BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

771 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24569795)

  • 41. Cochlear implantation and hearing preservation: Results in 21 consecutively operated patients using the round window approach.
    Erixon E; Köbler S; Rask-Andersen H
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Sep; 132(9):923-31. PubMed ID: 22667762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Evaluation of the short hybrid electrode in human temporal bones.
    Roland JT; Zeitler DM; Jethanamest D; Huang TC
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Jun; 29(4):482-8. PubMed ID: 18317395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. An overview of cochlear implant electrode array designs.
    Dhanasingh A; Jolly C
    Hear Res; 2017 Dec; 356():93-103. PubMed ID: 29102129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Systematic review: Radiological and histological evidence of cochlear implant insertion trauma in adult patients.
    Hoskison E; Mitchell S; Coulson C
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2017 Jul; 18(4):192-197. PubMed ID: 28534710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The influence of cochlear morphology on the final electrode array position.
    Ketterer MC; Aschendorff A; Arndt S; Hassepass F; Wesarg T; Laszig R; Beck R
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Feb; 275(2):385-394. PubMed ID: 29242990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Cochlear pathology following reimplantation of a multichannel scala tympani electrode array in the macaque.
    Shepherd RK; Clark GM; Xu SA; Pyman BC
    Am J Otol; 1995 Mar; 16(2):186-99. PubMed ID: 8572119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Advanced bionics thin lateral and Helix II electrodes: a temporal bone study.
    Wright CG; Roland PS; Kuzma J
    Laryngoscope; 2005 Nov; 115(11):2041-5. PubMed ID: 16319621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Lamb Temporal Bone as a Surgical Training Model of Round Window Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion.
    Mantokoudis G; Huth ME; Weisstanner C; Friedrich HM; Nauer C; Candreia C; Caversaccio MD; Senn P
    Otol Neurotol; 2016 Jan; 37(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 26649606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Evaluation of a new mid-scala cochlear implant electrode using microcomputed tomography.
    Frisch CD; Carlson ML; Lane JI; Driscoll CL
    Laryngoscope; 2015 Dec; 125(12):2778-83. PubMed ID: 25946683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Midmodiolar reconstruction as a valuable tool to determine the exact position of the cochlear implant electrode array.
    Lecerf P; Bakhos D; Cottier JP; Lescanne E; Trijolet JP; Robier A
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Sep; 32(7):1075-81. PubMed ID: 21817940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Development of Insertion Models Predicting Cochlear Implant Electrode Position.
    van der Marel KS; Briaire JJ; Wolterbeek R; Verbist BM; Frijns JH
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):473-82. PubMed ID: 26760199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The rational for a mid-scala electrode array.
    Boyle PJ
    Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis; 2016 Jun; 133 Suppl 1():S61-2. PubMed ID: 27246747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Cochlear implantation with pericanal electrode insertion technique].
    Cui T; Jiang H; Chen X; Feng G; Zhang Z; Li F; Zhao C; Gao Z; Han D; Yang S; Dai P; Li J; Xi X; Ma X; Dong Y; Yu P
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 May; 25(10):457-9. PubMed ID: 21809558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Evaluation of insertion quality of a slim perimodiolar electrode array.
    Beck R; Aschendorff A; Arndt S; Hildenbrand T; Rauch AK; Ketterer MC
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Mar; 281(3):1215-1220. PubMed ID: 37773530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Scalar Translocation Comparison Between Lateral Wall and Perimodiolar Cochlear Implant Arrays - A Meta-Analysis.
    Jwair S; Prins A; Wegner I; Stokroos RJ; Versnel H; Thomeer HGXM
    Laryngoscope; 2021 Jun; 131(6):1358-1368. PubMed ID: 33159469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. In vivo measurements of the insertion depth of cochlear implant arrays using flat-panel volume computed tomography.
    Trieger A; Schulze A; Schneider M; Zahnert T; Mürbe D
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Jan; 32(1):152-7. PubMed ID: 20962701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Insertion forces and intracochlear trauma in temporal bone specimens implanted with a straight atraumatic electrode array.
    Mirsalehi M; Rau TS; Harbach L; Hügl S; Mohebbi S; Lenarz T; Majdani O
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 May; 274(5):2131-2140. PubMed ID: 28238160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. In vitro modifications of the scala tympani environment and the cochlear implant array surface.
    Kontorinis G; Scheper V; Wissel K; Stöver T; Lenarz T; Paasche G
    Laryngoscope; 2012 Sep; 122(9):2057-63. PubMed ID: 22648595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Insertion depth angles of cochlear implant arrays with varying length: a temporal bone study.
    Franke-Trieger A; Jolly C; Darbinjan A; Zahnert T; Mürbe D
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Jan; 35(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 24335932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Is electrode-modiolus distance a prognostic factor for hearing performances after cochlear implant surgery?
    Esquia Medina GN; Borel S; Nguyen Y; Ambert-Dahan E; Ferrary E; Sterkers O; Grayeli AB
    Audiol Neurootol; 2013; 18(6):406-13. PubMed ID: 24157488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 39.