152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24564718)
1. Spectral probabilities of top-down tandem mass spectra.
Liu X; Segar MW; Li SC; Kim S
BMC Genomics; 2014; 15 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S9. PubMed ID: 24564718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Markov Chain Monte Carlo Method for Estimating the Statistical Significance of Proteoform Identifications by Top-Down Mass Spectrometry.
Kou Q; Wang Z; Lubeckyj RA; Wu S; Sun L; Liu X
J Proteome Res; 2019 Mar; 18(3):878-889. PubMed ID: 30638379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The generating function approach for Peptide identification in spectral networks.
Guthals A; Boucher C; Bandeira N
J Comput Biol; 2015 May; 22(5):353-66. PubMed ID: 25423621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A graph-based filtering method for top-down mass spectral identification.
Yang R; Zhu D
BMC Genomics; 2018 Sep; 19(Suppl 7):666. PubMed ID: 30255788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A suffix tree approach to the interpretation of tandem mass spectra: applications to peptides of non-specific digestion and post-translational modifications.
Lu B; Chen T
Bioinformatics; 2003 Oct; 19 Suppl 2():ii113-21. PubMed ID: 14534180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Binary Classifier for Computing Posterior Error Probabilities in MetaMorpheus.
Shortreed MR; Millikin RJ; Liu L; Rolfs Z; Miller RM; Schaffer LV; Frey BL; Smith LM
J Proteome Res; 2021 Apr; 20(4):1997-2004. PubMed ID: 33683901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The spectral networks paradigm in high throughput mass spectrometry.
Guthals A; Watrous JD; Dorrestein PC; Bandeira N
Mol Biosyst; 2012 Oct; 8(10):2535-44. PubMed ID: 22610447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Protein Identification from Tandem Mass Spectra by Database Searching.
Edwards NJ
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1558():357-380. PubMed ID: 28150247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Capillary Zone Electrophoresis-Tandem Mass Spectrometry with Activated Ion Electron Transfer Dissociation for Large-scale Top-down Proteomics.
McCool EN; Lodge JM; Basharat AR; Liu X; Coon JJ; Sun L
J Am Soc Mass Spectrom; 2019 Dec; 30(12):2470-2479. PubMed ID: 31073891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. MUMAL: multivariate analysis in shotgun proteomics using machine learning techniques.
Cerqueira FR; Ferreira RS; Oliveira AP; Gomes AP; Ramos HJ; Graber A; Baumgartner C
BMC Genomics; 2012; 13 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S4. PubMed ID: 23095859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Identification of Unexpected Protein Modifications by Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics.
Ahmadi S; Winter D
Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1871():225-251. PubMed ID: 30276743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An accurate and efficient algorithm for Peptide and ptm identification by tandem mass spectrometry.
Ning K; Ng HK; Leong HW
Genome Inform; 2007; 19():119-30. PubMed ID: 18546510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Refining similarity scoring to enable decoy-free validation in spectral library searching.
Shao W; Zhu K; Lam H
Proteomics; 2013 Nov; 13(22):3273-83. PubMed ID: 24115759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improving Proteoform Identifications in Complex Systems Through Integration of Bottom-Up and Top-Down Data.
Schaffer LV; Millikin RJ; Shortreed MR; Scalf M; Smith LM
J Proteome Res; 2020 Aug; 19(8):3510-3517. PubMed ID: 32584579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A graph-based approach for proteoform identification and quantification using top-down homogeneous multiplexed tandem mass spectra.
Zhu K; Liu X
BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Aug; 19(Suppl 9):280. PubMed ID: 30367573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Spectral probabilities and generating functions of tandem mass spectra: a strike against decoy databases.
Kim S; Gupta N; Pevzner PA
J Proteome Res; 2008 Aug; 7(8):3354-63. PubMed ID: 18597511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficient discovery of abundant post-translational modifications and spectral pairs using peptide mass and retention time differences.
Fu Y; Jia W; Lu Z; Wang H; Yuan Z; Chi H; Li Y; Xiu L; Wang W; Liu C; Wang L; Sun R; Gao W; Qian X; He SM
BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Jan; 10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S50. PubMed ID: 19208153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. False discovery rate estimation using candidate peptides for each spectrum.
Lee S; Park H; Kim H
BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Nov; 23(1):454. PubMed ID: 36319948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MixGF: spectral probabilities for mixture spectra from more than one peptide.
Wang J; Bourne PE; Bandeira N
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2014 Dec; 13(12):3688-97. PubMed ID: 25225354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A survey of computational methods and error rate estimation procedures for peptide and protein identification in shotgun proteomics.
Nesvizhskii AI
J Proteomics; 2010 Oct; 73(11):2092-123. PubMed ID: 20816881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
