106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24567286)
1. Methyl methacrylate levels in orthopedic surgery: comparison of two conventional vacuum mixing systems.
Jelecevic J; Maidanjuk S; Leithner A; Loewe K; Kuehn KD
Ann Occup Hyg; 2014 May; 58(4):493-500. PubMed ID: 24567286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pre-packed vacuum bone cement mixing systems. A further step in reducing methylmethacrylate exposure in surgery.
Schlegel UJ; Sturm M; Eysel P; Breusch SJ
Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Nov; 54(8):955-61. PubMed ID: 20595195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Airborne Exposure of Methyl Methacrylate During Simulated Total Hip Arthroplasty and Fabrication of Antibiotic Beads.
Speeckaert AL; Brothers JG; Wingert NC; Graham JH; Klena JC
J Arthroplasty; 2015 Aug; 30(8):1464-9. PubMed ID: 25795235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bone Cement Fumes Generated in Laminar Airflow Versus Conventionally Ventilated Operating Rooms: Does the Mixing System Matter?
Jamison MP; Hunt ER; West MC; Chen AF
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2023 Nov; 105(21):1676-1685. PubMed ID: 37639497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Masks for the Reduction of Methyl Methacrylate Vapor Inhalation.
Compton J; Clinger J; Lawler E; Otero J; O'Shaughnessy P
Iowa Orthop J; 2020; 40(1):191-193. PubMed ID: 32754006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficacy of vacuum bone cement mixing systems in reducing methylmethacrylate fume exposure: comparison of 7 different mixing devices and handmixing.
Schlegel UJ; Sturm M; Ewerbeck V; Breusch SJ
Acta Orthop Scand; 2004 Oct; 75(5):559-66. PubMed ID: 15513487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Inhalation study of polymethyl methacrylate following radiologist exposure during percutaneous vertebroplasty.
Amoretti N; Coco L; Nouri Y; Marcy PY; Ianessi A; Amoretti ME; Hauger O
Skeletal Radiol; 2013 Feb; 42(2):203-7. PubMed ID: 22438125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [New PMMA bone cements for vacuum mixing systems].
Schelling K; Heisel C; Schnürer SM; Mau H; Breusch SJ
Orthopade; 2002 Jun; 31(6):556-62. PubMed ID: 12149927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Serum levels of methyl methacrylate following inhalational exposure to polymethylmethacrylate bone cement.
Homlar KC; Sellers MH; Halpern JL; Seeley EH; Holt GE
J Arthroplasty; 2013 Mar; 28(3):406-9. PubMed ID: 23245392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Control of methyl methacrylate during the preparation of orthopedic bone cements.
Ungers LJ; Vendrely TG; Barnes CL
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Apr; 4(4):272-80. PubMed ID: 17365499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of various vacuum mixing systems and bone cements as regards reliability, porosity and bending strength.
Mau H; Schelling K; Heisel C; Wang JS; Breusch SJ
Acta Orthop Scand; 2004 Apr; 75(2):160-72. PubMed ID: 15180231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Vacuum mixing systems for bone cement completion - comparison of different systems].
Horas U; Seidel P; Heiss C; Kilian O; Dingeldein E; Schnettler R
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2002; 140(6):603-10. PubMed ID: 12476381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Emission of air pollutants in removal of bone cement with ultrasound instruments in revision endoprosthetics].
Aldinger PR; Kleine H; Goebel A; Eickmann U; Breusch SJ
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2001 Oct; 46(10):287-9. PubMed ID: 11721584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Gentamicin release from two-solution and powder-liquid poly(methyl methacrylate)-based bone cements by using novel pH method.
Merkhan IK; Hasenwinkel JM; Gilbert JL
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2004 Jun; 69(3):577-83. PubMed ID: 15127405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing REACH Chemical Safety Assessment information with practice-a case-study of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) in floor coating in The Netherlands.
Spee T; Huizer D
Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2017 Oct; 220(7):1190-1194. PubMed ID: 28711304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Research progress on health hazards and occupational protection of prolymethylmethacrylate bone cement in the operating room].
Wu QP; Gan XQ; Pei HY
Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2022 May; 40(5):396-400. PubMed ID: 35680589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Performances of different types of airflow system in operating theatre].
Talon D; Schoenleber T; Bertrand X; Vichard P
Ann Chir; 2006 May; 131(5):316-21. PubMed ID: 16545336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is there any difference between vacuum mixing systems in reducing bone cement porosity?
Wang JS; Toksvig-Larsen S; Müller-Wille P; Franźen H
J Biomed Mater Res; 1996; 33(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 8736030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Monitoring of acid-base status of workers at a methyl methacrylate and polymethyl methacrylate production plant in Bulgaria.
Prakova GR
AIHA J (Fairfax, Va); 2003; 64(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 12570390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The dynamic volume changes of polymerising polymethyl methacrylate bone cement.
Muller SD; Green SM; McCaskie AW
Acta Orthop Scand; 2002 Dec; 73(6):684-7. PubMed ID: 12553519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
