These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24568583)

  • 1. Adapting to test structure: letting testing teach what to learn.
    Garcia-Marques L; Nunes LD; Marques P; Carneiro P; Weinstein Y
    Memory; 2015; 23(3):365-80. PubMed ID: 24568583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The dual effect of context on memory of related and unrelated themes: discrimination at encoding and cue at retrieval.
    Levy-Gigi E; Vakil E
    Memory; 2012; 20(7):728-41. PubMed ID: 22809325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reward eliminates retrieval-induced forgetting.
    Imai H; Kim D; Sasaki Y; Watanabe T
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Dec; 111(48):17326-9. PubMed ID: 25404297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can patients with Alzheimer's disease learn a category implicitly?
    Bozoki A; Grossman M; Smith EE
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(5):816-27. PubMed ID: 16229868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impaired implicit memory for gist information in amnesia.
    Verfaellie M; Page K; Orlando F; Schacter DL
    Neuropsychology; 2005 Nov; 19(6):760-9. PubMed ID: 16351351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The development of category-based induction: reexamining conclusions from the induction then recognition (ITR) paradigm.
    Hayes BK; McKinnon R; Sweller N
    Dev Psychol; 2008 Sep; 44(5):1430-41. PubMed ID: 18793074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An item gains and losses analysis of false memories suggests critical items receive more item-specific processing than list items.
    Burns DJ; Martens NJ; Bertoni AA; Sweeney EJ; Lividini MD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):277-89. PubMed ID: 16569146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. When does memory monitoring succeed versus fail? Comparing item-specific and relational encoding in the DRM paradigm.
    Huff MJ; Bodner GE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1246-56. PubMed ID: 23356241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relational and item-specific information: trade-off and redundancy.
    Engelkamp J; Biegelmann U; McDaniel MA
    Memory; 1998 May; 6(3):307-33. PubMed ID: 9709445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. ERP correlates of intentional forgetting.
    Mecklinger A; Parra M; Waldhauser GT
    Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1255():132-47. PubMed ID: 19103178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Conceptual priming and familiarity: different expressions of memory during recognition testing with distinct neurophysiological correlates.
    Voss JL; Lucas HD; Paller KA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Nov; 22(11):2638-51. PubMed ID: 19702474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retrieval during learning facilitates subsequent memory encoding.
    Pastötter B; Schicker S; Niedernhuber J; Bäuml KH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):287-97. PubMed ID: 21171804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Discontinuous categories affect information-integration but not rule-based category learning.
    Maddox WT; Filoteo JV; Lauritzen JS; Connally E; Hejl KD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Jul; 31(4):654-69. PubMed ID: 16060771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Categorization and memory retrieval by three-month-olds.
    Hayne H; Rovee-Collier C; Perris EE
    Child Dev; 1987 Jun; 58(3):750-67. PubMed ID: 3608647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How does creating a concept map affect item-specific encoding?
    Grimaldi PJ; Poston L; Karpicke JD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Jul; 41(4):1049-61. PubMed ID: 25528090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distinctive items are salient during encoding: delayed judgements of learning predict the isolation effect.
    Geraci L; Manzano I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jan; 63(1):50-64. PubMed ID: 19370485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fact learning: how information accuracy, delay, and repeated testing change retention and retrieval experience.
    Barber SJ; Rajaram S; Marsh EJ
    Memory; 2008 Nov; 16(8):934-46. PubMed ID: 18949663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The picture superiority effect in conceptual implicit memory: a conceptual distinctiveness hypothesis.
    Hamilton M; Geraci L
    Am J Psychol; 2006; 119(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 16550852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing the inhibitory account of retrieval-induced forgetting with implicit-memory tests.
    Perfect TJ; Moulin CJ; Conway MA; Perry E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Nov; 28(6):1111-9. PubMed ID: 12450336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adaptive memory: identifying the proximate roots of the survival processing advantage.
    Otgaar H; Jelicic M; Smeets T
    J Psychol; 2015; 149(3-4):339-55. PubMed ID: 25901634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.