151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24567583)
21. Impact of primary care funding on secondary care utilisation and patient outcomes: a retrospective cross-sectional study of English general practice.
L'Esperance V; Sutton M; Schofield P; Round T; Malik U; White P; Ashworth M
Br J Gen Pract; 2017 Nov; 67(664):e792-e799. PubMed ID: 28947619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Exempting dissenting patients from pay for performance schemes: retrospective analysis of exception reporting in the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework.
Doran T; Kontopantelis E; Fullwood C; Lester H; Valderas JM; Campbell S
BMJ; 2012 Apr; 344():e2405. PubMed ID: 22511209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Combining QOF data with the care bundle approach may provide a more meaningful measure of quality in general practice.
de Wet C; McKay J; Bowie P
BMC Health Serv Res; 2012 Oct; 12():351. PubMed ID: 23043262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Workload and reward in the Quality and Outcomes Framework of the 2004 general practice contract.
Guthrie B; McLean G; Sutton M
Br J Gen Pract; 2006 Nov; 56(532):836-41. PubMed ID: 17132350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Long term condition morbidity in English general practice: a cross-sectional study using three composite morbidity measures.
Weston C; Gilkes A; Durbaba S; Schofield P; White P; Ashworth M
BMC Fam Pract; 2016 Nov; 17(1):166. PubMed ID: 27894265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The impact of the Quality and Outcomes Framework on practice organisation and service delivery: summary of evidence from two qualitative studies.
Checkland K; Harrison S
Qual Prim Care; 2010; 18(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 20529476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The equity dimension in evaluations of the quality and outcomes framework: a systematic review.
Boeckxstaens P; Smedt DD; Maeseneer JD; Annemans L; Willems S
BMC Health Serv Res; 2011 Aug; 11():209. PubMed ID: 21880136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The Quality and Outcomes Framework: Body commodification in UK general practice.
Norman AH; Russell AJ; Merli C
Soc Sci Med; 2016 Dec; 170():77-86. PubMed ID: 27764655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The impact of pay for performance on the control of blood pressure in people with chronic kidney disease stage 3-5.
Karunaratne K; Stevens P; Irving J; Hobbs H; Kilbride H; Kingston R; Farmer C
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2013 Aug; 28(8):2107-16. PubMed ID: 23658247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effects of payment for performance in primary care: qualitative interview study.
Maisey S; Steel N; Marsh R; Gillam S; Fleetcroft R; Howe A
J Health Serv Res Policy; 2008 Jul; 13(3):133-9. PubMed ID: 18573761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Practice list size, workforce composition and performance in English general practice: a latent profile analysis.
Kayira AB; Painter H; Mathur R; Ford J
BMC Prim Care; 2024 Jun; 25(1):207. PubMed ID: 38862906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Investigating the relationship between quality of primary care and premature mortality in England: a spatial whole-population study.
Kontopantelis E; Springate DA; Ashworth M; Webb RT; Buchan IE; Doran T
BMJ; 2015 Mar; 350():h904. PubMed ID: 25733592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Quality of clinical primary care and targeted incentive payments: an observational study.
Steel N; Maisey S; Clark A; Fleetcroft R; Howe A
Br J Gen Pract; 2007 Jun; 57(539):449-54. PubMed ID: 17550669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Funding for general practice in the next decade: life after QOF.
Ashworth M; Gulliford M
Br J Gen Pract; 2017 Jan; 67(654):4-5. PubMed ID: 28034924
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Practice size, caseload, deprivation and quality of care of patients with coronary heart disease, hypertension and stroke in primary care: national cross-sectional study.
Saxena S; Car J; Eldred D; Soljak M; Majeed A
BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Jun; 7():96. PubMed ID: 17597518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. "Mind the gap!" Evaluation of the performance gap attributable to exception reporting and target thresholds in the new GMS contract: National database analysis.
Fleetcroft R; Steel N; Cookson R; Howe A
BMC Health Serv Res; 2008 Jun; 8():131. PubMed ID: 18559086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Incentive payments are not related to expected health gain in the pay for performance scheme for UK primary care: cross-sectional analysis.
Fleetcroft R; Steel N; Cookson R; Walker S; Howe A
BMC Health Serv Res; 2012 Apr; 12():94. PubMed ID: 22507660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Rationale for the new GP deprivation payment scheme in England: effects of moving from electoral ward to enumeration district underprivileged area scores.
Bajekal M; Alves B; Jarman B; Hurwitz B
Br J Gen Pract; 2001 Jun; 51(467):451-5. PubMed ID: 11407049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. 'Just another incentive scheme': a qualitative interview study of a local pay-for-performance scheme for primary care.
Hackett J; Glidewell L; West R; Carder P; Doran T; Foy R
BMC Fam Pract; 2014 Oct; 15():168. PubMed ID: 25344735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Developing performance indicators for primary care: Walsall's experience.
Sahota N; Hood A; Shankar A; Watt B; Ramaiah S
Br J Gen Pract; 2008 Dec; 58(557):856-61. PubMed ID: 19068159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
