These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

614 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24564540)

  • 1. Examining the relationship between immediate serial recall and immediate free recall: common effects of phonological loop variables but only limited evidence for the phonological loop.
    Spurgeon J; Ward G; Matthews WJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jul; 40(4):1110-41. PubMed ID: 24564540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Examining the relationship between free recall and immediate serial recall: the effects of list length and output order.
    Ward G; Tan L; Grenfell-Essam R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Sep; 36(5):1207-41. PubMed ID: 20804293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Beginning at the beginning: Recall order and the number of words to be recalled.
    Tan L; Ward G; Paulauskaite L; Markou M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1282-92. PubMed ID: 26844583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of selective attention and a stimulus prefix on the output order of immediate free recall of short and long lists.
    Grenfell-Essam R; Ward G
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2015 Mar; 69(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 25730637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of rehearsal on the output order of immediate free recall of short and long lists.
    Grenfell-Essam R; Ward G; Tan L
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Mar; 39(2):317-47. PubMed ID: 22774850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Why do participants initiate free recall of short lists of words with the first list item? Toward a general episodic memory explanation.
    Spurgeon J; Ward G; Matthews WJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Nov; 40(6):1551-67. PubMed ID: 24933695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Opposing effects of phonological similarity on item and order memory of words and nonwords in the serial recall task.
    Lian A; Karlsen PJ; Eriksen TB
    Memory; 2004 May; 12(3):314-37. PubMed ID: 15279435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Common modality effects in immediate free recall and immediate serial recall.
    Grenfell-Essam R; Ward G; Tan L
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1909-1933. PubMed ID: 28557502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Newly-acquired words are more phonologically robust in verbal short-term memory when they have associated semantic representations.
    Savill N; Ellis AW; Jefferies E
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Apr; 98():85-97. PubMed ID: 26965397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recall of short word lists presented visually at fast rates: effects of phonological similarity and word length.
    Coltheart V; Langdon R
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Mar; 26(2):330-42. PubMed ID: 9584440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dissimilar items benefit from phonological similarity in serial recall.
    Farrell S; Lewandowsky S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):838-49. PubMed ID: 14516217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can the effects of temporal grouping explain the similarities and differences between free recall and serial recall?
    Spurgeon J; Ward G; Matthews WJ; Farrell S
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Apr; 43(3):469-88. PubMed ID: 25331276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. When does length cause the word length effect?
    Jalbert A; Neath I; Bireta TJ; Surprenant AM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):338-53. PubMed ID: 21171805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Examining the relationship between free recall and immediate serial recall: the effect of concurrent task performance.
    Bhatarah P; Ward G; Tan L
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):215-29. PubMed ID: 16569142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing the effect of lexical variables in backward recall.
    Guérard K; Saint-Aubin J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Mar; 38(2):312-24. PubMed ID: 21928932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Disruption of verbal STM by irrelevant speech, articulatory suppression, and manual tapping: do they have a common source?
    Larsen JD; Baddeley A
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Nov; 56(8):1249-68. PubMed ID: 14578082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Control processes in short-term storage: Retrieval strategies in immediate recall depend upon the number of words to be recalled.
    Ward G; Tan L
    Mem Cognit; 2019 May; 47(4):658-682. PubMed ID: 30617748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Phonological short-term store and the nature of the recency effect: evidence from neuropsychology.
    Vallar G; Papagano C
    Brain Cogn; 1986 Oct; 5(4):428-42. PubMed ID: 3580186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Strong and long: effects of word length on phonological binding in verbal short-term memory.
    Jefferies E; Frankish C; Noble K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Feb; 64(2):241-60. PubMed ID: 20680892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A multiple case study of verbal short-term memory in velo-cardio-facial syndrome.
    Majerus S; Glaser B; Van der Linden M; Eliez S
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2006 Jun; 50(Pt 6):457-69. PubMed ID: 16672039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.