232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24564973)
1. Mass type-specific sparse representation for mass classification in computer-aided detection on mammograms.
Kim DH; Lee SH; Ro YM
Biomed Eng Online; 2013; 12 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S3. PubMed ID: 24564973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. False-positive reduction in computer-aided mass detection using mammographic texture analysis and classification.
Dhahbi S; Barhoumi W; Kurek J; Swiderski B; Kruk M; Zagrouba E
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Jul; 160():75-83. PubMed ID: 29728249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. External validation of a publicly available computer assisted diagnostic tool for mammographic mass lesions with two high prevalence research datasets.
Benndorf M; Burnside ES; Herda C; Langer M; Kotter E
Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4987-96. PubMed ID: 26233224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An Improved CAD System for Breast Cancer Diagnosis Based on Generalized Pseudo-Zernike Moment and Ada-DEWNN Classifier.
Singh SP; Urooj S
J Med Syst; 2016 Apr; 40(4):105. PubMed ID: 26892455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transfer Learning From Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Diagnosis: A Comparison of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Full-Field Digital Mammography.
Mendel K; Li H; Sheth D; Giger M
Acad Radiol; 2019 Jun; 26(6):735-743. PubMed ID: 30076083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Consistent performance measurement of a system to detect masses in mammograms based on blind feature extraction.
García-Manso A; García-Orellana CJ; González-Velasco H; Gallardo-Caballero R; Macías MM
Biomed Eng Online; 2013 Jan; 12():2. PubMed ID: 23305491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Globally supported radial basis function based collocation method for evolution of level set in mass segmentation using mammograms.
Kashyap KL; Bajpai MK; Khanna P
Comput Biol Med; 2017 Aug; 87():22-37. PubMed ID: 28549292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Grouped fuzzy SVM with EM-based partition of sample space for clustered microcalcification detection.
Wang H; Feng J; Wang H
Technol Health Care; 2017 Jul; 25(S1):325-336. PubMed ID: 28582921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multi-scale textural feature extraction and particle swarm optimization based model selection for false positive reduction in mammography.
Zyout I; Czajkowska J; Grzegorzek M
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2015 Dec; 46 Pt 2():95-107. PubMed ID: 25795630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Developing a new case based computer-aided detection scheme and an adaptive cueing method to improve performance in detecting mammographic lesions.
Tan M; Aghaei F; Wang Y; Zheng B
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jan; 62(2):358-376. PubMed ID: 27997380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computer-aided diagnosis of masses with full-field digital mammography.
Li L; Clark RA; Thomas JA
Acad Radiol; 2002 Jan; 9(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 11918357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An Efficient Approach for Automated Mass Segmentation and Classification in Mammograms.
Dong M; Lu X; Ma Y; Guo Y; Ma Y; Wang K
J Digit Imaging; 2015 Oct; 28(5):613-25. PubMed ID: 25776767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detection of cancerous masses in mammograms by template matching: optimization of template brightness distribution by means of evolutionary algorithm.
Bator M; Nieniewski M
J Digit Imaging; 2012 Feb; 25(1):162-72. PubMed ID: 21748410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computer-aided diagnosis of malignant mammograms using Zernike moments and SVM.
Sharma S; Khanna P
J Digit Imaging; 2015 Feb; 28(1):77-90. PubMed ID: 25005867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiomics robustness assessment and classification evaluation: A two-stage method demonstrated on multivendor FFDM.
Robinson K; Li H; Lan L; Schacht D; Giger M
Med Phys; 2019 May; 46(5):2145-2156. PubMed ID: 30802972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of a computer-aided detection (CAD)-enhanced 2D synthetic mammogram: comparison with standard synthetic 2D mammograms and conventional 2D digital mammography.
James JJ; Giannotti E; Chen Y
Clin Radiol; 2018 Oct; 73(10):886-892. PubMed ID: 29970247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Classification of Benign and Malignant Breast Masses on Mammograms for Large Datasets using Core Vector Machines.
Jebamony J; Jacob D
Curr Med Imaging; 2020; 16(6):703-710. PubMed ID: 32723242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improving performance of computer-aided detection scheme by combining results from two machine learning classifiers.
Park SC; Pu J; Zheng B
Acad Radiol; 2009 Mar; 16(3):266-74. PubMed ID: 19201355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Using computer-extracted image features for modeling of error-making patterns in detection of mammographic masses among radiology residents.
Zhang J; Lo JY; Kuzmiak CM; Ghate SV; Yoon SC; Mazurowski MA
Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):091907. PubMed ID: 25186394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of methods for three-class mammograms classification.
Milosevic M; Jovanovic Z; Jankovic D
Technol Health Care; 2017 Aug; 25(4):657-670. PubMed ID: 28436405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
