165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24571185)
1. Simple benchmark for complex dose finding studies.
Cheung YK
Biometrics; 2014 Jun; 70(2):389-97. PubMed ID: 24571185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Phase I/II dose-finding design for molecularly targeted agent: Plateau determination using adaptive randomization.
Riviere MK; Yuan Y; Jourdan JH; Dubois F; Zohar S
Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Feb; 27(2):466-479. PubMed ID: 26988926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Continual reassessment method with multiple toxicity constraints.
Lee SM; Cheng B; Cheung YK
Biostatistics; 2011 Apr; 12(2):386-98. PubMed ID: 20876664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. TITE-BOIN-ET: Time-to-event Bayesian optimal interval design to accelerate dose-finding based on both efficacy and toxicity outcomes.
Takeda K; Morita S; Taguri M
Pharm Stat; 2020 May; 19(3):335-349. PubMed ID: 31829517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A benchmark for dose finding studies with continuous outcomes.
Mozgunov P; Jaki T; Paoletti X
Biostatistics; 2020 Apr; 21(2):189-201. PubMed ID: 30165594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluating the performance of copula models in phase I-II clinical trials under model misspecification.
Cunanan K; Koopmeiners JS
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Apr; 14():51. PubMed ID: 24731155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Two-stage approach based on zone and dose findings for two-agent combination Phase I/II trials.
Shimamura F; Hamada C; Matsui S; Hirakawa A
J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(6):1025-1037. PubMed ID: 29420127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bayesian dose-finding designs for combination of molecularly targeted agents assuming partial stochastic ordering.
Guo B; Li Y
Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(5):859-75. PubMed ID: 25413162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A web application for evaluating Phase I methods using a non-parametric optimal benchmark.
Wages NA; Varhegyi N
Clin Trials; 2017 Oct; 14(5):553-557. PubMed ID: 28649874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Calibration of prior variance in the Bayesian continual reassessment method.
Lee SM; Cheung YK
Stat Med; 2011 Jul; 30(17):2081-9. PubMed ID: 21413054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A utility-based Bayesian optimal interval (U-BOIN) phase I/II design to identify the optimal biological dose for targeted and immune therapies.
Zhou Y; Lee JJ; Yuan Y
Stat Med; 2019 Dec; 38(28):5299-5316. PubMed ID: 31621952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An adaptive multi-stage phase I dose-finding design incorporating continuous efficacy and toxicity data from multiple treatment cycles.
Du Y; Yin J; Sargent DJ; Mandrekar SJ
J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(2):271-286. PubMed ID: 30403559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improved adaptive randomization strategies for a seamless Phase I/II dose-finding design.
Yan D; Wages NA; Dressler EV
J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(2):333-347. PubMed ID: 30451068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. STEIN: A simple toxicity and efficacy interval design for seamless phase I/II clinical trials.
Lin R; Yin G
Stat Med; 2017 Nov; 36(26):4106-4120. PubMed ID: 28786138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Seamless Phase I/II Adaptive Design for Oncology Trials of Molecularly Targeted Agents.
Wages NA; Tait C
J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(5):903-20. PubMed ID: 24904956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A benchmark for dose-finding studies with unknown ordering.
Mozgunov P; Paoletti X; Jaki T
Biostatistics; 2022 Jul; 23(3):721-737. PubMed ID: 33409536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adaptive dose selection using efficacy-toxicity trade-offs: illustrations and practical considerations.
Thall PF; Cook JD; Estey EH
J Biopharm Stat; 2006; 16(5):623-38. PubMed ID: 17037262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A trivariate continual reassessment method for phase I/II trials of toxicity, efficacy, and surrogate efficacy.
Zhong W; Koopmeiners JS; Carlin BP
Stat Med; 2012 Dec; 31(29):3885-95. PubMed ID: 22807126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Bayesian dose-finding design for phase I/II clinical trials with nonignorable dropouts.
Guo B; Yuan Y
Stat Med; 2015 May; 34(10):1721-32. PubMed ID: 25626676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bayesian dose-finding in phase I/II clinical trials using toxicity and efficacy odds ratios.
Yin G; Li Y; Ji Y
Biometrics; 2006 Sep; 62(3):777-84. PubMed ID: 16984320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
