715 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24565430)
1. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery.
; ; Caughey AB; Cahill AG; Guise JM; Rouse DJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Mar; 210(3):179-93. PubMed ID: 24565430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Obstetric care consensus no. 1: safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery.
Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Mar; 123(3):693-711. PubMed ID: 24553167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A multicenter controlled trial of fetal pulse oximetry in the intrapartum management of nonreassuring fetal heart rate patterns.
Garite TJ; Dildy GA; McNamara H; Nageotte MP; Boehm FH; Dellinger EH; Knuppel RA; Porreco RP; Miller HS; Sunderji S; Varner MW; Swedlow DB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Nov; 183(5):1049-58. PubMed ID: 11084540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Outcomes of external cephalic version and breech presentation at term, an audit of deliveries at a Sydney tertiary obstetric hospital, 1997-2004.
Nassar N; Roberts CL; Cameron CA; Peat B
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(10):1231-8. PubMed ID: 17068683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [External cephalic version for breech presentation at term: an effective procedure to reduce the caesarean section rate].
Lojacono A; Donarini G; Valcamonico A; Soregaroli M; Frusca T
Minerva Ginecol; 2003 Dec; 55(6):519-24. PubMed ID: 14676741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.
Hankins GD; Clark SM; Munn MB
Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Caesarean birth rates worldwide. A search for determinants.
van Roosmalen J; van der Does CD
Trop Geogr Med; 1995; 47(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 7747325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cesarean delivery.
Dresang LT; Leeman L
Prim Care; 2012 Mar; 39(1):145-65. PubMed ID: 22309587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Breech presentation: evolution of management.
Ghosh MK
J Reprod Med; 2005 Feb; 50(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 15755047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does internal podalic version of the non-vertex second twin still have a place in obstetrics? A Danish national retrospective cohort study.
Jonsdottir F; Henriksen L; Secher NJ; Maaløe N
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Jan; 94(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 25283062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Neonatal mortality for primary cesarean and vaginal births to low-risk women: application of an "intention-to-treat" model.
MacDorman MF; Declercq E; Menacker F; Malloy MH
Birth; 2008 Mar; 35(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 18307481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mode of delivery following external cephalic version and induction of labor at term.
Megory E; Ohel G; Fisher O; Ruach M
Am J Perinatol; 1995 Nov; 12(6):404-6. PubMed ID: 8579650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcomes of term vaginal breech delivery.
Doyle NM; Riggs JW; Ramin SM; Sosa MA; Gilstrap LC
Am J Perinatol; 2005 Aug; 22(6):325-8. PubMed ID: 16118722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pregnancy outcomes by mode of delivery among breech births.
Demirci O; Tuğrul AS; Turgut A; Ceylan S; Eren S
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Feb; 285(2):297-303. PubMed ID: 21735191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Breech presentation.
Eller DP; VanDorsten JP
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Oct; 5(5):664-8. PubMed ID: 8241444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficacy of external cephalic version: a review.
Zhang J; Bowes WA; Fortney JA
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Aug; 82(2):306-12. PubMed ID: 8336883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Dillema about the method of delivery for the fetus in breech presentation].
Vasilj O; Matijević R; Grgić O
Acta Med Croatica; 2007 Apr; 61(2):177-84. PubMed ID: 17585474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Singleton breach presentation planned for vaginal delivery.
Davis VE
Med J Zambia; 1976 Dec-1977 Jan; 10(6):164-8. PubMed ID: 1052107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The continuing effectiveness of active management of first labor, despite a doubling in overall nulliparous cesarean delivery.
Foley ME; Alarab M; Daly L; Keane D; Rath A; O'herlihy C
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Sep; 191(3):891-5. PubMed ID: 15467560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Indications for primary cesarean delivery relative to body mass index.
Kawakita T; Reddy UM; Landy HJ; Iqbal SN; Huang CC; Grantz KL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 215(4):515.e1-9. PubMed ID: 27210064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
