These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24566210)

  • 1. Robotic sacrocolpopexy performance and cumulative summation analysis.
    Myers EM; Geller EJ; Connolly A; Bowling JM; Matthews CA
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(2):83-6. PubMed ID: 24566210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing the learning curve of robotic sacrocolpopexy.
    Linder BJ; Anand M; Weaver AL; Woelk JL; Klingele CJ; Trabuco EC; Occhino JA; Gebhart JB
    Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Feb; 27(2):239-46. PubMed ID: 26294206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Short-term mesh exposure after robotic sacrocolpopexy with and without concomitant hysterectomy.
    Crane AK; Geller EJ; Sullivan S; Robinson BL; Myers EM; Horton C; Matthews CA
    South Med J; 2014 Oct; 107(10):603-6. PubMed ID: 25279861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robotic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse: a review of midterm surgical and quality of life outcomes.
    Barboglio PG; Toler AJ; Triaca V
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 24368487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cumulative summation (CUSUM) charts in the monitoring of hypospadias outcomes: a tool for quality improvement initiative.
    Parikh AM; Park AM; Sumfest J
    J Pediatr Urol; 2014 Apr; 10(2):306-11. PubMed ID: 24290222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Surgical excision of eroded mesh after prior abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
    South MM; Foster RT; Webster GD; Weidner AC; Amundsen CL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Dec; 197(6):615.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18060951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Complications of gynaecological operations. A one-year analysis of a hospital database].
    Møller LM
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2005 Dec; 167(49):4654-9. PubMed ID: 16336858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery?
    Lenihan JP; Kovanda C; Seshadri-Kreaden U
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(5):589-94. PubMed ID: 18722971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
    Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Short- and long-term morbidity and outcomes after robotic surgery for comprehensive endometrial cancer staging.
    Backes FJ; Brudie LA; Farrell MR; Ahmad S; Finkler NJ; Bigsby GE; O'Malley D; Cohn DE; Holloway RW; Fowler JM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Jun; 125(3):546-51. PubMed ID: 22387522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Outcomes of abdominal and minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy: a retrospective cohort study.
    Nosti PA; Umoh Andy U; Kane S; White DE; Harvie HS; Lowenstein L; Gutman RE
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 24368486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality control for intravascular intrauterine transfusion using cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis for the monitoring of individual performance.
    Lindenburg IT; Wolterbeek R; Oepkes D; Klumper FJ; Vandenbussche FP; van Kamp IL
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2011; 29(4):307-14. PubMed ID: 21304232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Symptomatic and anatomic 1-year outcomes after robotic and abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
    Siddiqui NY; Geller EJ; Visco AG
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 May; 206(5):435.e1-5. PubMed ID: 22397900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Outlet constipation 1 year after robotic sacrocolpopexy with and without concomitant posterior repair.
    Crane AK; Geller EJ; Matthews CA
    South Med J; 2013 Jul; 106(7):409-14. PubMed ID: 23820321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-minimization analysis of robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
    Judd JP; Siddiqui NY; Barnett JC; Visco AG; Havrilesky LJ; Wu JM
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(4):493-9. PubMed ID: 20621010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy/sacrocervicopexy repair of pelvic organ prolapse: initial experience.
    Göçmen A; Sanlıkan F; Uçar MG
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Mar; 285(3):683-8. PubMed ID: 21818575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pneumomediastinum after robotic sacrocolpopexy.
    Crawford NM; Pathi SD; Corton MM
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(1):56-8. PubMed ID: 24368491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of the surgical learning curve using the cumulative sum (CUSUM) method.
    Maguire T; Mayne CJ; Terry T; Tincello DG
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2013 Sep; 32(7):964-7. PubMed ID: 23359307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intraoperative and postoperative gastrointestinal complications associated with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.
    Warner WB; Vora S; Alonge A; Welgoss JA; Hurtado EA; von Pechmann WS
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2012; 18(6):321-4. PubMed ID: 23143422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robotic-assisted gynaecological surgery-establishing training criteria; minimizing operative time and blood loss.
    Pitter MC; Anderson P; Blissett A; Pemberton N
    Int J Med Robot; 2008 Jun; 4(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 18382994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.