BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2456532)

  • 1. Comparison of unipolar and bipolar active fixation atrial pacing leads.
    Kay GN; Epstein AE; Plumb VJ
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1988 May; 11(5):544-9. PubMed ID: 2456532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Active fixation atrial leads: randomized comparison of two lead designs.
    Kay GN; Anderson K; Epstein AE; Plumb VJ
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1989 Aug; 12(8):1355-61. PubMed ID: 2476759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Unipolar sensing in contemporary pacemakers: using myopotential testing to define optimal sensitivity settings.
    Exner DV; Rothschild JM; Heal S; Gillis AM
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 1998 Mar; 2(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 9869994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Successful results of a bipolar active fixation lead for atrial application: an interim analysis.
    Buys EM; Van Hemel NM; Jessurun ER; Poot B; Kelder JC; Defauw JJ
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2000 Apr; 23(4 Pt 1):499-503. PubMed ID: 10793441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Unsatisfying results in long-term atrial pacing with a bipolar active fixation atrial lead.
    Buys EM; van Hemel NM; Kelder JC; van Dessel PF; Bakema L
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 Dec; 17(12 Pt 1):2292-6. PubMed ID: 7885937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Single lead DDD system: a comparative evaluation of unipolar, bipolar, and overlapping biphasic stimulation and the effects of right atrial floating electrode location on atrial pacing and sensing thresholds.
    Tse HF; Lau CP; Leung SK; Leung Z; Mehta N
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11 Pt 2):1758-63. PubMed ID: 8945035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrophysiological properties of a new permanent endocardial lead for uni- and bipolar pacing.
    Breivik K; Engedal H; Ohm OJ
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1982 Mar; 5(2):268-74. PubMed ID: 6176968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Uni- and bipolar pacing threshold measurements with capturecontrol, a new automatic pacemaker function for capture verification. Comparison of the automatic and the manual pacing threshold measurement.
    Schuchert A; Meinertz T
    Cardiology; 1999; 92(3):210-3. PubMed ID: 10754353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acute changes in pacing threshold and R- or P-wave amplitude during permanent pacemaker implantation.
    de Buitleir M; Kou WH; Schmaltz S; Morady F
    Am J Cardiol; 1990 Apr; 65(15):999-1003. PubMed ID: 2327362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bipolar active fixation atrial leads: comparison of two new lead models.
    Kindermann M; Schwaab B; Fröhlig G; Lawall P; Schieffer H
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Nov; 21(11 Pt 2):2285-90. PubMed ID: 9825334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Initial experience with a co-radial bipolar pacing lead.
    Tang C; Yeung-Lai-Wah JA; Qi A; Mills P; Clark J; Tyers F
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Jul; 20(7):1800-7. PubMed ID: 9249835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Should unipolar leads be implanted in the atrium? A Holter electrocardiographic comparison of threshold adapted unipolar and high sensitive bipolar sensing.
    Wiegand UK; Schier H; Bode F; Brandes A; Potratz J
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Aug; 21(8):1601-8. PubMed ID: 9725160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Atrial pacing and sensing characteristics in heart failure patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Schuchert A; Aydin MA; Israel C; Gaby G; Paul V
    Europace; 2005 Mar; 7(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 15763532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Comparison of active and passive fixation of steroid emitting atrial electrodes].
    Schuchert A; van Langen H; Michels K; Meinertz T
    Z Kardiol; 1996 Apr; 85(4):255-9. PubMed ID: 8693768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Feasibility of dual-chamber (DDD) pacing via a single-pass (VDD) pacing lead employing a floating atrial ring (dipole): case series, future considerations, and refinements.
    Kassotis J; Voigt L; Mongwa M; Reddy CV
    Angiology; 2005; 56(3):323-9. PubMed ID: 15889201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-term performance of bipolar epicardial atrial pacing using an active fixation bipolar endocardial lead.
    Epstein MR; Walsh EP; Saul JP; Triedman JK; Mayer JE; Gamble WJ
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 May; 21(5):1098-104. PubMed ID: 9604242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A fractally coated, 1.3 mm2 high impedance pacing electrode.
    Fröhlig G; Bolz A; Ströbel J; Rutz M; Lawall P; Schwerdt H; Schaldach M; Schieffer H
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Jun; 21(6):1239-46. PubMed ID: 9633066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Appraisal of pacing lead performance from the Danish Pacemaker Register.
    Møller M; Arnsbo P
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Sep; 19(9):1327-36. PubMed ID: 8880796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of spontaneous atrial fibrillation electrogram potentials with the P-wave electrogram amplitude in dual chamber pacing with unipolar atrial sensing.
    Lewalter T; Schimpf R; Kulik D; Wolpert C; Jung W; Lüderitz B
    Europace; 2000 Apr; 2(2):136-40. PubMed ID: 11227585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acute and chronic stability of atrial screw-in leads.
    Nakazato Y; Nakata Y; Ohno Y; Sumiyoshi M; Hisaoka H; Ogura S; Yamaguchi H; Hazato N
    Jpn Circ J; 1991 Jul; 55(7):665-8. PubMed ID: 1880898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.