BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24569746)

  • 21. Pathologists as stewards of laboratory information.
    Henricks WH; Wilkerson ML; Castellani WJ; Whitsitt MS; Sinard JH
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2015 Mar; 139(3):332-7. PubMed ID: 25724030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Factors influencing the quality of medical documentation when a paper-based medical records system is replaced with an electronic medical records system: an Iranian case study.
    Pourasghar F; Malekafzali H; Koch S; Fors U
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(4):445-51. PubMed ID: 18828939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Requirements and standards facilitating quality improvement for reporting systems in gastrointestinal endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement.
    Bretthauer M; Aabakken L; Dekker E; Kaminski MF; Rösch T; Hultcrantz R; Suchanek S; Jover R; Kuipers EJ; Bisschops R; Spada C; Valori R; Domagk D; Rees C; Rutter MD;
    Endoscopy; 2016 Mar; 48(3):291-4. PubMed ID: 26841269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Leveraging state cancer registries to measure and improve the quality of cancer care: a potential strategy for California and beyond.
    Hiatt RA; Tai CG; Blayney DW; Deapen D; Hogarth M; Kizer KW; Lipscomb J; Malin J; Phillips SK; Santa J; Schrag D
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2015 Mar; 107(5):. PubMed ID: 25766400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Security requirements for electronic patients records: the Norwegian view.
    Iversen KR
    Int J Biomed Comput; 1994 Feb; 35 Suppl():51-6. PubMed ID: 8188422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Big gaps in documentation of end-of-life care. Incomplete medical records reported to the Swedish Registry of Palliative Care].
    Gholiha A; Fransson G; Fürst CJ; Heedman PA; Lundström S; Axelsson B
    Lakartidningen; 2011 Apr 20-May 3; 108(16-17):918-21. PubMed ID: 21644380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Commentary: Electronic health records for comparative effectiveness research.
    Glasgow RE
    Med Care; 2012 Jul; 50 Suppl():S19-20. PubMed ID: 22692253
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The challenge of measuring quality of care from the electronic health record.
    Roth CP; Lim YW; Pevnick JM; Asch SM; McGlynn EA
    Am J Med Qual; 2009; 24(5):385-94. PubMed ID: 19482968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A study of user requests regarding the fully electronic health record system at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital: challenges for future electronic health record systems.
    Yoo S; Kim S; Lee S; Lee KH; Baek RM; Hwang H
    Int J Med Inform; 2013 May; 82(5):387-97. PubMed ID: 22959193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Barriers for the use of traditional clinical data].
    Neermark S; Bay-Nielsen M
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2013 Oct; 175(43):2546-9. PubMed ID: 24629149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Data respect--data discipline--data understanding].
    Harvei S; Tynes T
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1991 Jun; 111(15):1877-8. PubMed ID: 1853325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Nursing care needs and the electronic patient record].
    Müller-Staub M
    Pflege; 2008 Aug; 21(4):211-4. PubMed ID: 18780477
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Use of electronic health records in U.S. hospitals.
    Jha AK; DesRoches CM; Campbell EG; Donelan K; Rao SR; Ferris TG; Shields A; Rosenbaum S; Blumenthal D
    N Engl J Med; 2009 Apr; 360(16):1628-38. PubMed ID: 19321858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [An illusion that the electronically stored prose of today benefits the patient safety].
    Tiselius HG
    Lakartidningen; 2009 Nov 18-24; 106(47):3181. PubMed ID: 20077646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Re: Structured electronic health records].
    Chen Y; Reed W; Hanssen TA
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2014 May; 134(10):1019-20. PubMed ID: 24865708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Precisions on utilization of electronic medical records].
    Nau JY
    Rev Med Suisse; 2015 Mar; 11(467):746-7. PubMed ID: 26027212
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The concern for accurate, quality registry data.
    Benjamin CD; Watkins S
    J AHIMA; 1992 Mar; 63(3):91-4. PubMed ID: 10118261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of a mandatory quality assurance data capture in anesthesia: a secure electronic system to capture quality assurance information linked to an automated anesthesia record.
    Peterfreund RA; Driscoll WD; Walsh JL; Subramanian A; Anupama S; Weaver M; Morris T; Arnholz S; Zheng H; Pierce ET; Spring SF
    Anesth Analg; 2011 May; 112(5):1218-25. PubMed ID: 21415434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Meeting EHR security requirements: SeAAS approach.
    Katt B; Trojer T; Breu R; Schabetsberger T; Wozak F
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2010; 155():85-91. PubMed ID: 20543314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Documentation and coding of ED patient encounters: an evaluation of the accuracy of an electronic medical record.
    Silfen E
    Am J Emerg Med; 2006 Oct; 24(6):664-78. PubMed ID: 16984834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.