These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Assessing the learning curve of robotic sacrocolpopexy. Linder BJ; Anand M; Weaver AL; Woelk JL; Klingele CJ; Trabuco EC; Occhino JA; Gebhart JB Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Feb; 27(2):239-46. PubMed ID: 26294206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Short-term mesh exposure after robotic sacrocolpopexy with and without concomitant hysterectomy. Crane AK; Geller EJ; Sullivan S; Robinson BL; Myers EM; Horton C; Matthews CA South Med J; 2014 Oct; 107(10):603-6. PubMed ID: 25279861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robotic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse: a review of midterm surgical and quality of life outcomes. Barboglio PG; Toler AJ; Triaca V Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 24368487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cumulative summation (CUSUM) charts in the monitoring of hypospadias outcomes: a tool for quality improvement initiative. Parikh AM; Park AM; Sumfest J J Pediatr Urol; 2014 Apr; 10(2):306-11. PubMed ID: 24290222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Surgical excision of eroded mesh after prior abdominal sacrocolpopexy. South MM; Foster RT; Webster GD; Weidner AC; Amundsen CL Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Dec; 197(6):615.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18060951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Complications of gynaecological operations. A one-year analysis of a hospital database]. Møller LM Ugeskr Laeger; 2005 Dec; 167(49):4654-9. PubMed ID: 16336858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery? Lenihan JP; Kovanda C; Seshadri-Kreaden U J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(5):589-94. PubMed ID: 18722971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer. Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Short- and long-term morbidity and outcomes after robotic surgery for comprehensive endometrial cancer staging. Backes FJ; Brudie LA; Farrell MR; Ahmad S; Finkler NJ; Bigsby GE; O'Malley D; Cohn DE; Holloway RW; Fowler JM Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Jun; 125(3):546-51. PubMed ID: 22387522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcomes of abdominal and minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy: a retrospective cohort study. Nosti PA; Umoh Andy U; Kane S; White DE; Harvie HS; Lowenstein L; Gutman RE Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 24368486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality control for intravascular intrauterine transfusion using cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis for the monitoring of individual performance. Lindenburg IT; Wolterbeek R; Oepkes D; Klumper FJ; Vandenbussche FP; van Kamp IL Fetal Diagn Ther; 2011; 29(4):307-14. PubMed ID: 21304232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Symptomatic and anatomic 1-year outcomes after robotic and abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Siddiqui NY; Geller EJ; Visco AG Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 May; 206(5):435.e1-5. PubMed ID: 22397900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Outlet constipation 1 year after robotic sacrocolpopexy with and without concomitant posterior repair. Crane AK; Geller EJ; Matthews CA South Med J; 2013 Jul; 106(7):409-14. PubMed ID: 23820321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]