These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24564975)

  • 1. A novel approach to minimize false discovery rate in genome-wide data analysis.
    Bei Y; Hong P
    BMC Syst Biol; 2013; 7 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S1. PubMed ID: 24564975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Re-sampling strategy to improve the estimation of number of null hypotheses in FDR control under strong correlation structures.
    Lu X; Perkins DL
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 May; 8():157. PubMed ID: 17509157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of false discovery rate methods in identifying genes with differential expression.
    Qian HR; Huang S
    Genomics; 2005 Oct; 86(4):495-503. PubMed ID: 16054333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A classification approach for DNA methylation profiling with bisulfite next-generation sequencing data.
    Cheng L; Zhu Y
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Jan; 30(2):172-9. PubMed ID: 24273245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A note on using permutation-based false discovery rate estimates to compare different analysis methods for microarray data.
    Xie Y; Pan W; Khodursky AB
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 21(23):4280-8. PubMed ID: 16188930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identifying differentially expressed genes using false discovery rate controlling procedures.
    Reiner A; Yekutieli D; Benjamini Y
    Bioinformatics; 2003 Feb; 19(3):368-75. PubMed ID: 12584122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comprehensive evaluation of SAM, the SAM R-package and a simple modification to improve its performance.
    Zhang S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Jun; 8():230. PubMed ID: 17603887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An investigation on performance of Significance Analysis of Microarray (SAM) for the comparisons of several treatments with one control in the presence of small-variance genes.
    Lin D; Shkedy Z; Burzykowski T; Ion R; Göhlmann HW; Bondt AD; Perer T; Geerts T; Van den Wyngaert I; Bijnens L
    Biom J; 2008 Oct; 50(5):801-23. PubMed ID: 18932139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An adaptive single-step FDR procedure with applications to DNA microarray analysis.
    Iyer V; Sarkar S
    Biom J; 2007 Feb; 49(1):127-35. PubMed ID: 17342954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Power and type I error rate of false discovery rate approaches in genome-wide association studies.
    Yang Q; Cui J; Chazaro I; Cupples LA; Demissie S
    BMC Genet; 2005 Dec; 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S134. PubMed ID: 16451593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimation of false discovery proportion under general dependence.
    Pawitan Y; Calza S; Ploner A
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Dec; 22(24):3025-31. PubMed ID: 17046978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rank-invariant resampling based estimation of false discovery rate for analysis of small sample microarray data.
    Jain N; Cho H; O'Connell M; Lee JK
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 6():187. PubMed ID: 16042779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How accurately can we control the FDR in analyzing microarray data?
    Jung SH; Jang W
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Jul; 22(14):1730-6. PubMed ID: 16644791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. High-throughput DNA methylation datasets for evaluating false discovery rate methodologies.
    Asomaning N; Archer KJ
    Comput Stat Data Anal; 2012 Jun; 56(6):1748-1756. PubMed ID: 22611297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stratified false discovery control for large-scale hypothesis testing with application to genome-wide association studies.
    Sun L; Craiu RV; Paterson AD; Bull SB
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Sep; 30(6):519-30. PubMed ID: 16800000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On correcting the overestimation of the permutation-based false discovery rate estimator.
    Jiao S; Zhang S
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Aug; 24(15):1655-61. PubMed ID: 18573796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. False discovery rate, sensitivity and sample size for microarray studies.
    Pawitan Y; Michiels S; Koscielny S; Gusnanto A; Ploner A
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(13):3017-24. PubMed ID: 15840707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of dependence in high-dimensional multiple testing problems.
    Kim KI; van de Wiel MA
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Feb; 9():114. PubMed ID: 18298808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improving power of genome-wide association studies with weighted false discovery rate control and prioritized subset analysis.
    Lin WY; Lee WC
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(4):e33716. PubMed ID: 22496761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Meta-analysis based on control of false discovery rate: combining yeast ChIP-chip datasets.
    Pyne S; Futcher B; Skiena S
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Oct; 22(20):2516-22. PubMed ID: 16908499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.