BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

485 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24566091)

  • 1. Insertion site and sealing technique affect residual hearing and tissue formation after cochlear implantation.
    Burghard A; Lenarz T; Kral A; Paasche G
    Hear Res; 2014 Jun; 312():21-7. PubMed ID: 24566091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Delayed low frequency hearing loss caused by cochlear implantation interventions via the round window but not cochleostomy.
    Rowe D; Chambers S; Hampson A; Eastwood H; Campbell L; O'Leary S
    Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():49-57. PubMed ID: 26739790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cochlear implant electrode insertion: in defence of cochleostomy and factors against the round window membrane approach.
    Addams-Williams J; Munaweera L; Coleman B; Shepherd R; Backhouse S
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2011 Aug; 12 Suppl 2():S36-9. PubMed ID: 21917217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of round window and cochleostomy approaches with a prototype hearing preservation electrode.
    Briggs RJ; Tykocinski M; Xu J; Risi F; Svehla M; Cowan R; Stover T; Erfurt P; Lenarz T
    Audiol Neurootol; 2006; 11 Suppl 1():42-8. PubMed ID: 17063010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cochlear implant and inflammation reaction: Safety study of a new steroid-eluting electrode.
    Astolfi L; Simoni E; Giarbini N; Giordano P; Pannella M; Hatzopoulos S; Martini A
    Hear Res; 2016 Jun; 336():44-52. PubMed ID: 27109196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Radiologic Results and Hearing Preservation With a Straight Narrow Electrode via Round Window Versus Cochleostomy Approach at Initial Activation.
    Hassepass F; Aschendorff A; Bulla S; Arndt S; Maier W; Laszig R; Beck R
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jul; 36(6):993-1000. PubMed ID: 25675315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cochleostomy versus round window insertions: influence on functional outcomes in electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system.
    Adunka OF; Dillon MT; Adunka MC; King ER; Pillsbury HC; Buchman CA
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Apr; 35(4):613-8. PubMed ID: 24557034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does cochleostomy location influence electrode trajectory and intracochlear trauma?
    Zhou L; Friedmann DR; Treaba C; Peng R; Roland JT
    Laryngoscope; 2015 Apr; 125(4):966-71. PubMed ID: 25345671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Round window membrane insertion with perimodiolar cochlear implant electrodes.
    Coordes A; Ernst A; Brademann G; Todt I
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Aug; 34(6):1027-32. PubMed ID: 23507991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Combining perimodiolar electrode placement and atraumatic insertion properties in cochlear implantation -- fact or fantasy?
    Adunka OF; Pillsbury HC; Kiefer J
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 May; 126(5):475-82. PubMed ID: 16698696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cochlear implantation via the round window membrane minimizes trauma to cochlear structures: a histologically controlled insertion study.
    Adunka O; Unkelbach MH; Mack M; Hambek M; Gstoettner W; Kiefer J
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2004 Sep; 124(7):807-12. PubMed ID: 15370564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impedance Changes and Fibrous Tissue Growth after Cochlear Implantation Are Correlated and Can Be Reduced Using a Dexamethasone Eluting Electrode.
    Wilk M; Hessler R; Mugridge K; Jolly C; Fehr M; Lenarz T; Scheper V
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0147552. PubMed ID: 26840740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relations between cochlear histopathology and hearing loss in experimental cochlear implantation.
    O'Leary SJ; Monksfield P; Kel G; Connolly T; Souter MA; Chang A; Marovic P; O'Leary JS; Richardson R; Eastwood H
    Hear Res; 2013 Apr; 298():27-35. PubMed ID: 23396095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Atraumatic Scala Tympani Cochleostomy; Resolution of the Dilemma.
    Badr A; Shabana Y; Mokbel K; Elsharabasy A; Ghonim M; Sanna M
    J Int Adv Otol; 2018 Aug; 14(2):190-196. PubMed ID: 30100542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Effect of Round Window Sealants on Delayed Hearing Loss in a Guinea Pig Model of Cochlear Implantation.
    Rowe D; Chambers S; Hampson A; Eastwood H; O'Leary S
    Otol Neurotol; 2016 Sep; 37(8):1024-31. PubMed ID: 27525617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cochleostomy site: implications for electrode placement and hearing preservation.
    Briggs RJ; Tykocinski M; Stidham K; Roberson JB
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Aug; 125(8):870-6. PubMed ID: 16158535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preservation of auditory brainstem response thresholds after cochleostomy and titanium microactuator implantation in the lateral wall of cat scala tympani.
    Lesinski SG; Prewitt J; Bray V; Aravamudhan R; Bermeo Blanco OA; Farmer-Fedor BL; Ward JA
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Apr; 35(4):730-8. PubMed ID: 24622027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The insertion trajectory in cochlear implantation - comparison between two approaches.
    Shapira Y; Sultan AA; Kronenberg J
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2011 Sep; 131(9):958-61. PubMed ID: 21619439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of round window membrane injury and the use of a model electrode application on hearing in rats.
    Koc M; Dalgic A; Ozuer MZ
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2016 Mar; 95(3):E12-5. PubMed ID: 26991223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrode array-eluted dexamethasone protects against electrode insertion trauma induced hearing and hair cell losses, damage to neural elements, increases in impedance and fibrosis: A dose response study.
    Bas E; Bohorquez J; Goncalves S; Perez E; Dinh CT; Garnham C; Hessler R; Eshraghi AA; Van De Water TR
    Hear Res; 2016 Jul; 337():12-24. PubMed ID: 26892906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.