These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24567727)

  • 1. Vision affects tactile target and distractor processing even when space is task-irrelevant.
    Wesslein AK; Spence C; Frings C
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():84. PubMed ID: 24567727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. When vision influences the invisible distractor: tactile response compatibility effects require vision.
    Wesslein AK; Spence C; Frings C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Apr; 40(2):763-74. PubMed ID: 24245501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Response interference in touch, vision, and crossmodally: beyond the spatial dimension.
    Mast F; Frings C; Spence C
    Exp Brain Res; 2014 Jul; 232(7):2325-36. PubMed ID: 24728130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multisensory distractor processing is modulated by spatial attention.
    Merz S; Jensen A; Spence C; Frings C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1375-1388. PubMed ID: 31343245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. You can't ignore what you can't separate: the effect of visually induced target-distractor separation on tactile selection.
    Wesslein AK; Spence C; Frings C
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Jun; 22(3):728-36. PubMed ID: 25316048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Task demands affect spatial reference frame weighting during tactile localization in sighted and congenitally blind adults.
    Schubert JTW; Badde S; Röder B; Heed T
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(12):e0189067. PubMed ID: 29228023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Vision and touch in ageing: crossmodal selective attention and visuotactile spatial interactions.
    Poliakoff E; Ashworth S; Lowe C; Spence C
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(4):507-17. PubMed ID: 16098997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An ERP investigation on visuotactile interactions in peripersonal and extrapersonal space: evidence for the spatial rule.
    Sambo CF; Forster B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1550-9. PubMed ID: 18767919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Expected but omitted stimuli affect crossmodal interaction.
    Costantini M; Migliorati D; Donno B; Sirota M; Ferri F
    Cognition; 2018 Feb; 171():52-64. PubMed ID: 29107888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interference of irrelevant information in multisensory selection depends on attentional set.
    Jensen A; Merz S; Spence C; Frings C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jun; 82(3):1176-1195. PubMed ID: 31444699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interactions of different body parts in peripersonal space: how vision of the foot influences tactile perception at the hand.
    Schicke T; Bauer F; Röder B
    Exp Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 192(4):703-15. PubMed ID: 18841353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing the effect of visual and tactile distractors on the perception of auditory apparent motion.
    Sanabria D; Soto-Faraco S; Spence C
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Oct; 166(3-4):548-58. PubMed ID: 16132965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multisensory top-down sets: Evidence for contingent crossmodal capture.
    Mast F; Frings C; Spence C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Aug; 77(6):1970-85. PubMed ID: 25944449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. When far is near: ERP correlates of crossmodal spatial interactions between tactile and mirror-reflected visual stimuli.
    Sambo CF; Forster B
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 Aug; 500(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 21683122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Overt spatial attention modulates multisensory selection.
    Jensen A; Merz S; Spence C; Frings C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Feb; 45(2):174-188. PubMed ID: 30589358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The development of visuotactile congruency effects for sequences of events.
    O'Dowd A; Cooney SM; Sorgini F; O' Rourke E; Reilly RB; Newell FN; Hirst RJ
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2021 Jul; 207():105094. PubMed ID: 33714049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Crossmodal learning of target-context associations: When would tactile context predict visual search?
    Chen S; Shi Z; Zang X; Zhu X; Assumpção L; Müller HJ; Geyer T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1682-1694. PubMed ID: 31845105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multisensory Interference in Early Deaf Adults.
    Heimler B; Baruffaldi F; Bonmassar C; Venturini M; Pavani F
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2017 Oct; 22(4):422-433. PubMed ID: 28961871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Crossmodal change blindness between vision and touch.
    Auvray M; Gallace A; Tan HZ; Spence C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Oct; 126(2):79-97. PubMed ID: 17187750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of gaze direction on crossmodal modulation of visual ERPS by endogenous tactile spatial attention.
    Macaluso E; Driver J; van Velzen J; Eimer M
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 May; 23(2-3):406-17. PubMed ID: 15820647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.