These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
692 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24570979)
1. Different implant impression techniques for edentulous patients treated with CAD/CAM complete-arch prostheses: a randomised controlled trial reporting data at 3 year post-loading. Pozzi A; Tallarico M; Mangani F; Barlattani A Eur J Oral Implantol; 2013; 6(4):325-40. PubMed ID: 24570979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An in vitro comparison of the accuracy of implant impressions with coded healing abutments and different implant angulations. Al-Abdullah K; Zandparsa R; Finkelman M; Hirayama H J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):90-100. PubMed ID: 23929370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of the accuracy of polyether, polyvinyl siloxane, and plaster impressions for long-span implant-supported prostheses. Hoods-Moonsammy VJ; Owen P; Howes DG Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(5):433-8. PubMed ID: 25191885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Digital versus conventional implant impressions for edentulous patients: accuracy outcomes. Papaspyridakos P; Gallucci GO; Chen CJ; Hanssen S; Naert I; Vandenberghe B Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Apr; 27(4):465-72. PubMed ID: 25682892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of implant casts generated with splinted and non-splinted impression techniques for edentulous patients: an optical scanning study. Papaspyridakos P; Benic GI; Hogsett VL; White GS; Lal K; Gallucci GO Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jun; 23(6):676-681. PubMed ID: 21631595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of splinted and nonsplinted impression techniques on the accuracy of fit of fixed implant prostheses in edentulous patients: a comparative study. Papaspyridakos P; Lal K; White GS; Weber HP; Gallucci GO Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1267-72. PubMed ID: 22167432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of feldspathic porcelain layering on the marginal fit of zirconia and titanium complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks. Yilmaz B; Alshahrani FA; Kale E; Johnston WM J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 29426786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Retrievable metal ceramic implant-supported fixed prostheses with milled titanium frameworks and all-ceramic crowns: retrospective clinical study with up to 10 years of follow-up. Maló P; de Araújo Nobre M; Borges J; Almeida R J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):256-64. PubMed ID: 22339902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of impression techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis. Del'Acqua MA; Chávez AM; Compagnoni MA; Molo Fde A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):715-21. PubMed ID: 20657866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The influence of verification jig on framework fit for nonsegmented fixed implant-supported complete denture. Ercoli C; Geminiani A; Feng C; Lee H Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e188-95. PubMed ID: 22176765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Digital evaluation of the accuracy of impression techniques and materials in angulated implants. Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S; Ozan O; Ozcelik TB; Yagiz A J Dent; 2014 Dec; 42(12):1551-9. PubMed ID: 25446736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Immediate occluding definitive partial fixed prosthesis versus non-occluding provisional restorations - 4-month post-loading results from a pragmatic multicenter randomised controlled trial. Heinemann F; Grufferty B; Papavasiliou G; Dominiak M; García JJ; Trullenque-Eriksson A; Esposito M Eur J Oral Implantol; 2016; 9(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 27022636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Do repeated changes of abutments have any influence on the stability of peri-implant tissues? Four-month post-loading preliminary results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Luongo G; Bressan E; Grusovin MG; d'Avenia F; Neumann K; Sbricoli L; Esposito M Eur J Oral Implantol; 2015; 8(2):129-40. PubMed ID: 26021224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ratios of Cantilever Lengths and Anterior-Posterior Spreads of Definitive Hybrid Full-Arch, Screw-Retained Prostheses: Results of a Clinical Study. Drago C J Prosthodont; 2018 Jun; 27(5):402-408. PubMed ID: 27416302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of accuracy of casts of multiple internal connection implant prosthesis obtained from different impression materials and techniques: an in vitro study. Pujari M; Garg P; Prithviraj DR J Oral Implantol; 2014 Apr; 40(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 24456531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fit of implant-supported fixed prostheses fabricated on master casts made from a dental stone and a dental plaster. Wise M J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Nov; 86(5):532-8. PubMed ID: 11725282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Full-arch implant fixed prostheses: a comparative study on the effect of connection type and impression technique on accuracy of fit. Papaspyridakos P; Hirayama H; Chen CJ; Ho CH; Chronopoulos V; Weber HP Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Sep; 27(9):1099-105. PubMed ID: 26374268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology. Batson ER; Cooper LF; Duqum I; Mendonça G J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):770-7. PubMed ID: 24980739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of splinting in accuracy of two implant impression techniques. de Avila ED; de Matos Moraes F; Castanharo SM; Del'Acqua MA; de Assis Mollo F J Oral Implantol; 2014 Dec; 40(6):633-9. PubMed ID: 25506658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical reliability of CAD/CAM cross-arch zirconia bridges on immediately loaded implants placed with computer-assisted/template-guided surgery: a retrospective study with a follow-up between 3 and 5 years. Pozzi A; Holst S; Fabbri G; Tallarico M Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Jan; 17 Suppl 1():e86-96. PubMed ID: 23910539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]