These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24564543)

  • 41. Transfer of response codes from choice-response to go/no-go tasks.
    Ansorge U; Wühr P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jun; 62(6):1216-35. PubMed ID: 19096944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Modeling task switching without switching tasks: a short-term priming account of explicitly cued performance.
    Schneider DW; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Aug; 134(3):343-67. PubMed ID: 16131268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The effects of recent practice on task switching.
    Yeung N; Monsell S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):919-36. PubMed ID: 14585014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Advance preparation in task switching: what work is being done?
    Altmann EM
    Psychol Sci; 2004 Sep; 15(9):616-22. PubMed ID: 15327633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Response selection and response execution in task switching: evidence from a go-signal paradigm.
    Philipp AM; Jolicoeur P; Falkenstein M; Koch I
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Nov; 33(6):1062-75. PubMed ID: 17983313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Switching in the cocktail party: exploring intentional control of auditory selective attention.
    Koch I; Lawo V; Fels J; Vorländer M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1140-7. PubMed ID: 21553997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Contextual cues aid recovery from interruption: the role of associative activation.
    Hodgetts HM; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Sep; 32(5):1120-32. PubMed ID: 16938050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Judgements of relative direction: the effect of task instructions on spatial recall.
    Donaldson P; Tlauka M; Robertson C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013 Jun; 66(6):1090-103. PubMed ID: 23057609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Across-task long-term priming: interaction of task readiness and automatic retrieval.
    Waszak F
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jul; 63(7):1414-29. PubMed ID: 20043270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Priming or executive control? Associative priming of cue encoding increases "switch costs" in the explicit task-cuing procedure.
    Logan GD; Schneider DW
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Sep; 34(6):1250-9. PubMed ID: 17225506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Differences in trace and delay visuomotor associative learning in cerebellar patients.
    Maschke M; Drepper J; Bürgerhoff K; Calabrese S; Kolb FP; Daum I; Diener HC; Timmann D
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Dec; 147(4):538-48. PubMed ID: 12444486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Selective attention in human associative learning and recognition memory.
    Griffiths O; Mitchell CJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Nov; 137(4):626-48. PubMed ID: 18999357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Associative repetition priming as a measure of human contingency learning: evidence of forward and backward blocking.
    Morís J; Cobos PL; Luque D; López FJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Feb; 143(1):77-93. PubMed ID: 23230993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. On the minimization of task switch costs following long-term training.
    Berryhill ME; Hughes HC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Apr; 71(3):503-14. PubMed ID: 19304641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. ERP correlates of intentional forgetting.
    Mecklinger A; Parra M; Waldhauser GT
    Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1255():132-47. PubMed ID: 19103178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Comparing learned predictiveness effects within and across compound discriminations.
    Livesey EJ; Thorwart A; De Fina NL; Harris JA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Oct; 37(4):446-65. PubMed ID: 21517197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. ERPs dissociate the effects of switching task sets and task cues.
    Nicholson R; Karayanidis F; Bumak E; Poboka D; Michie PT
    Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 1095(1):107-23. PubMed ID: 16714004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The control of memory retrieval: insights from event-related potentials.
    Werkle-Bergner M; Mecklinger A; Kray J; Meyer P; Düzel E
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):599-614. PubMed ID: 16099369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Interference between outcomes, spontaneous recovery, and context effects as measured by a cued response reaction time task: evidence for associative retrieval models.
    González-Martín E; Cobos PL; Morís J; López FJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Oct; 38(4):419-32. PubMed ID: 22905829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Components of task-set reconfiguration: differential effects of 'switch-to' and 'switch-away' cues.
    Nicholson R; Karayanidis F; Davies A; Michie PT
    Brain Res; 2006 Nov; 1121(1):160-76. PubMed ID: 17010947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.