These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24569746)

  • 1. Structured electronic health records.
    Bjugn R; Casati B; Haugland HK
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2014 Feb; 134(4):431-3. PubMed ID: 24569746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Structured electronic template for histopathology reports on colorectal carcinomas: a joint project by the Cancer Registry of Norway and the Norwegian Society for Pathology.
    Bjugn R; Casati B; Norstein J
    Hum Pathol; 2008 Mar; 39(3):359-67. PubMed ID: 18187180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Template reporting matters--a nationwide study on histopathology reporting on colorectal carcinoma resections.
    Haugland HK; Casati B; Dørum LM; Bjugn R
    Hum Pathol; 2011 Jan; 42(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 20869747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cancer biomarkers: the role of structured data reporting.
    Simpson RW; Berman MA; Foulis PR; Divaris DX; Birdsong GG; Mirza J; Moldwin R; Spencer S; Srigley JR; Fitzgibbons PL
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2015 May; 139(5):587-93. PubMed ID: 25275812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Standardized synoptic cancer pathology reporting: a population-based approach.
    Srigley JR; McGowan T; Maclean A; Raby M; Ross J; Kramer S; Sawka C
    J Surg Oncol; 2009 Jun; 99(8):517-24. PubMed ID: 19466743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electronic capture and communication of synoptic cancer data elements from pathology reports: results of the Reporting Pathology Protocols 2 (RPP2) project.
    Hassell L; Aldinger W; Moody C; Winters S; Gerlach K; Schwenn M; Perriello D
    J Registry Manag; 2009; 36(4):117-24; quiz 163-5. PubMed ID: 20795553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [SAMDATA--hospital statistics without quality assurance].
    Jørgensen S; Kindseth O; Pedersen PB
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1992 Mar; 112(7):928. PubMed ID: 1557771
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [SAMDATA--hospital statistics without quality assurance].
    Svennevig JL
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1992 Feb; 112(5):679-80. PubMed ID: 1557747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Local and national electronic databases in Norway demonstrate a varying degree of validity.
    Lofthus CM; Cappelen I; Osnes EK; Falch JA; Kristiansen IS; Medhus AW; Nordsletten L; Meyer HE
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Mar; 58(3):280-5. PubMed ID: 15718117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [SAMDATA--hospital statistics without quality assurance].
    Lund E
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1992 Jan; 112(1):71-2. PubMed ID: 1553651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Standardized synoptic cancer pathology reports - so what and who cares? A population-based satisfaction survey of 970 pathologists, surgeons, and oncologists.
    Lankshear S; Srigley J; McGowan T; Yurcan M; Sawka C
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Nov; 137(11):1599-602. PubMed ID: 23432456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Standardization, innovation and deployment of electronic referral software in Norway.
    Heimly V
    J Telemed Telecare; 2008; 14(7):359-62. PubMed ID: 18852317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The value proposition of structured reporting in interventional radiology.
    Durack JC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Oct; 203(4):734-8. PubMed ID: 25247937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The use of databases and registries to enhance colonoscopy quality.
    Logan JR; Lieberman DA
    Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2010 Oct; 20(4):717-34. PubMed ID: 20889074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Central registries in health care. Are they reliable?].
    Carlsson P
    Lakartidningen; 1994 Feb; 91(7):582, 587. PubMed ID: 8114593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The registration bog--a consequence of old-fashioned medical record-keeping].
    Morfeldt L
    Lakartidningen; 2009 Nov 4-12; 106(45):2949-50. PubMed ID: 19998814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Electronic medical records should be structured].
    Krüger K
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2007 Aug; 127(16):2090-3. PubMed ID: 17717573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. ["DIabetes Versorgungs-Evaluation" (DIVE)--a national quality assurance initiative at physicians providing care for patients with diabetes].
    Danne T; Kaltheuner M; Koch A; Ernst S; Rathmann W; Rüssmann HJ; Bramlage P;
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2013 May; 138(18):934-9. PubMed ID: 23613371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [IT systems for clinical databases--status and perspectives].
    Vingtoft S; Jensen LP; Madsen I; Nielsen PH; Kverneland A; Kjaergaard J
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2002 Sep; 164(38):4398-405. PubMed ID: 12362730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Early experiences in using computerized patient record data for monitoring charting compliance, supporting quality initiatives and assisting with accurate charging at Allina Hospitals & Clinics.
    Collins B; Wagner M
    Int J Med Inform; 2005 Dec; 74(11-12):917-25. PubMed ID: 16169768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.