These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24571877)

  • 1. Jaundice as a prognostic factor in patients undergoing radical treatment for carcinomas of the ampulla of Vater.
    Zhou J; Zhang Q; Li P; Shan Y; Zhao D; Cai J
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2014; 127(5):860-4. PubMed ID: 24571877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ampullary cancer and preoperative jaundice: possible indication of the minimal surgery.
    Uchida H; Shibata K; Iwaki K; Kai S; Ohta M; Kitano S
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2009; 56(93):1194-8. PubMed ID: 19760968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Glasgow prognostic score predicts therapeutic outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy for carcinoma of the ampulla of vater.
    Shiba H; Misawa T; Fujiwara Y; Futagawa Y; Furukawa K; Haruki K; Iwase R; Wakiyama S; Ishida Y; Yanaga K
    Anticancer Res; 2013 Jun; 33(6):2715-21. PubMed ID: 23749931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surgical outcomes and prognostic factors for ampulla of Vater cancer.
    Choi SB; Kim WB; Song TJ; Suh SO; Kim YC; Choi SY
    Scand J Surg; 2011; 100(2):92-8. PubMed ID: 21737384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinicopathological and operative factors for prognosis of carcinoma of the ampulla of vater.
    Inoue Y; Hayashi M; Hirokawa F; Egashira Y; Tanigawa N
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2012; 59(117):1573-6. PubMed ID: 22683975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical value of serum CA19-9 as a prognostic factor for the ampulla of Vater carcinoma.
    Kurihara C; Yoshimi F; Sasaki K; Iijima T; Kawasaki H; Nagai H
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2013 Oct; 60(127):1588-91. PubMed ID: 23933785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical significance of pathologic subtype in curatively resected ampulla of vater cancer.
    Kim WS; Choi DW; Choi SH; Heo JS; You DD; Lee HG
    J Surg Oncol; 2012 Mar; 105(3):266-72. PubMed ID: 21882202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors influencing recurrence after curative resection for ampulla of Vater carcinoma.
    Park JS; Yoon DS; Kim KS; Choi JS; Lee WJ; Chi HS; Kim BR
    J Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 95(4):286-90. PubMed ID: 17326125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prognostic factors of carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater after surgery.
    Zhou J; Zhang Q; Li P; Shan Y; Zhao D; Cai J
    Tumour Biol; 2014 Feb; 35(2):1143-8. PubMed ID: 24026886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Effect of preoperative biliary drainage on liver function changes in patients with malignant obstructive jaundice in the low bile duct before and after pancreaticoduodenectomy].
    Chen D; Liang LJ; Peng BG; Zhou Q; Li SQ; Tang D; Huang L; Huang JF
    Ai Zheng; 2008 Jan; 27(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 18184470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nodal involvement as an indicator of postoperative liver metastasis in carcinoma of the papilla of Vater.
    Moriya T; Kimura W; Hirai I; Mizutani M; Ma J; Kamiga M; Fuse A
    J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg; 2006; 13(6):549-55. PubMed ID: 17139430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Predictors of recurrence after pancreaticoduodenectomy for carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater].
    Chen J; Cai S; Dong J
    Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2012 Sep; 32(9):1242-4. PubMed ID: 22985555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Clinical significance of solitary lymph node metastasis in carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater].
    Shan Y; Zhao DB; Che X; Wang JX; Shao YF; Zhao P
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2006 Sep; 28(9):694-6. PubMed ID: 17274378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prognostic relevance of lymph node ratio and number of resected nodes after curative resection of ampulla of Vater carcinoma.
    Falconi M; Crippa S; Domínguez I; Barugola G; Capelli P; Marcucci S; Beghelli S; Scarpa A; Bassi C; Pederzoli P
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Nov; 15(11):3178-86. PubMed ID: 18712568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Gross appearance of the ampullary tumor predicts lymph node metastasis and outcome.
    Kayahara M; Ohta T
    Dig Surg; 2010; 27(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 20551657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater: results of surgical treatment of a single center.
    Memon MA; Shiwani MH; Anwer S
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2004; 51(59):1275-7. PubMed ID: 15362731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of preoperative endoscopic cholangiography and biliary drainage in Ampulla of Vater cancer.
    Ahn KS; Kang KJ; Kim YH; Lee YS; Cho GB; Kim TS; Lee JW
    Surg Oncol; 2018 Mar; 27(1):82-87. PubMed ID: 29549909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Expression of the caudal-type homeodomain transcription factors CDX 1/2 and outcome in carcinomas of the ampulla of Vater.
    Hansel DE; Maitra A; Lin JW; Goggins M; Argani P; Yeo CJ; Piantadosi S; Leach SD; Biankin AV
    J Clin Oncol; 2005 Mar; 23(9):1811-8. PubMed ID: 15774774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Determinants of long-term survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for ampulla of Vater carcinoma].
    Chen JY; Cai SW; Zhang WZ; Huang XQ; Liu R; Wang J; Chen YL; Ji WB; Shi XJ; Chen MY; Liu ZW; Zhao XQ; Feng YQ; Huang ZQ; Dong JH
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Dec; 89(48):3409-12. PubMed ID: 20223115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Number of lymph node metastases: a significant prognostic factor for patients with radical resection of carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater].
    Liu N; Liang H; Zhang RP; Pan Y; Liu Y; Deng JY; Wang XN; Ding XW; Hao XS
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Jul; 10(4):350-2. PubMed ID: 17659460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.