These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

461 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24571129)

  • 1. Stratified doubly robust estimators for the average causal effect.
    Hattori S; Henmi M
    Biometrics; 2014 Jun; 70(2):270-7. PubMed ID: 24571129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Model misspecification and robustness in causal inference: comparing matching with doubly robust estimation.
    Waernbaum I
    Stat Med; 2012 Jul; 31(15):1572-81. PubMed ID: 22359267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving causal inference with a doubly robust estimator that combines propensity score stratification and weighting.
    Linden A
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2017 Aug; 23(4):697-702. PubMed ID: 28116816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Doubly robust estimators of causal exposure effects with missing data in the outcome, exposure or a confounder.
    Williamson EJ; Forbes A; Wolfe R
    Stat Med; 2012 Dec; 31(30):4382-400. PubMed ID: 23086504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Causal inference on quantiles with an obstetric application.
    Zhang Z; Chen Z; Troendle JF; Zhang J
    Biometrics; 2012 Sep; 68(3):697-706. PubMed ID: 22150612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of outcome model misspecification on regression and doubly-robust inverse probability weighting to estimate causal effect.
    Lefebvre G; Gustafson P
    Int J Biostat; 2010; 6(2):Article 15. PubMed ID: 21969999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Model misspecification and bias for inverse probability weighting estimators of average causal effects.
    Waernbaum I; Pazzagli L
    Biom J; 2023 Feb; 65(2):e2100118. PubMed ID: 36045099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Propensity scores based methods for estimating average treatment effect and average treatment effect among treated: A comparative study.
    Abdia Y; Kulasekera KB; Datta S; Boakye M; Kong M
    Biom J; 2017 Sep; 59(5):967-985. PubMed ID: 28436047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Data-Adaptive Bias-Reduced Doubly Robust Estimation.
    Vermeulen K; Vansteelandt S
    Int J Biostat; 2016 May; 12(1):253-82. PubMed ID: 27227724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimators and confidence intervals for the marginal odds ratio using logistic regression and propensity score stratification.
    Stampf S; Graf E; Schmoor C; Schumacher M
    Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):760-9. PubMed ID: 20213703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Machine learning outcome regression improves doubly robust estimation of average causal effects.
    Choi BY; Wang CP; Gelfond J
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2020 Sep; 29(9):1120-1133. PubMed ID: 32716126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Propensity weighting plus adjustment in proportional hazards model is not doubly robust.
    Gabriel EE; Sachs MC; Waernbaum I; Goetghebeur E; Blanche PF; Vansteelandt S; Sjölander A; Scheike T
    Biometrics; 2024 Jul; 80(3):. PubMed ID: 39036984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Covariate selection with group lasso and doubly robust estimation of causal effects.
    Koch B; Vock DM; Wolfson J
    Biometrics; 2018 Mar; 74(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 28636276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Doubly robust estimation of causal effects.
    Funk MJ; Westreich D; Wiesen C; Stürmer T; Brookhart MA; Davidian M
    Am J Epidemiol; 2011 Apr; 173(7):761-7. PubMed ID: 21385832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Double Robust Efficient Estimators of Longitudinal Treatment Effects: Comparative Performance in Simulations and a Case Study.
    Tran L; Yiannoutsos C; Wools-Kaloustian K; Siika A; van der Laan M; Petersen M
    Int J Biostat; 2019 Feb; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 30811344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statistical inference for data-adaptive doubly robust estimators with survival outcomes.
    Díaz I
    Stat Med; 2019 Jul; 38(15):2735-2748. PubMed ID: 30950107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Causal inference with a quantitative exposure.
    Zhang Z; Zhou J; Cao W; Zhang J
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Feb; 25(1):315-35. PubMed ID: 22729475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Subclassification estimation of the weighted average treatment effect.
    Choi BY
    Biom J; 2021 Dec; 63(8):1706-1728. PubMed ID: 34270815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimating causal effects for multivalued treatments: a comparison of approaches.
    Linden A; Uysal SD; Ryan A; Adams JL
    Stat Med; 2016 Feb; 35(4):534-52. PubMed ID: 26482211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inverse probability of treatment weighting with generalized linear outcome models for doubly robust estimation.
    Gabriel EE; Sachs MC; Martinussen T; Waernbaum I; Goetghebeur E; Vansteelandt S; Sjölander A
    Stat Med; 2024 Feb; 43(3):534-547. PubMed ID: 38096856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.