These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24564543)

  • 1. Is performance in task-cuing experiments mediated by task set selection or associative compound retrieval?
    Forrest CL; Monsell S; McLaren IP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jul; 40(4):1002-24. PubMed ID: 24564543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Memory as discrimination: a challenge to the encoding-retrieval match principle.
    Poirier M; Nairne JS; Morin C; Zimmermann FG; Koutmeridou K; Fowler J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jan; 38(1):16-29. PubMed ID: 21823814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cue-task associations in task switching.
    Gade M; Koch I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Jun; 60(6):762-9. PubMed ID: 17514592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is it harder to switch among a larger set of tasks?
    van 't Wout F; Lavric A; Monsell S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Mar; 41(2):363-76. PubMed ID: 25528089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Aging and memory as discrimination: Influences of encoding specificity, cue overload, and prior knowledge.
    Badham SP; Poirier M; Gandhi N; Hadjivassiliou A; Maylor EA
    Psychol Aging; 2016 Nov; 31(7):758-770. PubMed ID: 27831714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Implicit sequence learning based on instructed task set.
    Gaschler R; Frensch PA; Cohen A; Wenke D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Sep; 38(5):1389-407. PubMed ID: 22545612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neural representation of stimulus-response associations during task preparation.
    Cookson SL; Hazeltine E; Schumacher EH
    Brain Res; 2016 Oct; 1648(Pt A):496-505. PubMed ID: 27527267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implicit task sets in task switching?
    Dreisbach G; Goschke T; Haider H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1221-33. PubMed ID: 17087579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automatic Retrieval of Newly Instructed Cue-Task Associations Seen in Task-Conflict Effects in the First Trial after Cue-Task Instructions.
    Meiran N; Pereg M
    Exp Psychol; 2017 Jan; 64(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 28219260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can the task-cuing paradigm measure an endogenous task-set reconfiguration process?
    Monsell S; Mizon GA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Jun; 32(3):493-516. PubMed ID: 16822121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of noticing in prospective memory forgetting.
    Kliegel M; Guynn MJ; Zimmer H
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Jun; 64(3):226-32. PubMed ID: 17113673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of associative learning on age differences in task-set switching.
    Kray J; Eppinger B
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Nov; 123(3):187-203. PubMed ID: 16564483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are stimulus-response rules represented phonologically for task-set preparation and maintenance?
    van 't Wout F; Lavric A; Monsell S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1538-51. PubMed ID: 23421514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dissociations between expectancy and performance in simple and two-choice reaction-time tasks: A test of associative and nonassociative explanations.
    Barrett LC; Livesey EJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):864-77. PubMed ID: 20565206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Part-list cuing of associative chains: tests of strategy disruption.
    Serra M; Oswald KM
    J Gen Psychol; 2006 Jul; 133(3):301-17. PubMed ID: 16937897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Task switching and shifting between stopping and going: Developmental change in between-trial control adjustments.
    Huizinga M; van der Molen MW
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2011 Mar; 108(3):484-503. PubMed ID: 21092983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigating cue competition in contextual cuing of visual search.
    Beesley T; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):709-25. PubMed ID: 21895393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differential effects of cue changes and task changes on task-set selection costs.
    Mayr U; Kliegl R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 May; 29(3):362-72. PubMed ID: 12776747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Unconscious activation of task sets.
    Reuss H; Kiesel A; Kunde W; Hommel B
    Conscious Cogn; 2011 Sep; 20(3):556-67. PubMed ID: 21396830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Heightened conflict in cue-target translation increases backward inhibition in set switching.
    Grange JA; Houghton G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):1003-9. PubMed ID: 20565215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.