC Genomics; 2018 Dec; 19(Suppl 10):914. PubMed ID: 30598100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Statistics of protein-DNA binding and the total number of binding sites for a transcription factor in the mammalian genome.
    Kuznetsov VA; Singh O; Jenjaroenpun P
    BMC Genomics; 2010 Feb; 11 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S12. PubMed ID: 20158869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Chromatin Immunoprecipitation for Identification of Protein-DNA Interactions in Human Cells.
    Larsen BD; Madsen MR; Nielsen R; Mandrup S
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1794():335-352. PubMed ID: 29855970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using combined evidence from replicates to evaluate ChIP-seq peaks.
    Jalili V; Matteucci M; Masseroli M; Morelli MJ
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Sep; 31(17):2761-9. PubMed ID: 25957351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.